Anonymous wrote:UVA the highest test scores in the state. Obviously
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA the highest test scores in the state. Obviously
50% of the entering class didn't submit SAT scores.
Pretty consistent across the board for the competitive publics (45% at Tech and W&M)
What's surprising to me is that only 30% of the entering class at Washington & Lee submitted SAT scores (and the percentiles were identical to UVA).
Do parents still think test optional is a fad?
NP, I did/do, but I've been wrong before.
Based on the prevailing stats, you're likely wrong on this too.
DP: Or it's a fad that is still going but maybe plateauing. I don't see UVA and WM's % of accepted who submitted scores going down much further for instance. But I could be wrong too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The GPAs are based on the time of the application right? So kids doing ED would have a slightly lower GPA with their end of Junior year grades. How much can a weighted GPA rise during the first semester of the Senior year?
Any ideas? Are the listed GPAs as of the time of submission (which lowers them for ED applicants) or as of graduation?
Anonymous wrote:The GPAs are based on the time of the application right? So kids doing ED would have a slightly lower GPA with their end of Junior year grades. How much can a weighted GPA rise during the first semester of the Senior year?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This stats aren’t really helpful, because they report the university as a whole. Many programs are either easier or more difficult. VT engineering is much higher than the numbers reported for VT as a whole.
Special programs everywhere usually require higher scores than the average at any college I would assume. However, they can serve as a general idea.
UVA has engineering too, and their average is still higher than Tech. W&M has no engineering, and they are right there with UVA. You will never have true apples to apples without all the details.
Just look at the college your kid is interested in how they'd fit into the general profile and then make adjustments for special programs and hooks.
Wow. W&M with no engineering actually has almost identical SATs and GPAs as UVA— and higher 75% GPAs. And identical ACTs. With about the Sam percentage of kids reporting test scores. So much for being a second chance for kids not admitted to UVA.
W&M has always been a hard admit.
Anonymous wrote:Son exceeded 75th percentile for SAT and GPA at UVA resulting in a WL...don't think I'll be showing him this!! Thanks for providing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This stats aren’t really helpful, because they report the university as a whole. Many programs are either easier or more difficult. VT engineering is much higher than the numbers reported for VT as a whole.
Special programs everywhere usually require higher scores than the average at any college I would assume. However, they can serve as a general idea.
UVA has engineering too, and their average is still higher than Tech. W&M has no engineering, and they are right there with UVA. You will never have true apples to apples without all the details.
Just look at the college your kid is interested in how they'd fit into the general profile and then make adjustments for special programs and hooks.
Wow. W&M with no engineering actually has almost identical SATs and GPAs as UVA— and higher 75% GPAs. And identical ACTs. With about the Sam percentage of kids reporting test scores. So much for being a second chance for kids not admitted to UVA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was digging into the data. For 2021-2022 grads, roughly the same percentage of the class graduated with student loans— roughly 1/3 of grades. But the average total loans from WM were $21,000 for a BA. For UVA it is $51,000 for a BA. That’s a huge difference.
Why is that? W&M is more expensive in state and less expensive OOS. Is W&M better with financial aid? Or is it that it’s a small SLAC like school and students are self selecting and just more affluent? I would have predicted WM students to have more debt because most students are in state.
What's the OOS proportion of the student body for UVA v. W&M?
Both are the same (about 1/3) in part because they are required by state to have at least 2/3 in-state.
Anonymous wrote:UVA the highest test scores in the state. Obviously
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was digging into the data. For 2021-2022 grads, roughly the same percentage of the class graduated with student loans— roughly 1/3 of grades. But the average total loans from WM were $21,000 for a BA. For UVA it is $51,000 for a BA. That’s a huge difference.
Why is that? W&M is more expensive in state and less expensive OOS. Is W&M better with financial aid? Or is it that it’s a small SLAC like school and students are self selecting and just more affluent? I would have predicted WM students to have more debt because most students are in state.
What's the OOS proportion of the student body for UVA v. W&M?
Both are the same (about 1/3) in part because they are required by state to have at least 2/3 in-state.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA the highest test scores in the state. Obviously
50% of the entering class didn't submit SAT scores.
Pretty consistent across the board for the competitive publics (45% at Tech and W&M)
What's surprising to me is that only 30% of the entering class at Washington & Lee submitted SAT scores (and the percentiles were identical to UVA).
Do parents still think test optional is a fad?
NP, I did/do, but I've been wrong before.
Based on the prevailing stats, you're likely wrong on this too.
Anonymous wrote:Is the GPA reported for University of Richmond unweighted? If not, seems pretty low.
It looks like most other schools report/consider weighted GPAs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was digging into the data. For 2021-2022 grads, roughly the same percentage of the class graduated with student loans— roughly 1/3 of grades. But the average total loans from WM were $21,000 for a BA. For UVA it is $51,000 for a BA. That’s a huge difference.
Why is that? W&M is more expensive in state and less expensive OOS. Is W&M better with financial aid? Or is it that it’s a small SLAC like school and students are self selecting and just more affluent? I would have predicted WM students to have more debt because most students are in state.
What's the OOS proportion of the student body for UVA v. W&M?