Anonymous wrote:*shrug* OK, so nail him to the wall if he's guilty and the evidence supports it.

See, this is the difference between MAGA and normal people.

Yeah, you "normal people" were so understanding that you closed ranks when the democrat governor and lieutenant governor of Virginia were discovered to have been in blackface. You sure wanted them out of office. So much so, that you "normal people" let them serve their terms in office.

Yeah, you "normal people" are so much better than everyone else.

You sure have a short memory.

Just hilarious seeing the finger pointing comments from the people on this thread that are apparently Republicans and Democrats. No, your party is more corrupt, no your's is, no, you!! C'mon people! Step out of your bubbles. There are many politicians of these two failed political parties that are corrupt or unfit and have no business with leadership positions in this powerful country. We're smarter than this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrat here. Let the process play out. If the evidence is there, he will be convicted, and should be. DOJ is doing what it should do.

+1 Same with Hunter. And anyone who breaks the law. Don't give a crap what party they belong to.

Hunter is different. He is only being prosecuted because Garland and the DOJ are following Jim a Jordan’s orders. There is no proof that Hunter lied on a form(never arrested for drug possession or with drugs) and he has paid his back taxes with interest. It is an unwarranted prosecution.

Having "run out the clock" on all the serious offenses, right?

oops. How did that happen?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrat here. Let the process play out. If the evidence is there, he will be convicted, and should be. DOJ is doing what it should do.

+1 Same with Hunter. And anyone who breaks the law. Don't give a crap what party they belong to.

Hunter is different. He is only being prosecuted because Garland and the DOJ are following Jim a Jordan’s orders. There is no proof that Hunter lied on a form(never arrested for drug possession or with drugs) and he has paid his back taxes with interest. It is an unwarranted prosecution.

Not true.
One blatant lie in your post - Hunter NEVER paid the taxes he earned on income from Burisma in 2014.

Anonymous wrote:

The system is broken if Menendez never goes to prison.

Yawn. The system is already broken. The propulsion of daily shrapnel distracts us. Remember SCJ Clarence Thomas’ violation of legal and ethical standards by secretly accepting private flights, yacht trips and other luxuries from wealthy conservative donors over three decades.

The fact that you folks insist on singling out Justice Thomas while ignoring the trips and perks other Justices receive - including the "liberal" Justices - speaks volumes about you.

https://time.com/3945044/supreme-court-justices-free-trips/
https://publicintegrity.org/politics/supreme-court-justices-bolstered-by-free-travel-royalties-rental-income/
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/report-clarence-thomas-travel-habits-politics-plain-simple-expert

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrat here. Let the process play out. If the evidence is there, he will be convicted, and should be. DOJ is doing what it should do.

+1 Same with Hunter. And anyone who breaks the law. Don't give a crap what party they belong to.

Hunter is different. He is only being prosecuted because Garland and the DOJ are following Jim a Jordan’s orders. There is no proof that Hunter lied on a form(never arrested for drug possession or with drugs) and he has paid his back taxes with interest. It is an unwarranted prosecution.

The system is broken if Menendez never goes to prison.

Yawn. The system is already broken. The propulsion of daily shrapnel distracts us. Remember SCJ Clarence Thomas’ violation of legal and ethical standards by secretly accepting private flights, yacht trips and other luxuries from wealthy conservative donors over three decades.

Typical. Pull that race card.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrat here. Let the process play out. If the evidence is there, he will be convicted, and should be. DOJ is doing what it should do.

+1 Same with Hunter. And anyone who breaks the law. Don't give a crap what party they belong to.

Agree. It’s pretty simple.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:*shrug* OK, so nail him to the wall if he's guilty and the evidence supports it.

See, this is the difference between MAGA and normal people.

Same.

+1

^^^ HOW anything works.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The FBI has been sitting on this for 14 months. Comes out the day after Garland’s hearing.

“Sitting on it”?

The evidence you are seeing

So, as soon as they saw any evidence of anything at all they were supposed to indict him? You have no idea if anything works.

Anonymous wrote:Democrat here. Let the process play out. If the evidence is there, he will be convicted, and should be. DOJ is doing what it should do.

+1 Same with Hunter. And anyone who breaks the law. Don't give a crap what party they belong to.

Anonymous wrote:Too bad he's not a Texas politician. They like 'em crooked and corrupt there.

Or Illinois

Anonymous wrote:*shrug* OK, so nail him to the wall if he's guilty and the evidence supports it.

See, this is the difference between MAGA and normal people.

Same.