Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is just pathetic and a joke of a politician:








You’d really send a clown like that to represent the United States if he ever had to meet counterparts abroad? Just an absolute decline of civilization in the United States. It’s sad and pathetic we really have to demand more from our leaders to wear trailer park trash outfits consisting of hoodies and gym shorts at work.

The Republican elites are showing their true colors on this thread. Taking a big shit on the working man.

LOL. "The working man." You say it like he is laboring in the field... where his attire may be more appropriate.
This guy is a Senator. He should dress like one.

yeah, we know you laugh and mock us while we cut your lawns while you sip your white wine in the middle of the day while complaining about taxes.

What in the hell are you talking about? This thread is about the Senate.... not landscape workers.

And, just for your information.... we tend to our own lawn and don't drink wine.

Yep, we got it. The senate is too good for working class folks and we need to stay in our place.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whataboutism here is really something.

Anything to avoid discussing the topic at hand..... the fact that Senators no longer have a dress code, but their staffers and every one else does.

How does Schumer defend this?

Who F cares? Are they aiding and abetting an insurrection? Let them dress how they want to. Fetterman has shown more respect for the constitution and the institution of the Senate than any of the Senators who didn't vote to convict Trump for 1/6. But please carry on with the faux pearl clutching. Maybe we can make Obama's mustard colored suit a thing again.

Why just Senators?
Why not staff as well?

Answer: Because this is solely for Fetterman. A rule change for one Senator because he refuses to follow the dress code.

NO ONE CARES.

Actually, they do.
I just hope some brave reporter asks Schumer why he exempted Senators from the dress code and not everybody else. I can't wait to hear his reasoning.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is just pathetic and a joke of a politician:








You’d really send a clown like that to represent the United States if he ever had to meet counterparts abroad? Just an absolute decline of civilization in the United States. It’s sad and pathetic we really have to demand more from our leaders to wear trailer park trash outfits consisting of hoodies and gym shorts at work.

Keep clutching those pearls, Brunch Granny!

You are no doubt one of the many DCUM fashion critics on the thread about "Trump women and their fashion mishaps."
His hoodie and shorts are not appropriate attire for the office. Most bosses in a professional setting would have HR sit down with him to explain how to dress appropriately.

His attire is fine. My boss (a private equity executive) once showed up to a closing in jeans and t-shirt. He was writing a $100 million check. It does. Not. Matter. It only matters for people without actual power who are beholden to others.

Your boss does not represent The United States of America, dimwit.

Lauren Boebert represents The United States of America. I haven’t heard you squawking in outrage at her recent behavior, so it’s hard to take you seriously.

Why would I care what boebert does for n her own free time OUTSIDE of work?

Pathetic Fetterman looks like a homeless person purpose while AT WORK representing the United States.

I know common sense goes over your head, but wow.

Double standards are the only standards you have. Thanks for confirming that. You’re too dim-witted to understand that elected officials represent their people regardless of where they are.
Keep raving and ranting like a loon if you please, it’s amusing to watch you come unglued. 😂

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is just pathetic and a joke of a politician:








You’d really send a clown like that to represent the United States if he ever had to meet counterparts abroad? Just an absolute decline of civilization in the United States. It’s sad and pathetic we really have to demand more from our leaders to wear trailer park trash outfits consisting of hoodies and gym shorts at work.

The Republican elites are showing their true colors on this thread. Taking a big shit on the working man.

LOL. "The working man." You say it like he is laboring in the field... where his attire may be more appropriate.
This guy is a Senator. He should dress like one.

yeah, we know you laugh and mock us while we cut your lawns while you sip your white wine in the middle of the day while complaining about taxes.

What in the hell are you talking about? This thread is about the Senate.... not landscape workers.

And, just for your information.... we tend to our own lawn and don't drink wine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is just pathetic and a joke of a politician:








You’d really send a clown like that to represent the United States if he ever had to meet counterparts abroad? Just an absolute decline of civilization in the United States. It’s sad and pathetic we really have to demand more from our leaders to wear trailer park trash outfits consisting of hoodies and gym shorts at work.

Keep clutching those pearls, Brunch Granny!

You are no doubt one of the many DCUM fashion critics on the thread about "Trump women and their fashion mishaps."
His hoodie and shorts are not appropriate attire for the office. Most bosses in a professional setting would have HR sit down with him to explain how to dress appropriately.

His attire is fine. My boss (a private equity executive) once showed up to a closing in jeans and t-shirt. He was writing a $100 million check. It does. Not. Matter. It only matters for people without actual power who are beholden to others.

Your boss does not represent The United States of America, dimwit.

Lauren Boebert represents The United States of America. I haven’t heard you squawking in outrage at her recent behavior, so it’s hard to take you seriously.

Why would I care what boebert does for n her own free time OUTSIDE of work?

Pathetic Fetterman looks like a homeless person purpose while AT WORK representing the United States.

I know common sense goes over your head, but wow.

Stay mad.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is just pathetic and a joke of a politician:








You’d really send a clown like that to represent the United States if he ever had to meet counterparts abroad? Just an absolute decline of civilization in the United States. It’s sad and pathetic we really have to demand more from our leaders to wear trailer park trash outfits consisting of hoodies and gym shorts at work.

Keep clutching those pearls, Brunch Granny!

You are no doubt one of the many DCUM fashion critics on the thread about "Trump women and their fashion mishaps."
His hoodie and shorts are not appropriate attire for the office. Most bosses in a professional setting would have HR sit down with him to explain how to dress appropriately.

His attire is fine. My boss (a private equity executive) once showed up to a closing in jeans and t-shirt. He was writing a $100 million check. It does. Not. Matter. It only matters for people without actual power who are beholden to others.

Your boss does not represent The United States of America, dimwit.

Lauren Boebert represents The United States of America. I haven’t heard you squawking in outrage at her recent behavior, so it’s hard to take you seriously.

Why would I care what boebert does for n her own free time OUTSIDE of work?

Pathetic Fetterman looks like a homeless person purpose while AT WORK representing the United States.

I know common sense goes over your head, but wow.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The whataboutism here is really something.

Anything to avoid discussing the topic at hand..... the fact that Senators no longer have a dress code, but their staffers and every one else does.

How does Schumer defend this?

Who F cares? Are they aiding and abetting an insurrection? Let them dress how they want to. Fetterman has shown more respect for the constitution and the institution of the Senate than any of the Senators who didn't vote to convict Trump for 1/6. But please carry on with the faux pearl clutching. Maybe we can make Obama's mustard colored suit a thing again.

Why just Senators?
Why not staff as well?

Answer: Because this is solely for Fetterman. A rule change for one Senator because he refuses to follow the dress code.

NO ONE CARES.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is just pathetic and a joke of a politician:








You’d really send a clown like that to represent the United States if he ever had to meet counterparts abroad? Just an absolute decline of civilization in the United States. It’s sad and pathetic we really have to demand more from our leaders to wear trailer park trash outfits consisting of hoodies and gym shorts at work.

Keep clutching those pearls, Brunch Granny!

You are no doubt one of the many DCUM fashion critics on the thread about "Trump women and their fashion mishaps."
His hoodie and shorts are not appropriate attire for the office. Most bosses in a professional setting would have HR sit down with him to explain how to dress appropriately.

His attire is fine. My boss (a private equity executive) once showed up to a closing in jeans and t-shirt. He was writing a $100 million check. It does. Not. Matter. It only matters for people without actual power who are beholden to others.

Then why is EVERYBODY ELSE required to follow the standard dress code in Senate chambers?????

Cause they never had the b**ls to say that's not what they wanted to do.

They are not Senators.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is just pathetic and a joke of a politician:








You’d really send a clown like that to represent the United States if he ever had to meet counterparts abroad? Just an absolute decline of civilization in the United States. It’s sad and pathetic we really have to demand more from our leaders to wear trailer park trash outfits consisting of hoodies and gym shorts at work.

Keep clutching those pearls, Brunch Granny!

You are no doubt one of the many DCUM fashion critics on the thread about "Trump women and their fashion mishaps."
His hoodie and shorts are not appropriate attire for the office. Most bosses in a professional setting would have HR sit down with him to explain how to dress appropriately.

His attire is fine. My boss (a private equity executive) once showed up to a closing in jeans and t-shirt. He was writing a $100 million check. It does. Not. Matter. It only matters for people without actual power who are beholden to others.

Then why is EVERYBODY ELSE required to follow the standard dress code in Senate chambers?????

Cause they never had the b**ls to say that's not what they wanted to do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is just pathetic and a joke of a politician:








You’d really send a clown like that to represent the United States if he ever had to meet counterparts abroad? Just an absolute decline of civilization in the United States. It’s sad and pathetic we really have to demand more from our leaders to wear trailer park trash outfits consisting of hoodies and gym shorts at work.

Keep clutching those pearls, Brunch Granny!

You are no doubt one of the many DCUM fashion critics on the thread about "Trump women and their fashion mishaps."
His hoodie and shorts are not appropriate attire for the office. Most bosses in a professional setting would have HR sit down with him to explain how to dress appropriately.

The nice thing about being the powerful boss yourself is you get to decide for yourself what to wear. It may be a suit, it may be a gold dress with your b**bs hanging out, it may be a sweatshirt and shorts.

Anonymous wrote:

This is from j6?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is just pathetic and a joke of a politician:








You’d really send a clown like that to represent the United States if he ever had to meet counterparts abroad? Just an absolute decline of civilization in the United States. It’s sad and pathetic we really have to demand more from our leaders to wear trailer park trash outfits consisting of hoodies and gym shorts at work.

Keep clutching those pearls, Brunch Granny!

You are no doubt one of the many DCUM fashion critics on the thread about "Trump women and their fashion mishaps."
His hoodie and shorts are not appropriate attire for the office. Most bosses in a professional setting would have HR sit down with him to explain how to dress appropriately.

His attire is fine. My boss (a private equity executive) once showed up to a closing in jeans and t-shirt. He was writing a $100 million check. It does. Not. Matter. It only matters for people without actual power who are beholden to others.

Your boss does not represent The United States of America, dimwit.

Lauren Boebert represents The United States of America. I haven’t heard you squawking in outrage at her recent behavior, so it’s hard to take you seriously.

The thing about dress codes, and manners in general, is that they are for other people. Not yourself. You wear a suit/business dress or formal national costume as a sign of respect to the people you interact with. You felt that your interlocutor was important enough to take care in your appearance.

Laborers get dressed up for church/synagogue/mosque/temple/etc, weddings, graduations, and other formal events.

It’s not pearl clutching to be disappointed to see the Senate do away with one.

Signed,
A liberal democrat

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is just pathetic and a joke of a politician:








You’d really send a clown like that to represent the United States if he ever had to meet counterparts abroad? Just an absolute decline of civilization in the United States. It’s sad and pathetic we really have to demand more from our leaders to wear trailer park trash outfits consisting of hoodies and gym shorts at work.

Keep clutching those pearls, Brunch Granny!

You are no doubt one of the many DCUM fashion critics on the thread about "Trump women and their fashion mishaps."
His hoodie and shorts are not appropriate attire for the office. Most bosses in a professional setting would have HR sit down with him to explain how to dress appropriately.

His attire is fine. My boss (a private equity executive) once showed up to a closing in jeans and t-shirt. He was writing a $100 million check. It does. Not. Matter. It only matters for people without actual power who are beholden to others.

Your boss does not represent The United States of America, dimwit.