Anonymous wrote:No person should be judged and condemned forever on the worst act of their lives when they act was committed when they were very young and thus their frontal lobe not fully developed. We know from neuroscience that the brains of teenagers are fundamentally different than the brains of adults. It is far more reprehensible for an fully functioning normal IQ adult to commit a murder than for a teenager to commit a murder.
Throwing people away at 15, 16, 17 just doesn't make sense. Of course there should be accountability, but teenagers have a far greater capacity for rehabilitation than do adult offenders, and we should give them the opportunity. Very few teenage offenders are psychopaths or sociopaths - and we can assess for those that are. The black and white thinking displayed in many of the comments on this board is chilling. You think you know that your teenager is incapable of heinous acts, but you don't in fact know this. Plenty of the teenagers in the juvenile justice system were raised by good parents who instilled good morals. But the human brain is what it is, and in young humans it is highly volatile, impulsive and lacks capacity to appreciate long term consequences. Add to that intoxicating substances and the recipe far too often leads to disaster.
Here is just one story of the capacity for rehabilitation; there are thousands more out there.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/20/us/philadelphia-larry-miller-edward-white/index.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/21/nike-executive-larry-miller-thankful-family-of-man-he-killed-forgives-him.html
Anonymous wrote:Sometimes the convicted are actually innocent. Read wiki on central park five. Not saying that's true in this case, but limiting to one appeal will cause innocent people to be executed. If you support 'one appeal, then execution', that is tantamount to murder even though you are not injecting the poison yourself. Lock them up for life instead.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:House arrest for life, after some time in prison.
I get by society's standards he will see some incarceration time but let's be honest, this stupid boy spending time with hardened criminals will not help society in the least.
Have you watched the video? It was an intentional, cold-blooded murder committed for absolutely no reason, one of the most heinous crimes I have ever seen or heard of. Calling it “stupid” is appalling, it was way more than this. In a just society, this would be a death penalty offense. The “boy” should be locked up for many decades.
Just societies don't have the death penalty.
Of course they do. And this is precisely the sort of crime that merits it.
Which just societies have the death penalty in 2023?
None because it is immoral, expensive (endless death row appeals) and does not deter violent crime. See Amnesty International’s extensive research and evidence around why the death penalty does not help societies.
I was horrified by the video and was in shocked by the teens’ callous intentional running over of an innocent cyclist. I have no idea if they are criminally insane or just young, reckless and ruthless - only medically qualified people could determine that.
However, state sanctioned murder of the perps will not prevent mental illness/ poor parental guidance or egregious youthful behavior.
One appeal and then execution. Don't care whether it deters anyone else. It eliminates a horrendous murderer from society. Justice for the innocent bicyclist and his family.
Sometimes the convicted are actually innocent. Read wiki on central park five. Not saying that's true in this case, but limiting to one appeal will cause innocent people to be executed. If you support 'one appeal, then execution', that is tantamount to murder even though you are not injecting the poison yourself. Lock them up for life instead.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:House arrest for life, after some time in prison.
I get by society's standards he will see some incarceration time but let's be honest, this stupid boy spending time with hardened criminals will not help society in the least.
Have you watched the video? It was an intentional, cold-blooded murder committed for absolutely no reason, one of the most heinous crimes I have ever seen or heard of. Calling it “stupid” is appalling, it was way more than this. In a just society, this would be a death penalty offense. The “boy” should be locked up for many decades.
Just societies don't have the death penalty.
Of course they do. And this is precisely the sort of crime that merits it.
Which just societies have the death penalty in 2023?
None because it is immoral, expensive (endless death row appeals) and does not deter violent crime. See Amnesty International’s extensive research and evidence around why the death penalty does not help societies.
I was horrified by the video and was in shocked by the teens’ callous intentional running over of an innocent cyclist. I have no idea if they are criminally insane or just young, reckless and ruthless - only medically qualified people could determine that.
However, state sanctioned murder of the perps will not prevent mental illness/ poor parental guidance or egregious youthful behavior.
One appeal and then execution. Don't care whether it deters anyone else. It eliminates a horrendous murderer from society. Justice for the innocent bicyclist and his family.
Anonymous wrote:No person should be judged and condemned forever on the worst act of their lives when they act was committed when they were very young and thus their frontal lobe not fully developed. We know from neuroscience that the brains of teenagers are fundamentally different than the brains of adults. It is far more reprehensible for an fully functioning normal IQ adult to commit a murder than for a teenager to commit a murder.
Throwing people away at 15, 16, 17 just doesn't make sense. Of course there should be accountability, but teenagers have a far greater capacity for rehabilitation than do adult offenders, and we should give them the opportunity. Very few teenage offenders are psychopaths or sociopaths - and we can assess for those that are. The black and white thinking displayed in many of the comments on this board is chilling. You think you know that your teenager is incapable of heinous acts, but you don't in fact know this. Plenty of the teenagers in the juvenile justice system were raised by good parents who instilled good morals. But the human brain is what it is, and in young humans it is highly volatile, impulsive and lacks capacity to appreciate long term consequences. Add to that intoxicating substances and the recipe far too often leads to disaster.
Here is just one story of the capacity for rehabilitation; there are thousands more out there.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/20/us/philadelphia-larry-miller-edward-white/index.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/21/nike-executive-larry-miller-thankful-family-of-man-he-killed-forgives-him.html
Anonymous wrote:No person should be judged and condemned forever on the worst act of their lives when they act was committed when they were very young and thus their frontal lobe not fully developed. We know from neuroscience that the brains of teenagers are fundamentally different than the brains of adults. It is far more reprehensible for an fully functioning normal IQ adult to commit a murder than for a teenager to commit a murder.
Throwing people away at 15, 16, 17 just doesn't make sense. Of course there should be accountability, but teenagers have a far greater capacity for rehabilitation than do adult offenders, and we should give them the opportunity. Very few teenage offenders are psychopaths or sociopaths - and we can assess for those that are. The black and white thinking displayed in many of the comments on this board is chilling. You think you know that your teenager is incapable of heinous acts, but you don't in fact know this. Plenty of the teenagers in the juvenile justice system were raised by good parents who instilled good morals. But the human brain is what it is, and in young humans it is highly volatile, impulsive and lacks capacity to appreciate long term consequences. Add to that intoxicating substances and the recipe far too often leads to disaster.
Here is just one story of the capacity for rehabilitation; there are thousands more out there.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/20/us/philadelphia-larry-miller-edward-white/index.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/21/nike-executive-larry-miller-thankful-family-of-man-he-killed-forgives-him.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anything to keep the perpetrator off of the streets and committing more crimes.
Well actually the opposite occurs - US states that use the death penalty have significantly higher rates of violent crimes and murder.
No one thinks the callous actions of these teens can be justified in any way shape or form: but the death penalty is not the answer .
Anonymous wrote:Anything to keep the perpetrator off of the streets and committing more crimes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:House arrest for life, after some time in prison.
I get by society's standards he will see some incarceration time but let's be honest, this stupid boy spending time with hardened criminals will not help society in the least.
Have you watched the video? It was an intentional, cold-blooded murder committed for absolutely no reason, one of the most heinous crimes I have ever seen or heard of. Calling it “stupid” is appalling, it was way more than this. In a just society, this would be a death penalty offense. The “boy” should be locked up for many decades.
Just societies don't have the death penalty.
Of course they do. And this is precisely the sort of crime that merits it.
Which just societies have the death penalty in 2023?
None because it is immoral, expensive (endless death row appeals) and does not deter violent crime. See Amnesty International’s extensive research and evidence around why the death penalty does not help societies.
I was horrified by the video and was in shocked by the teens’ callous intentional running over of an innocent cyclist. I have no idea if they are criminally insane or just young, reckless and ruthless - only medically qualified people could determine that.
However, state sanctioned murder of the perps will not prevent mental illness/ poor parental guidance or egregious youthful behavior.
One appeal and then execution. Don't care whether it deters anyone else. It eliminates a horrendous murderer from society. Justice for the innocent bicyclist and his family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:House arrest for life, after some time in prison.
I get by society's standards he will see some incarceration time but let's be honest, this stupid boy spending time with hardened criminals will not help society in the least.
Have you watched the video? It was an intentional, cold-blooded murder committed for absolutely no reason, one of the most heinous crimes I have ever seen or heard of. Calling it “stupid” is appalling, it was way more than this. In a just society, this would be a death penalty offense. The “boy” should be locked up for many decades.
Just societies don't have the death penalty.
Of course they do. And this is precisely the sort of crime that merits it.
Which just societies have the death penalty in 2023?
None because it is immoral, expensive (endless death row appeals) and does not deter violent crime. See Amnesty International’s extensive research and evidence around why the death penalty does not help societies.
I was horrified by the video and was in shocked by the teens’ callous intentional running over of an innocent cyclist. I have no idea if they are criminally insane or just young, reckless and ruthless - only medically qualified people could determine that.
However, state sanctioned murder of the perps will not prevent mental illness/ poor parental guidance or egregious youthful behavior.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:House arrest for life, after some time in prison.
I get by society's standards he will see some incarceration time but let's be honest, this stupid boy spending time with hardened criminals will not help society in the least.
Have you watched the video? It was an intentional, cold-blooded murder committed for absolutely no reason, one of the most heinous crimes I have ever seen or heard of. Calling it “stupid” is appalling, it was way more than this. In a just society, this would be a death penalty offense. The “boy” should be locked up for many decades.
Just societies don't have the death penalty.
Of course they do. And this is precisely the sort of crime that merits it.
Which just societies have the death penalty in 2023?
None because it is immoral, expensive (endless death row appeals) and does not deter violent crime. See Amnesty International’s extensive research and evidence around why the death penalty does not help societies.
I was horrified by the video and was in shocked by the teens’ callous intentional running over of an innocent cyclist. I have no idea if they are criminally insane or just young, reckless and ruthless - only medically qualified people could determine that.
However, state sanctioned murder of the perps will not prevent mental illness/ poor parental guidance or egregious youthful behavior.
Anonymous wrote:The driver is under 18, there are no serious repercussions for their actions. Juvi for a year, tops.
https://www.8newsnow.com/news/local-news/las-vegas-teenager-facing-murder-charge-after-intentionally-hitting-bicyclist-with-stolen-car-police-say/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:House arrest for life, after some time in prison.
I get by society's standards he will see some incarceration time but let's be honest, this stupid boy spending time with hardened criminals will not help society in the least.
Have you watched the video? It was an intentional, cold-blooded murder committed for absolutely no reason, one of the most heinous crimes I have ever seen or heard of. Calling it “stupid” is appalling, it was way more than this. In a just society, this would be a death penalty offense. The “boy” should be locked up for many decades.
Just societies don't have the death penalty.
Of course they do. And this is precisely the sort of crime that merits it.
Which just societies have the death penalty in 2023?
Anonymous wrote:I'm as liberal as they come, but this person is at the very least a sociopath and possibly a psychopath. He should be locked up for a very long time. It's not about his brain development; it's more likely a genetic deficit and there is no cure. Sure, some psychopaths can function in society but the odds are long.