Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I found it interesting that she was walking out. Isn’t it a hospital protocol to exit in a wheelchair?

You’re assuming she was the patient. They could have been there to see someone else.

I think it's this. Also, I feel like he may have overreacted. Meaning, if it was someone else (or even her) maybe he didn't need to be notified AT THE TIME of the emergency, but maybe assess the situation and then call him. Someone that calls off a tour with all those people/livelihoods should be the person that gets the whole story at notification.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I found it interesting that she was walking out. Isn’t it a hospital protocol to exit in a wheelchair?

You’re assuming she was the patient. They could have been there to see someone else.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She posted last week “one month.”

She’s 36 or 37 weeks by now. Practically full term.

36 weeks is still early to go into labor. It’s not an emergency, emergency, but outcomes are meaningfully worse than full term. The median 36 weeker ends up in the NICU. If it’s a boy and/or they don’t get lung shots in in time, odds of a substantial NICU stay go up substantially. We’ve all gotten super used to modern medicine saving premises, but many of those kids have substantial complications… and 60 years ago the President’s baby was dying from prematurity at 35 weeks. It’s not no big deal to be a month early.

This is way over-exaggerated. 36 weekers do not have “meaningfully worse outcomes”, or “substantial complications” just by virtue of being born at 36 weeks. I had 2 36 weekers 11 years ago and it was no big deal, the doctors were not concerned in the least before my delivery.

NP. I was told that if I had another baby I would need a c-section at 36 weeks because of possible complications for me and the baby. So the doctors clearly found that to be an acceptable threshold of gestation.

36 weeks is just days from full-term. Both my kids were born right around then (one a few days past 36 weeks, one a day before). Absolutely no intervention needed during labor or after. They didn't even consider it pre-term at all.

It depends on if the baby was a boy or a girl. Usually boys would need the steroid shots.

You need to stop posting as your ignorance is overwhelming.

Excuse me? That is absolutely what I’ve learned. Often, boys need the steroid shots for lung development but girls are usually slightly more developed at that time. How is that overwhelming “ignorance”?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She posted last week “one month.”

She’s 36 or 37 weeks by now. Practically full term.

36 weeks is still early to go into labor. It’s not an emergency, emergency, but outcomes are meaningfully worse than full term. The median 36 weeker ends up in the NICU. If it’s a boy and/or they don’t get lung shots in in time, odds of a substantial NICU stay go up substantially. We’ve all gotten super used to modern medicine saving premises, but many of those kids have substantial complications… and 60 years ago the President’s baby was dying from prematurity at 35 weeks. It’s not no big deal to be a month early.

This is way over-exaggerated. 36 weekers do not have “meaningfully worse outcomes”, or “substantial complications” just by virtue of being born at 36 weeks. I had 2 36 weekers 11 years ago and it was no big deal, the doctors were not concerned in the least before my delivery.

NP. I was told that if I had another baby I would need a c-section at 36 weeks because of possible complications for me and the baby. So the doctors clearly found that to be an acceptable threshold of gestation.

36 weeks is just days from full-term. Both my kids were born right around then (one a few days past 36 weeks, one a day before). Absolutely no intervention needed during labor or after. They didn't even consider it pre-term at all.

It depends on if the baby was a boy or a girl. Usually boys would need the steroid shots.

You need to stop posting as your ignorance is overwhelming.

Anonymous wrote:I found it interesting that she was walking out. Isn’t it a hospital protocol to exit in a wheelchair?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is a “prayer room”?

Really? Airports and hospitals have rooms where you can pray in private.

I’ve never seen or heard of one at an airport.

Sounds like you rarely fly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is a “prayer room”?

Really? Airports and hospitals have rooms where you can pray in private.

I’ve never seen or heard of one at an airport.

Anonymous wrote:Any updates? This has to be about the baby.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She posted last week “one month.”

She’s 36 or 37 weeks by now. Practically full term.

36 weeks is still early to go into labor. It’s not an emergency, emergency, but outcomes are meaningfully worse than full term. The median 36 weeker ends up in the NICU. If it’s a boy and/or they don’t get lung shots in in time, odds of a substantial NICU stay go up substantially. We’ve all gotten super used to modern medicine saving premises, but many of those kids have substantial complications… and 60 years ago the President’s baby was dying from prematurity at 35 weeks. It’s not no big deal to be a month early.

This is way over-exaggerated. 36 weekers do not have “meaningfully worse outcomes”, or “substantial complications” just by virtue of being born at 36 weeks. I had 2 36 weekers 11 years ago and it was no big deal, the doctors were not concerned in the least before my delivery.

NP. I was told that if I had another baby I would need a c-section at 36 weeks because of possible complications for me and the baby. So the doctors clearly found that to be an acceptable threshold of gestation.

36 weeks is just days from full-term. Both my kids were born right around then (one a few days past 36 weeks, one a day before). Absolutely no intervention needed during labor or after. They didn't even consider it pre-term at all.

It depends on if the baby was a boy or a girl. Usually boys would need the steroid shots.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She posted last week “one month.”

She’s 36 or 37 weeks by now. Practically full term.

36 weeks is still early to go into labor. It’s not an emergency, emergency, but outcomes are meaningfully worse than full term. The median 36 weeker ends up in the NICU. If it’s a boy and/or they don’t get lung shots in in time, odds of a substantial NICU stay go up substantially. We’ve all gotten super used to modern medicine saving premises, but many of those kids have substantial complications… and 60 years ago the President’s baby was dying from prematurity at 35 weeks. It’s not no big deal to be a month early.

This is way over-exaggerated. 36 weekers do not have “meaningfully worse outcomes”, or “substantial complications” just by virtue of being born at 36 weeks. I had 2 36 weekers 11 years ago and it was no big deal, the doctors were not concerned in the least before my delivery.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know when I'm having a family emergency the first thing I do is post prayer room pictures on Instagram.

Have you ever flown before? There's lots of waiting involved.

Did you know waiting can be done without vague posting for attention?

Doesn't he have a private jet? Why is he in an airport with us mere mortals and a public prayer room?
Wouldn't he be on a Gulfstream G65 at the snap of his fingers instead?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is a “prayer room”?

Really? Airports and hospitals have rooms where you can pray in private.

I’ve never seen or heard of one at an airport.