Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why rush getting out of college, you get so much more out of 4 or 5 years than 3, academically, socially, fun, etc
I would rather my kid take a biology class at a university taught by a well respected college professor than some disgruntled high school teacher with 3 years on the job and no real world experience with a world class lab.
My DS graduated from UVA college of Engineering in 3 years because the school accepted over 30+ credits from his high school AP courses. He graduated in May '23 in three years, and I gave him 44K, the money I would have to pay for his last year at UVA, to travel the world before he comes back and either starts grad school or works for the NSA. Staying in school for 4 or 5 years only benefits the university, NOT you.
Btw, some of those "disgruntled" HS teachers have degrees from MIT or CalTech, something that you do not have. Be respectful....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: And, just to confirm, this issue arises as High School Students get college credit by taking classes labeled college level, and also if they go to camp at a college during summer?
Summer camp at a college doesn’t usually grant college credit.
Really depends. My kid went to UMD and Boston U summer programs and got credit for all the classes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's so common at selective schools that you aren't special if you come in with credit. You're normal. Average.
Indeed, this should be obvious to anyone paying even the slightest attention to high school class choices and college admissions.
It’s common at most colleges. The credits are accepted and my kid didn’t have any problems with taking upper level courses their freshman year. Kid said the ap courses were in some cases harder than the college course. Kid would tell you college was much easier because of the rigor of the ap classes.
Also disabuse yourself of the notion that parents are pushing this trend to save money. The kids are so competitive in hs that kids feel like they have to take ap classes. I argued with my kid for months because kid loaded up with too many ap classes. Kid refused to back down. I know other parents who went to the principal to try to drag their kid out of some ap classes. Most of the parents I knew agreed that it was insane but by hs the kids who are academically talented are intense about competing with each other.
Anonymous wrote:why rush getting out of college, you get so much more out of 4 or 5 years than 3, academically, socially, fun, etc
I would rather my kid take a biology class at a university taught by a well respected college professor than some disgruntled high school teacher with 3 years on the job and no real world experience with a world class lab.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why rush getting out of college, you get so much more out of 4 or 5 years than 3, academically, socially, fun, etc
I would rather my kid take a biology class at a university taught by a well respected college professor than some disgruntled high school teacher with 3 years on the job and no real world experience with a world class lab.
My DS graduated from UVA college of Engineering in 3 years because the school accepted over 30+ credits from his high school AP courses. He graduated in May '23 in three years, and I gave him 44K, the money I would have to pay for his last year at UVA, to travel the world before he comes back and either starts grad school or works for the NSA. Staying in school for 4 or 5 years only benefits the university, NOT you.
Btw, some of those "disgruntled" HS teachers have degrees from MIT or CalTech, something that you do not have. Be respectful....
When he applies for jobs or tries to create something on his own, he's going to be competing against people with a full 4-year education, some including a masters or a double major.
He also missed out on building connections with the top students at his school who spent the 4th year doing the most advanced work leading to stronger post-college placements.
Anonymous wrote:The one with more work experience. And for your second question, it's because an associates degree limits your earning potential in a way a college degree does not.Anonymous wrote:For example does a biotech company prefer to hire electrical engineer with the minimum qualifications, or an electrical engineer with the second major or a minor in biology, or half of a masters degree? Why not get an associates degree and then spend 3 years touring the world with the savings?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why rush getting out of college, you get so much more out of 4 or 5 years than 3, academically, socially, fun, etc
I would rather my kid take a biology class at a university taught by a well respected college professor than some disgruntled high school teacher with 3 years on the job and no real world experience with a world class lab.
My DS graduated from UVA college of Engineering in 3 years because the school accepted over 30+ credits from his high school AP courses. He graduated in May '23 in three years, and I gave him 44K, the money I would have to pay for his last year at UVA, to travel the world before he comes back and either starts grad school or works for the NSA. Staying in school for 4 or 5 years only benefits the university, NOT you.
Btw, some of those "disgruntled" HS teachers have degrees from MIT or CalTech, something that you do not have. Be respectful....
When he applies for jobs or tries to create something on his own, he's going to be competing against people with a full 4-year education, some including a masters or a double major.
He also missed out on building connections with the top students at his school who spent the 4th year doing the most advanced work leading to stronger post-college placements.
NP. Why would an employer prefer someone who took 4 years for the same degree that PP’s child got in 3? On top of that he’ll have life experience and possibly deeper understanding of a foreign language and other cultures depending on where he travels to.
Anonymous wrote:None of those are upper level.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DS and many of his friends are going to be sophomores when they start college.
I think they need 24 credits so about 7 AP Classes?
Can be 4 or 5 classes (tests) , depending on school, if you score a 5 on the intensive upper level subjects like Calc BC, Chem, History or Language/Literature.
https://www.transfercredit.umd.edu/plc/APGenEd.pdf
None of those are upper level.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DS and many of his friends are going to be sophomores when they start college.
I think they need 24 credits so about 7 AP Classes?
Can be 4 or 5 classes (tests) , depending on school, if you score a 5 on the intensive upper level subjects like Calc BC, Chem, History or Language/Literature.
https://www.transfercredit.umd.edu/plc/APGenEd.pdf
The one with more work experience. And for your second question, it's because an associates degree limits your earning potential in a way a college degree does not.Anonymous wrote:For example does a biotech company prefer to hire electrical engineer with the minimum qualifications, or an electrical engineer with the second major or a minor in biology, or half of a masters degree? Why not get an associates degree and then spend 3 years touring the world with the savings?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why rush getting out of college, you get so much more out of 4 or 5 years than 3, academically, socially, fun, etc
I would rather my kid take a biology class at a university taught by a well respected college professor than some disgruntled high school teacher with 3 years on the job and no real world experience with a world class lab.
My DS graduated from UVA college of Engineering in 3 years because the school accepted over 30+ credits from his high school AP courses. He graduated in May '23 in three years, and I gave him 44K, the money I would have to pay for his last year at UVA, to travel the world before he comes back and either starts grad school or works for the NSA. Staying in school for 4 or 5 years only benefits the university, NOT you.
Btw, some of those "disgruntled" HS teachers have degrees from MIT or CalTech, something that you do not have. Be respectful....
When he applies for jobs or tries to create something on his own, he's going to be competing against people with a full 4-year education, some including a masters or a double major.
He also missed out on building connections with the top students at his school who spent the 4th year doing the most advanced work leading to stronger post-college placements.
NP. Why would an employer prefer someone who took 4 years for the same degree that PP’s child got in 3? On top of that he’ll have life experience and possibly deeper understanding of a foreign language and other cultures depending on where he travels to.
Which school and which major?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's so common at selective schools that you aren't special if you come in with credit. You're normal. Average.
Indeed, this should be obvious to anyone paying even the slightest attention to high school class choices and college admissions.
It’s common at most colleges. The credits are accepted and my kid didn’t have any problems with taking upper level courses their freshman year. Kid said the ap courses were in some cases harder than the college course. Kid would tell you college was much easier because of the rigor of the ap classes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:*good students saved more money by getting full rides at same state school.
Who got the full ride other than under represented minority students? They are rare.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DS and many of his friends are going to be sophomores when they start college.
I think they need 24 credits so about 7 AP Classes?
Anonymous wrote:If we are bragging... Mine will be a junior after first semester
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:why rush getting out of college, you get so much more out of 4 or 5 years than 3, academically, socially, fun, etc
I would rather my kid take a biology class at a university taught by a well respected college professor than some disgruntled high school teacher with 3 years on the job and no real world experience with a world class lab.
My DS graduated from UVA college of Engineering in 3 years because the school accepted over 30+ credits from his high school AP courses. He graduated in May '23 in three years, and I gave him 44K, the money I would have to pay for his last year at UVA, to travel the world before he comes back and either starts grad school or works for the NSA. Staying in school for 4 or 5 years only benefits the university, NOT you.
Btw, some of those "disgruntled" HS teachers have degrees from MIT or CalTech, something that you do not have. Be respectful....
When he applies for jobs or tries to create something on his own, he's going to be competing against people with a full 4-year education, some including a masters or a double major.
He also missed out on building connections with the top students at his school who spent the 4th year doing the most advanced work leading to stronger post-college placements.
NP. Why would an employer prefer someone who took 4 years for the same degree that PP’s child got in 3? On top of that he’ll have life experience and possibly deeper understanding of a foreign language and other cultures depending on where he travels to.