Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:25 out of 99 got into UVA from Wakefield vs 41 out of 241 at Yorktown.
So a higher % of Wakefield students got in than Yorktown students? Or do I not know what to do math lol.
Nearly 25% of Wakefield students compared to 17% of Yorktown kids (out of those that applied)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:25 out of 99 got into UVA from Wakefield vs 41 out of 241 at Yorktown.
So a higher % of Wakefield students got in than Yorktown students? Or do I not know what to do math lol.
Nearly 25% of Wakefield students compared to 17% of Yorktown kids (out of those that applied)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate that we have to have this argument again and again. College admission rates or statistics do not necessarily indicate anything about the teaching or quality of the school. They do show that the student body is likely high income, has educated parents, and values education. Yes, all those things matter when it comes to student experience but it doesn't not necessarily mean your kid is getting a better education.
Similar kids with similar stats are getting into similar schools at all Arlington high schools.
I’m the PP who posted about UVa taking 10% from W&L and YHS. You aren’t correct—at least as to UVa. Check the Arlington magazine numbers. I’m not saying your education is worse at Wakefield or that there aren’t tons of bright kids or that kids aren’t getting in to top schools from Wakefield. I am merely saying what every rational person understands; the population at Wakefield has greater socioeconomic challenges which is reflected in the college outcomes. Period. That’s it. No judgment. But Wakefield people will still get mad. And I also people that it can be advantageous for certain kids who do very well at Wakefield to be coming from the more disadvantaged school (in terms of college placement).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“That environment” would you care to explain what you think “that environment” is that’s so scary
Scary? Oh geez lady. Hyperbole much?
I acknowledge that there are significant disparities between W&L and YHS as compared to Wakefield — college admission results being a result of many of those. Are you pretending it’s exactly the same as the other two (large) public schools? And, 100%, people everyday choose NOT to send their children to Wakefield. In this county alone, are the N Arlington parents lining up to transfer this kids to Wakefield? Nope.
Actually, there are quite a few of us N Arlington families zoned for YHS who send our kids to WHS for the immersion program. There are no neighborhood transfers to Wakefield, because there’s no room.
Actually how many is “quite a few” relative to the populations of W&L and YHS? Actually you are in the vast vast tiny minority. Super glad you exist and all but just because you can point to an anecdote does not invalidate the premise that N Arlington families don’t want Wakefield.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“That environment” would you care to explain what you think “that environment” is that’s so scary
Scary? Oh geez lady. Hyperbole much?
I acknowledge that there are significant disparities between W&L and YHS as compared to Wakefield — college admission results being a result of many of those. Are you pretending it’s exactly the same as the other two (large) public schools? And, 100%, people everyday choose NOT to send their children to Wakefield. In this county alone, are the N Arlington parents lining up to transfer this kids to Wakefield? Nope.
Anonymous wrote:25 out of 99 got into UVA from Wakefield vs 41 out of 241 at Yorktown.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate that we have to have this argument again and again. College admission rates or statistics do not necessarily indicate anything about the teaching or quality of the school. They do show that the student body is likely high income, has educated parents, and values education. Yes, all those things matter when it comes to student experience but it doesn't not necessarily mean your kid is getting a better education.
Similar kids with similar stats are getting into similar schools at all Arlington high schools.
I’m the PP who posted about UVa taking 10% from W&L and YHS. You aren’t correct—at least as to UVa. Check the Arlington magazine numbers. I’m not saying your education is worse at Wakefield or that there aren’t tons of bright kids or that kids aren’t getting in to top schools from Wakefield. I am merely saying what every rational person understands; the population at Wakefield has greater socioeconomic challenges which is reflected in the college outcomes. Period. That’s it. No judgment. But Wakefield people will still get mad. And I also people that it can be advantageous for certain kids who do very well at Wakefield to be coming from the more disadvantaged school (in terms of college placement).
Not that PP, but you seem to be ignoring how many kids apply. For past few years at least, 20-25% of kids applying to UVA are accepted from ALL THREE comprehensive APS high schools. Fewer kids from WHS apply to begin with. But the percentages are roughly the same (actually sometimes a little lower for YHS because so many apply).
Curious how you would know this? Admittance data — but not matriculation data — is published by Arlington magazine. How do you know how many kids from each HS in Arlington apply and are admitted?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate that we have to have this argument again and again. College admission rates or statistics do not necessarily indicate anything about the teaching or quality of the school. They do show that the student body is likely high income, has educated parents, and values education. Yes, all those things matter when it comes to student experience but it doesn't not necessarily mean your kid is getting a better education.
Similar kids with similar stats are getting into similar schools at all Arlington high schools.
I’m the PP who posted about UVa taking 10% from W&L and YHS. You aren’t correct—at least as to UVa. Check the Arlington magazine numbers. I’m not saying your education is worse at Wakefield or that there aren’t tons of bright kids or that kids aren’t getting in to top schools from Wakefield. I am merely saying what every rational person understands; the population at Wakefield has greater socioeconomic challenges which is reflected in the college outcomes. Period. That’s it. No judgment. But Wakefield people will still get mad. And I also people that it can be advantageous for certain kids who do very well at Wakefield to be coming from the more disadvantaged school (in terms of college placement).
Not that PP, but you seem to be ignoring how many kids apply. For past few years at least, 20-25% of kids applying to UVA are accepted from ALL THREE comprehensive APS high schools. Fewer kids from WHS apply to begin with. But the percentages are roughly the same (actually sometimes a little lower for YHS because so many apply).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“That environment” would you care to explain what you think “that environment” is that’s so scary
Scary? Oh geez lady. Hyperbole much?
I acknowledge that there are significant disparities between W&L and YHS as compared to Wakefield — college admission results being a result of many of those. Are you pretending it’s exactly the same as the other two (large) public schools? And, 100%, people everyday choose NOT to send their children to Wakefield. In this county alone, are the N Arlington parents lining up to transfer this kids to Wakefield? Nope.
Actually, there are quite a few of us N Arlington families zoned for YHS who send our kids to WHS for the immersion program. There are no neighborhood transfers to Wakefield, because there’s no room.
Actually how many is “quite a few” relative to the populations of W&L and YHS? Actually you are in the vast vast tiny minority. Super glad you exist and all but just because you can point to an anecdote does not invalidate the premise that N Arlington families don’t want Wakefield.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hate that we have to have this argument again and again. College admission rates or statistics do not necessarily indicate anything about the teaching or quality of the school. They do show that the student body is likely high income, has educated parents, and values education. Yes, all those things matter when it comes to student experience but it doesn't not necessarily mean your kid is getting a better education.
Similar kids with similar stats are getting into similar schools at all Arlington high schools.
I’m the PP who posted about UVa taking 10% from W&L and YHS. You aren’t correct—at least as to UVa. Check the Arlington magazine numbers. I’m not saying your education is worse at Wakefield or that there aren’t tons of bright kids or that kids aren’t getting in to top schools from Wakefield. I am merely saying what every rational person understands; the population at Wakefield has greater socioeconomic challenges which is reflected in the college outcomes. Period. That’s it. No judgment. But Wakefield people will still get mad. And I also people that it can be advantageous for certain kids who do very well at Wakefield to be coming from the more disadvantaged school (in terms of college placement).
Anonymous wrote:I hate that we have to have this argument again and again. College admission rates or statistics do not necessarily indicate anything about the teaching or quality of the school. They do show that the student body is likely high income, has educated parents, and values education. Yes, all those things matter when it comes to student experience but it doesn't not necessarily mean your kid is getting a better education.
Similar kids with similar stats are getting into similar schools at all Arlington high schools.