Anonymous wrote:What I don’t get is why would someone choose to see a social worker over a psychologist if neither accept insurance? The whole advantage of seeing a social worker was that formerly, a lot of them took insurance. So even if they had less training, it was more financially practical to see a msw. Especially for problems requiring many sessions; that was the trade off.
It seems like many social workers are doing cash only now, here and in nyc…so why pay that much as a patient when for a few dollars more you can see a psychologist? It would be like if your pcp went concierge then all the nurse practitioner pc practices in the area did the same. Who would pay a concierge retainer for an np when roughly the same money could get you an md? What am I missing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What I don’t get is why would someone choose to see a social worker over a psychologist if neither accept insurance? The whole advantage of seeing a social worker was that formerly, a lot of them took insurance. So even if they had less training, it was more financially practical to see a msw. Especially for problems requiring many sessions; that was the trade off.
It seems like many social workers are doing cash only now, here and in nyc…so why pay that much as a patient when for a few dollars more you can see a psychologist? It would be like if your pcp went concierge then all the nurse practitioner pc practices in the area did the same. Who would pay a concierge retainer for an np when roughly the same money could get you an md? What am I missing?
I went with a lcsw because that was who had room on her waitlist and because she had professional experience with trauma. She has listened to some of my horrific stories and never flinched and, after my deductible was paid, it costs < than $10 a session. I worked with a psychiatrist years ago and all she wanted to do was talk about my father.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My psychiatrist who functions mainly as a therapist to most of his patients works 7am-10pm M-F with 20 minutes for lunch and spends half the weekend doing charts. Pays a bookkeeper to do billing. He does take insurance but he must be absolutely raking it in.
A experience psychiatrist who who takes insurance for weekly therapy? He’s a mega unicorn. Non-existent in NYC.
Or, maybe he is interesting in helping people from many different backgrounds, not just the wealthy self pay population.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My psychiatrist who functions mainly as a therapist to most of his patients works 7am-10pm M-F with 20 minutes for lunch and spends half the weekend doing charts. Pays a bookkeeper to do billing. He does take insurance but he must be absolutely raking it in.
A experience psychiatrist who who takes insurance for weekly therapy? He’s a mega unicorn. Non-existent in NYC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a teacher and would say look into the career. We constantly hear about kids in crisis and how they can’t get in to see a therapist because there is a shortage.
OP here. I’m a teacher right now and this is part of the reason why I’m considering being a therapist.
I’m so tired of being blamed for societal issues that are beyond my control. I feel like therapy is frequently the same way, where therapists are expected to fix everything in society — the phrase “go to therapy” seems way too common these days and is just a band aid for societal shifts. But it seems like a lucrative grift, and one I’m happy to jump on.
You will be a bad one and it will show.
You have no interest so don’t do it.
Anonymous wrote:My psychiatrist who functions mainly as a therapist to most of his patients works 7am-10pm M-F with 20 minutes for lunch and spends half the weekend doing charts. Pays a bookkeeper to do billing. He does take insurance but he must be absolutely raking it in.
Anonymous wrote:What I don’t get is why would someone choose to see a social worker over a psychologist if neither accept insurance? The whole advantage of seeing a social worker was that formerly, a lot of them took insurance. So even if they had less training, it was more financially practical to see a msw. Especially for problems requiring many sessions; that was the trade off.
It seems like many social workers are doing cash only now, here and in nyc…so why pay that much as a patient when for a few dollars more you can see a psychologist? It would be like if your pcp went concierge then all the nurse practitioner pc practices in the area did the same. Who would pay a concierge retainer for an np when roughly the same money could get you an md? What am I missing?