Anonymous wrote:I have one of these super popular names and in school there were a couple of us in the grade but I rarely meet people with my name now. The people I meet and know now are from a broader birth year range, not all concentrated in the same year or two, so there is much more variety. Popularity only seems to matter in school, not after.
Anonymous wrote:This is actually a hyperlocal decision.
Of the top 10 baby names from my kindergartener's birth year we have one Isabella, one Sophia, and that's it in his class. None of the top 10 boy's names. However we have two Maeves and two Cecilias (and I know of two more Cecilias in the school) and a bunch of multiples of less common but classic boys' names (what I call Thomas the Train names.) I have actually never even met a Liam.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Husband likes a baby name that was on the top 5 list last year and I’m hung up on it. I like the name, but hung up on it being super popular and baby being one of many in their class. FWIW I have a very unusual name that has benefited me so perhaps that is where my feelings stem from! Anyone else avoid popular baby names or use them regardless?
How does having an unusual name “benefit” you? That’s so weird.
I don’t understand this desire for scarcity when naming a child. It’s not like a name bestows uniqueness on the child. This mentality is just so bizarre.
Who cares if another child in class has the name?
And this isn’t the 1970s. The most popular names don’t even begin to approach the saturation levels of popular names from that era.
Anonymous wrote:Top 5? No. Top 10? No.
My son’s name was #19 the year he was born and I was bummed about that, but my husband and I really struggled to agree on a name and we both really liked it, so we went with it.
He’s starting PK3 this year. 32 kids total in the grade at school (2 classes). There’s another kid with his name, and I’m irrationally so mad about it. At least they put them in different classes. Still. Grrr.
Pick a different name.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the saturation level can be higher at micro levels
In my friend group, there are soooo many kids with the same names. Isabelle, Sophia and Ava are just crazy prevalent
In my extended family, there are 3 Audreys (different branches of the family tree)
It's funny because in my friend and broader social group, I think there is an imperative to give your kid a less popular name, which has led to funny situations where two friends have each given their babies born a few months a part the same name that is not even on the SSN list, or where another friend gave their kid a name outside the top 1000 and then there was a kid with the same name in our kids' preschool.
Names like Isabelle and Ava are rare in my circle (I know only one of each, and no Sophias at all, except for a cousin who gave her daughter that name but that child is now in college). I don't know any Audreys. I do know a Mia. I think the one top 10 name that is maybe oversaturated is Charlotte, though each of the Charlotte's I know goes by a different name (one Charlotte, one Lottie, one Charlie).
My takeaway is that giving a child a less popular name just for the sake of your kid having a more unusual name might be a fool's errand -- you will be sad if your kid with the name in the 900s winds up in a class with a kid with the same name. Instead, I think you just have to ignore the noise and pick the name you love the most. If your kid winds up sharing that name with other kids, well, at least it's a name you absolutely love, regardless of it's level of popularity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was born in 1970. My name was the most popular name from, I think, 1970 - 1984. There were at least 2 of us in each class. I hated it.
But "top 5" is different from that situation, if the name is #5 or even #3 or #4 (if that makes sense).
Hi, Jen!
Anonymous wrote:I think the saturation level can be higher at micro levels
In my friend group, there are soooo many kids with the same names. Isabelle, Sophia and Ava are just crazy prevalent
In my extended family, there are 3 Audreys (different branches of the family tree)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Only if the last name is not too common.
I think this is important…if you have a common last name, don’t also choose a common first name for your child
Anonymous wrote:Husband likes a baby name that was on the top 5 list last year and I’m hung up on it. I like the name, but hung up on it being super popular and baby being one of many in their class. FWIW I have a very unusual name that has benefited me so perhaps that is where my feelings stem from! Anyone else avoid popular baby names or use them regardless?