Anonymous wrote:Does it matter why a wedding is dry?
Say thank you for the invitation and come if you like
Leave it at that and don’t criticize, it’s not like the couple or family needs to show case their wealth. It is just a special day for them and they thought to invite you to share that day with them
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the hate for no kids weddings on this site. All etiquette experts say no kid weddings are absolutely fine, while many of the other items are faux pas.
I’m 45 and have been to a lot of weddings, and I think only two ever invited kids. Every other wedding I’ve attended is no kids.
I understand that sometimes people can’t attend a wedding if it’s no kids, because they don’t have childcare in a different city. No judgment if you can’t attend. DH and I have done some trade off weddings where only one of us attended because getting childcare was too much drama. It’s fine. We’ve also flown in family to watch the kids while we’ve gone out of town for weddings. And we’ve also used the hotel arranged babysitter for some weddings. All of these are fine options.
But for people who are like unilaterally writing off no kids weddings…. I feel sorry for them. They often refuse to separate from their kids, have never had a babysitter, or are highly anxious. It’s one thing to decline a no kid wedding because you’re unable to make it work (or you’re not close enough to the couple to put a ton of effort into making it work). But it’s another thing to refuse to make it work.
+1.
The weddings without kids are generally better anyways (food/alcohol/entertainment). If you can't leave your kid for a few hours do everyone else a favor and stay home
+2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the hate for no kids weddings on this site. All etiquette experts say no kid weddings are absolutely fine, while many of the other items are faux pas.
I’m 45 and have been to a lot of weddings, and I think only two ever invited kids. Every other wedding I’ve attended is no kids.
I understand that sometimes people can’t attend a wedding if it’s no kids, because they don’t have childcare in a different city. No judgment if you can’t attend. DH and I have done some trade off weddings where only one of us attended because getting childcare was too much drama. It’s fine. We’ve also flown in family to watch the kids while we’ve gone out of town for weddings. And we’ve also used the hotel arranged babysitter for some weddings. All of these are fine options.
But for people who are like unilaterally writing off no kids weddings…. I feel sorry for them. They often refuse to separate from their kids, have never had a babysitter, or are highly anxious. It’s one thing to decline a no kid wedding because you’re unable to make it work (or you’re not close enough to the couple to put a ton of effort into making it work). But it’s another thing to refuse to make it work.
+1.
The weddings without kids are generally better anyways (food/alcohol/entertainment). If you can't leave your kid for a few hours do everyone else a favor and stay home
Anonymous wrote:I’m honestly shocked by the number of people who say they “can’t get through” a dry wedding.
Anonymous wrote:Dry weddings - unless couple is recovering alcoholic
Destination weddings - an excuse to make everyone else foot the real cost of the wedding. Elope if you want but destination weddings are selfish.
Weddings of couples who ask for cash - if you need to ask them it’s not the “norm” in your family.
No-kids weddings - not a concern
No +1 weddings - not a concern
No open bar weddings - fine as long as there is still wine/beer.
Anonymous wrote:Okay several people have mentioned it. What on earth is the dollar dance?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay several people have mentioned it. What on earth is the dollar dance?
You pay a dollar to dance with the bride or groom.
Anonymous wrote:Okay several people have mentioned it. What on earth is the dollar dance?