Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Admission was 12.5% last year with a 75% yield. They're hanging in there.
What is your source for this information?
My neighbor's kid is joining next year and Maret was 1 of 2 schools their kid got into- the rest were rejected. That is what I believe is happening.
My neighbor's kid got into every top school including Sidwell and a Cathedral school (don't want to reveal gender) except for one and chose Maret.
The 8th graders going to Maret next year from my kid's school are not the sharpest tools in the toolkit.
Still bitter about that rejection, we see. Your kid will be fine wherever PP.
Not bitter, just better! Indeed, after being accepted to Maret, we are delighted with our decision to enroll in a different school. My comment about who got "in" is really geared toward highlighting the lack of academic rigor, class offerings, college acceptances for nonathletes and hooks that we found at Maret as a whole compared to our current school. Upon evaluating other schools' curricula, it became apparent that Maret's program was lacking. While we appreciate their inclusive approach towards a broader range of students it did not align with our specific requirements.
NP. There is literally only one athlete (maybe 2) of the top grads from last year that went to “top schools”, what are you talking about?
Anonymous wrote:Maret is weak and rudderless. Make a better choice for your child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Admission was 12.5% last year with a 75% yield. They're hanging in there.
What is your source for this information?
My neighbor's kid is joining next year and Maret was 1 of 2 schools their kid got into- the rest were rejected. That is what I believe is happening.
My neighbor's kid got into every top school including Sidwell and a Cathedral school (don't want to reveal gender) except for one and chose Maret.
The 8th graders going to Maret next year from my kid's school are not the sharpest tools in the toolkit.
8th is not an intake year. At most they take one. Try again but be honest this time
NP. I think PP meant last year’s 8th graders entering for 9th this fall, which is an entry year.
Adding that I was surprised at the kids going to Maret from our K-8 this fall. Not the top academic achievers at the school, but each seemed to be a good student and also an athlete of at least one sport. Small sample size, so it could be totally different next year.
Try harder, Maret troll. You can do so much better.
I am the PP you called a troll. This is the first time I posted on this (or any) Maret thread, which is why I started my post with NP.
Our children are at a K-8 that sends at least one child to Maret for 9th each year. I was sharing my observation from this year. Like I said, small sample size.
Hardly trolling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a kid at Maret and one at a different independent school. Here are some objective points to consider:
1. The school is on a block system in MS/US, with classes about 70 minutes per class. I know other schools do this as well. This type of block does not leave a lot of free time in the schedule (I think my kid has two study halls and a full day from 8:00-3:20ish). My other kid is at a school with 50 minute blocks. The long blocks didn’t work for him. 50 minutes is good.
2. Because of only having classes 3x/week, it’s really hard when you miss even one day of school, let alone two, if you are sick.
3. We have found the quality of the teaching to be wildly inconsistent (but I don’t think this issue is unique to Maret).
4. From what we can tell, there are more options for honors classes in STEM than in humanities. It looks like there is only one option for a history honors class. No options for English. This makes it harder for a kid to shine and show that he has taken harder classes if he isn’t a stem kid.
5. The sports are pretty terrible except basketball. This can be a positive in that it gives my kid an opportunity to play and have fun without pressure to win. My kid loves his sports and he tries really hard but sports aren’t his thing and he’s just happy to be on the field.
6. The school is progressive as long as you buy into their formula of progressive. If you don’t, don’t speak up.
7. I personally think Maret is more work than my other kid’s school. My kid has a lot more homework or at least takes a lot longer to do it than his older sibling.
8. The school did a large tuition hike last year. Don’t know what that means for the future.
My kid likes it there. As parents, we struggle with it.
I've seen this mentioned before. We are considering Maret for our middle schooler who loves writing. The bolded does give me pause. Does Maret give a reason why it doesn't offer Honors English classes? Seems like an easy thing to implement if there's demand for it. Does the school know there's a demand for this?
I don't think any of the Big 3 schools have honors English.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Admission was 12.5% last year with a 75% yield. They're hanging in there.
What is your source for this information?
My neighbor's kid is joining next year and Maret was 1 of 2 schools their kid got into- the rest were rejected. That is what I believe is happening.
My neighbor's kid got into every top school including Sidwell and a Cathedral school (don't want to reveal gender) except for one and chose Maret.
The 8th graders going to Maret next year from my kid's school are not the sharpest tools in the toolkit.
8th is not an intake year. At most they take one. Try again but be honest this time
NP. I think PP meant last year’s 8th graders entering for 9th this fall, which is an entry year.
Adding that I was surprised at the kids going to Maret from our K-8 this fall. Not the top academic achievers at the school, but each seemed to be a good student and also an athlete of at least one sport. Small sample size, so it could be totally different next year.
Try harder, Maret troll. You can do so much better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maret specialized in back room deals, cliques, and turning upper middle class kids into neo-marxists who still like brand shopping.
Can you explain what this means, please? We are enrolled there and I am concerned …
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Admission was 12.5% last year with a 75% yield. They're hanging in there.
What is your source for this information?
My neighbor's kid is joining next year and Maret was 1 of 2 schools their kid got into- the rest were rejected. That is what I believe is happening.
My neighbor's kid got into every top school including Sidwell and a Cathedral school (don't want to reveal gender) except for one and chose Maret.
The 8th graders going to Maret next year from my kid's school are not the sharpest tools in the toolkit.
8th is not an intake year. At most they take one. Try again but be honest this time
NP. I think PP meant last year’s 8th graders entering for 9th this fall, which is an entry year.
Adding that I was surprised at the kids going to Maret from our K-8 this fall. Not the top academic achievers at the school, but each seemed to be a good student and also an athlete of at least one sport. Small sample size, so it could be totally different next year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Admission was 12.5% last year with a 75% yield. They're hanging in there.
What is your source for this information?
My neighbor's kid is joining next year and Maret was 1 of 2 schools their kid got into- the rest were rejected. That is what I believe is happening.
My neighbor's kid got into every top school including Sidwell and a Cathedral school (don't want to reveal gender) except for one and chose Maret.
The 8th graders going to Maret next year from my kid's school are not the sharpest tools in the toolkit.
8th is not an intake year. At most they take one. Try again but be honest this time
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Admission was 12.5% last year with a 75% yield. They're hanging in there.
What is your source for this information?
My neighbor's kid is joining next year and Maret was 1 of 2 schools their kid got into- the rest were rejected. That is what I believe is happening.
My neighbor's kid got into every top school including Sidwell and a Cathedral school (don't want to reveal gender) except for one and chose Maret.
The 8th graders going to Maret next year from my kid's school are not the sharpest tools in the toolkit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maret specialized in back room deals, cliques, and turning upper middle class kids into neo-marxists who still like brand shopping.
Can you explain what this means, please? We are enrolled there and I am concerned …
Someone got fired from Maret and is upset.
What’s neo-marxist and brand shopping?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maret specialized in back room deals, cliques, and turning upper middle class kids into neo-marxists who still like brand shopping.
Can you explain what this means, please? We are enrolled there and I am concerned …
Someone got fired from Maret and is upset.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maret specialized in back room deals, cliques, and turning upper middle class kids into neo-marxists who still like brand shopping.
Can you explain what this means, please? We are enrolled there and I am concerned …