Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do not know why no one wants to go to WMS. It’s a great middle school. Fabulous teachers.
Maybe because I remember this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1999/07/08/parents-are-alarmed-by-an-unsettling-new-fad-in-middle-schools-oral-sex/4130d1ef-5e0f-4078-99ec-faa75fe294c5/
But generally speaking, WMS is richer, whiter and meaner than Hamm and I’d like my children to avoid the Washington Golf crowd as long as I can.
An article from 24 years ago. I can see why you’d be concerned.. I can promise you that the WMS crowd is not one hit snootier than the Taylor/Hamm crowd. Cut from the very same cloth.
Right???? This is what I find hilarious. It's the same people!!! The lack of self-awareness is completely astounding.
You're going to bring your positive Hamm energy to Williamsburg though and show them how it's done.
Anonymous wrote:Why did someone start this thread today? Has something happened since the pre-CIP report? Or do we think OP just found out about the pre-CIP report?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. And it's consistent with APS diversity goals.Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just let the Hamm walk zone stay at Hamm and bus everyone else to Williamsburg? Wouldn’t this keep everyone happy?
I don’t see how recreating the Rosslyn Island to Williamsburg is fine but moving immersion to Williamsburg is a nonstarter. It’s the exact same issues.
The majority of immersion students live in the zone for Gunston. That's much farther from Williamsburg.
+1. And the Rosslyn students go to Yorktown. Why send them to Hamm first? Include them in the WMS community as those students will be their peers at Yorktown.
The students in the Hamm walk one marked to be moved ALSO go to Yorktown, so that’s not a very convincing argument.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. And it's consistent with APS diversity goals.Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just let the Hamm walk zone stay at Hamm and bus everyone else to Williamsburg? Wouldn’t this keep everyone happy?
I don’t see how recreating the Rosslyn Island to Williamsburg is fine but moving immersion to Williamsburg is a nonstarter. It’s the exact same issues.
The majority of immersion students live in the zone for Gunston. That's much farther from Williamsburg.
+1. And the Rosslyn students go to Yorktown. Why send them to Hamm first? Include them in the WMS community as those students will be their peers at Yorktown.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do not know why no one wants to go to WMS. It’s a great middle school. Fabulous teachers.
Maybe because I remember this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1999/07/08/parents-are-alarmed-by-an-unsettling-new-fad-in-middle-schools-oral-sex/4130d1ef-5e0f-4078-99ec-faa75fe294c5/
But generally speaking, WMS is richer, whiter and meaner than Hamm and I’d like my children to avoid the Washington Golf crowd as long as I can.
An article from 24 years ago. I can see why you’d be concerned.. I can promise you that the WMS crowd is not one hit snootier than the Taylor/Hamm crowd. Cut from the very same cloth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m interested in other ways to relieve Gunston that don’t involve busing my kid to Williamsburg. And I understand that things may not work in my favor, but I want to be honest and open about trying other solutions that could work.
If I’m looking at the documents correctly, moving Immersion immediately solves Gunston’s overcrowding, correct? Sticking it at Kenmore (which has space but not enough for all of Immersion) means that some Kenmore kids need to go to other middle schools which creates this cascade effect, correct?
We need to not just say “don’t bus my kid when he can walk” but also “here’s what you can do instead.”
I also think high school alignment is an issue here.
If my child has to be bused, I can live with it as long as our planning units are not the only ones moved and he’s isolated from the majority of Taylor. If they’re going to split us up, they need to move a critical mass.
It looks like they could move Immersion to Williamsburg, tweak a few units with alignment issues, and then be done. No walk zones broken. Almost everyone moved with the school when Key moved despite dire warnings otherwise. People who are dedicated to the program will travel for it.
This is a dumb plan and I hope people speak out against this as an idea. It would kill the immersion program.
That’s exactly what you said about the Key move.
Key moved to a Central part of the county in an area with spanish speakers.
Do you remember the rhetoric? The move would destroy the program, families wouldn’t be able to move to the new building so the new neighborhood school would be crowded anyway, etc etc.
Williamsburg is a bad choice for location, but no one wants to be moved there. Why should neighborhood kids get moved instead of an option program that is optional?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do not know why no one wants to go to WMS. It’s a great middle school. Fabulous teachers.
Maybe because I remember this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1999/07/08/parents-are-alarmed-by-an-unsettling-new-fad-in-middle-schools-oral-sex/4130d1ef-5e0f-4078-99ec-faa75fe294c5/
But generally speaking, WMS is richer, whiter and meaner than Hamm and I’d like my children to avoid the Washington Golf crowd as long as I can.
Anonymous wrote:We moved elementary schools recently with the redistributing. Our elementary school feeds to the same middle school (Hamm) but splits for high school. It would be nice for some continuity. Also, would be nice if my DS doesn’t have to change schools again. It’s probably not possible to prevent kids who have had to change schools recently due to redistributing from having to do it again in middle school, but it would be nice. Luckily the options are all acceptable, but its hard to roll with the changes every few years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do not know why no one wants to go to WMS. It’s a great middle school. Fabulous teachers.
Maybe because I remember this: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1999/07/08/parents-are-alarmed-by-an-unsettling-new-fad-in-middle-schools-oral-sex/4130d1ef-5e0f-4078-99ec-faa75fe294c5/
But generally speaking, WMS is richer, whiter and meaner than Hamm and I’d like my children to avoid the Washington Golf crowd as long as I can.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. And it's consistent with APS diversity goals.Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just let the Hamm walk zone stay at Hamm and bus everyone else to Williamsburg? Wouldn’t this keep everyone happy?
I don’t see how recreating the Rosslyn Island to Williamsburg is fine but moving immersion to Williamsburg is a nonstarter. It’s the exact same issues.
The majority of immersion students live in the zone for Gunston. That's much farther from Williamsburg.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes. And it's consistent with APS diversity goals.Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just let the Hamm walk zone stay at Hamm and bus everyone else to Williamsburg? Wouldn’t this keep everyone happy?
I don’t see how recreating the Rosslyn Island to Williamsburg is fine but moving immersion to Williamsburg is a nonstarter. It’s the exact same issues.
Anonymous wrote:Yes. And it's consistent with APS diversity goals.Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just let the Hamm walk zone stay at Hamm and bus everyone else to Williamsburg? Wouldn’t this keep everyone happy?
Anonymous wrote:Yes. And it's consistent with APS diversity goals.Anonymous wrote:Why don’t they just let the Hamm walk zone stay at Hamm and bus everyone else to Williamsburg? Wouldn’t this keep everyone happy?