Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
UMD costs 30K a year, total cost of attendance (COA = room, board, tuition, fees) for MD residents.
UVA costs about the same in-state, with some programs at $40K.
Most northeast SLACS were at around $77-80K when we visited them last summer. I hear Dartmouth an Duke are now at $90K a year COA. Georgetown and George Washington Universities in DC are at $85K this year. Some other private universities like Miami are now beyond the $90K a year COA.
Multiply by 4 and by number of kids, add in inflation, the fact that many students do not graduate on time, and the knowledge that so far, tuition costs have on average increased faster than inflation.
It isn’t true that tuition is outpacing inflation anymore.
Anonymous wrote:
UMD costs 30K a year, total cost of attendance (COA = room, board, tuition, fees) for MD residents.
UVA costs about the same in-state, with some programs at $40K.
Most northeast SLACS were at around $77-80K when we visited them last summer. I hear Dartmouth an Duke are now at $90K a year COA. Georgetown and George Washington Universities in DC are at $85K this year. Some other private universities like Miami are now beyond the $90K a year COA.
Multiply by 4 and by number of kids, add in inflation, the fact that many students do not graduate on time, and the knowledge that so far, tuition costs have on average increased faster than inflation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We plan on contributing until the accounts hits $500k. Whatever the kids don't use will go the their children. This is a very efficient way to transfer wealth.
What will your children do? They need somewhere to contribute to fund too. Or is the idea that you pay for everything because your descendants cannot measure up? Or because economy has broken and will stay broken for generations so only the beneficiaries of capitalism raiders will have funding?
The money is backflowing in the pipes!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We plan on contributing until the accounts hits $500k. Whatever the kids don't use will go the their children. This is a very efficient way to transfer wealth.
Yes it is. We don’t plan to close our kids accounts. One is thru college other is a junior. We plan to start contributing again in a few years exactly for that reason—-once it becomes apparent there will be grandkids, it is an excellent way to avoid estate taxes and help the next generations. We could easily find the next two generations of education
Next generations living off the fat of extreme wealth ($25M per dead married couple!) goes beyond helping into being destructive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We plan on contributing until the accounts hits $500k. Whatever the kids don't use will go the their children. This is a very efficient way to transfer wealth.
What will your children do? They need somewhere to contribute to fund too. Or is the idea that you pay for everything because your descendants cannot measure up? Or because economy has broken and will stay broken for generations so only the beneficiaries of capitalism raiders will have funding?
The money is backflowing in the pipes!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For us fully fund for one kid means pilot license plus 4-year degree (so like $400k?) and for another it will likely include medical school. Our desire to fully fund means we'll be working until we're 70.
Why does it take 50 years to pay for an education. Something is terribly wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As someone who has worked a long time in admissions to for a top 10 grad program, I’ve learned that private undergrad gives no advantage to kids looking to go to grad school. Maybe it does for kids in certain fields who don’t plan on grad school, but otherwise it was a completely wasted expense.
It’s worth it for a better education.
What makes you think private undergrad is "a better education" than public? (I went to an Ivy League undergrad but don't particularly think that makes me better educated than anyone else.)
I went to a top 20 LAC for undergrad and a public ivy for grad school, where I was a TA for years, then taught at a not-top-but-not-terrible LAC. You can get a good education at a lot of places, and you can slack at most places if you choose the right major. The lesser institutions include a lot of friction on your way to a degree, and you may think that builds character or you may think that's wasted energy. I wanted my kids to have the option of choosing (they did not all choose):
smaller classes
better access to classes
more-predictable course offerings
better access to professors
an easier time getting accommodations when you're having a crisis
no caps on majors
four years of college housing if you want it
professors who can uphold standards in the face of unhappy parents threatening that their kid needs a better grade or they're taking their tuition and going elsewhere
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For us fully fund for one kid means pilot license plus 4-year degree (so like $400k?) and for another it will likely include medical school. Our desire to fully fund means we'll be working until we're 70.
Why does it take 50 years to pay for an education. Something is terribly wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We plan on contributing until the accounts hits $500k. Whatever the kids don't use will go the their children. This is a very efficient way to transfer wealth.
Yes it is. We don’t plan to close our kids accounts. One is thru college other is a junior. We plan to start contributing again in a few years exactly for that reason—-once it becomes apparent there will be grandkids, it is an excellent way to avoid estate taxes and help the next generations. We could easily find the next two generations of education
Anonymous wrote:We plan on contributing until the accounts hits $500k. Whatever the kids don't use will go the their children. This is a very efficient way to transfer wealth.