Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe they should prioritize booting cars with unpaid tickets? Seems like that can keep them busy for years based on recent news reports.
Those people aren't going to follow the rules anyway. If they don't pay their tickers, they are just going to cut off the boot.
So DC shouldn't bother with booting, they should just impound the car and not give it back?
That would keep these people from earning a living and would inequitable since these people don't have WFH jobs. So, no. The people that should be penalized are those thaf follow the rules. Otherwise, enforcement is too expensive.
You are assuming all speeders are poor?
A LOT of speed cameras are placed in poor areas. More than in rich areas.
NP
Then put more in rich areas. People who drive recklessly should lose the privilege of driving, regardless of how much money they make.
Anonymous wrote:Boot cars and not prosecute car jackers? Got it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you guys put up with tons of traffic tickets in an effort to curb bad driving from MD/VA residents. Y'all still haven't learned that we don't suffer consequences from ignoring DC tickets.
I don’t put up with lots of traffic tickets because I don’t drive recklessly. Not something you’d understand.
You don't need to drive recklessly to get one of the numerous camera violations I've thrown in the trash. But enjoy paying $150 for stopping 0.5" in front of the line at a red light.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you guys put up with tons of traffic tickets in an effort to curb bad driving from MD/VA residents. Y'all still haven't learned that we don't suffer consequences from ignoring DC tickets.
I don’t put up with lots of traffic tickets because I don’t drive recklessly. Not something you’d understand.
You don't need to drive recklessly to get one of the numerous camera violations I've thrown in the trash. But enjoy paying $150 for stopping 0.5" in front of the line at a red light.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So you guys put up with tons of traffic tickets in an effort to curb bad driving from MD/VA residents. Y'all still haven't learned that we don't suffer consequences from ignoring DC tickets.
I don’t put up with lots of traffic tickets because I don’t drive recklessly. Not something you’d understand.
Anonymous wrote:So you guys put up with tons of traffic tickets in an effort to curb bad driving from MD/VA residents. Y'all still haven't learned that we don't suffer consequences from ignoring DC tickets.
Anonymous wrote:So you guys put up with tons of traffic tickets in an effort to curb bad driving from MD/VA residents. Y'all still haven't learned that we don't suffer consequences from ignoring DC tickets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe they should prioritize booting cars with unpaid tickets? Seems like that can keep them busy for years based on recent news reports.
Those people aren't going to follow the rules anyway. If they don't pay their tickers, they are just going to cut off the boot.
So DC shouldn't bother with booting, they should just impound the car and not give it back?
That would keep these people from earning a living and would inequitable since these people don't have WFH jobs. So, no. The people that should be penalized are those thaf follow the rules. Otherwise, enforcement is too expensive.
You are assuming all speeders are poor?
A LOT of speed cameras are placed in poor areas. More than in rich areas.
NP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe they should prioritize booting cars with unpaid tickets? Seems like that can keep them busy for years based on recent news reports.
Those people aren't going to follow the rules anyway. If they don't pay their tickers, they are just going to cut off the boot.
So DC shouldn't bother with booting, they should just impound the car and not give it back?
That would keep these people from earning a living and would inequitable since these people don't have WFH jobs. So, no. The people that should be penalized are those thaf follow the rules. Otherwise, enforcement is too expensive.
You are assuming all speeders are poor?
A LOT of speed cameras are placed in poor areas. More than in rich areas.
NP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe they should prioritize booting cars with unpaid tickets? Seems like that can keep them busy for years based on recent news reports.
Those people aren't going to follow the rules anyway. If they don't pay their tickers, they are just going to cut off the boot.
So DC shouldn't bother with booting, they should just impound the car and not give it back?
That would keep these people from earning a living and would inequitable since these people don't have WFH jobs. So, no. The people that should be penalized are those thaf follow the rules. Otherwise, enforcement is too expensive.
You are assuming all speeders are poor?