Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vienna has a lot of working class folks that inherited homes
Oh no! Not working class.
Anonymous wrote:Vienna has a lot of working class folks that inherited homes
Anonymous wrote:They’re literally almost the same. I xcan’t believe this has gone on for 5 pages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both neighborhoods do not allow tear downs as far as I know, so the housing stock is aging. I would rather live in a new build in the McLean HS district than in one of those neighborhoods. I guess some of the homes are renovated though.
Langley Oaks and McLean Hamlet both have (overly ?) active HOAs with lots of rules and mandatory HOA fees. We avoided both in order to stay away from the HOA circus. Both neighborhoods have aging houses, with some better kept up than others.
I hear anecdotes suggesting McLean Hamlet recently has allowed at least one tear-down, but I am not certain if that anecdote is true. At least one family we know picked McLean Hamlet only because of the swim team, even though they did not particularly like the (older, smaller, & dated) house they bought. They say they will move as soon as their last kid starts college.
Anonymous wrote:Both are on the ugly side of McLean.
Anonymous wrote:Both neighborhoods do not allow tear downs as far as I know, so the housing stock is aging. I would rather live in a new build in the McLean HS district than in one of those neighborhoods. I guess some of the homes are renovated though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Come on, McLean is wealthier than Vienna. Vienna is almost an ex-burb.
I think the consensus of reasonable voices here is that McLean is wealthier in that it is unmatched in its wealthier neighborhoods. But there is no way that you can say that any McLean neighborhood is wealthier/appealing than any Vienna neighborhood.
I think this thread would have ended if McLean Hamlet was not brought up, because that is indeed a neighborhood that is very affordable and middle class, - and there is no way one can claim it is better than all of Vienna. Most of Vienna is in a different league (not on par with the best of McLean, but common at least double McLean Hamlet). And yes Vienna does have neighborhoods that are the same or lower than McLean Hamlet.
You need to just drive there once to see how middle class McLean Hamlet, and it could never gentrify to the extent of other neighborhoods because it bounds both 495 and the Toll Road giving you constant noise from different direction. Poster was right to compare it to Pimmet Hills.
Anonymous wrote:Come on, McLean is wealthier than Vienna. Vienna is almost an ex-burb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one would prefer Hamlet over Langley Oakes. They should not even be compared. Hamlet is more comparable to Pimmet Hills than anywhere in McLean (I think parts of it is in McLean).
It's Langley Oaks, not Oakes.
I could see some people preferring McLean Hamlet over Langley Oaks. It's closer to Tysons and has its own neighborhood pool. The houses in Langley Oaks are newer and larger, but it's kind of sterile. Of course, the neighborhoods in Vienna like Langley Oaks (like some of the areas in 22181 off Lawyers Road) cost less because they are in Vienna rather than McLean, zoned to lower-ranked schools, and further away from DC.
As someone who looked in both of these neighborhoods, the houses in Mclean Hamlet are MUCH MUCH smaller and older. Lots of older split level homes in Mclean Hamlet vs bigger colonials in Langley Oaks. Langley Oaks is also more expensive - even the older, not updated homes go for over 1.5 now.