Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Transplant_1 wrote:Even if BCC has a high FARMs rate, the UMC students will still have to put the same "pressure" on themselves to be competitive for selective colleges. And there's probably a large cohort of them creating "competition" and "pressure." So I keep wondering, what makes Whitman a pressure cooker. I appreciate the example of the child practicing SATs since 7th grade. And the reality of the amount of external coaching/training/lessons. But wouldn't that wealth factor exist in BCC as well? It draws from one of the wealthiest areas in the country.
Every school has such a cohort. There isn't anything special about Whitman. Sure, it's a fine school but RMIB makes it look easy by comparison.
The IB Diploma Programme has exactly the same requirements at all of the schools that offer the IB Diploma Programme.
Actually the two schools are roughly on a par, and if you look at historical evidence of where the kids end up, Whitman usually beats RMIB just slightly. And I think that's because a lot more kids at RMIB want to get into UMD
Whitman isn't even in the same league as RM. Just look at the college outcomes listed by Bethesda Beat. It isn't even close.
Whitman is precisely what you'd expect for a school that is 95%+ white/Asian with almost 0% FARMS. It isn't anything special. It just has fewer students dragging down its test averages than other schools because of the boundary gerrymandering that allows this kind of segregation to continue.
You clearly have no idea what this word actually means. Segregation is illegal in the United States. Look it up, moron.
NP. It doesn’t seem wildly inaccurate to use the term “segregation” to refer to boundaries drawn and maintained to reinforce economic homogeneity within a school community.
Anonymous wrote:I wonder how kids do at the various schools after high school - like without the support systems and added aid or pressure, do Whitman students continue to excel generally in the college atmosphere, or do some flounder more or less than would be expected. … is there a marked difference between students at the various high school and their achievement levels after high school? Anyone know of any reports or research done as a follow up to high school achievement ?
Anonymous wrote:Whitman had a bunch of suicides a few years back.
Anonymous wrote:How is the mental health of these Whitman students after being in such a cut throat environment?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Transplant_1 wrote:Even if BCC has a high FARMs rate, the UMC students will still have to put the same "pressure" on themselves to be competitive for selective colleges. And there's probably a large cohort of them creating "competition" and "pressure." So I keep wondering, what makes Whitman a pressure cooker. I appreciate the example of the child practicing SATs since 7th grade. And the reality of the amount of external coaching/training/lessons. But wouldn't that wealth factor exist in BCC as well? It draws from one of the wealthiest areas in the country.
Every school has such a cohort. There isn't anything special about Whitman. Sure, it's a fine school but RMIB makes it look easy by comparison.
The IB Diploma Programme has exactly the same requirements at all of the schools that offer the IB Diploma Programme.
Actually the two schools are roughly on a par, and if you look at historical evidence of where the kids end up, Whitman usually beats RMIB just slightly. And I think that's because a lot more kids at RMIB want to get into UMD
Whitman isn't even in the same league as RM. Just look at the college outcomes listed by Bethesda Beat. It isn't even close.
Whitman is precisely what you'd expect for a school that is 95%+ white/Asian with almost 0% FARMS. It isn't anything special. It just has fewer students dragging down its test averages than other schools because of the boundary gerrymandering that allows this kind of segregation to continue.
You clearly have no idea what this word actually means. Segregation is illegal in the United States. Look it up, moron.
NP. It doesn’t seem wildly inaccurate to use the term “segregation” to refer to boundaries drawn and maintained to reinforce economic homogeneity within a school community.
Anonymous wrote:Whitman had a bunch of suicides a few years back.
Anonymous wrote:It’s strange that it’s such a pressure cooker and yet so few get into top tier schools.
Anonymous wrote:W schools (and lesser degree BCC) have high percentage of asian families which put education first. Yes, RMIB is incredibly hard driven. Far more so than any of the W-schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s strange that it’s such a pressure cooker and yet so few get into top tier schools.
But that's the reason. Top tier schools tend to admit 2-3 kids per school because they want geographic diversity from around the country and have a relatively small class size. When there are a lot of academically qualified students at a school, they are all competing against each other to stand out and look "unique" (which ironically they don't, because everyone is doing exactly the same.)
this x 100%
Anonymous wrote:I don't think BCC belongs in the same category as the Ws anymore, honestly. Its FARMS rate is almost 20% now, and it is projected to surpass that in another 2 years. It's an affluent school yes, but not at the same level as the Ws. It's more like RM/Sherwood level of affluence now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Transplant_1 wrote:Even if BCC has a high FARMs rate, the UMC students will still have to put the same "pressure" on themselves to be competitive for selective colleges. And there's probably a large cohort of them creating "competition" and "pressure." So I keep wondering, what makes Whitman a pressure cooker. I appreciate the example of the child practicing SATs since 7th grade. And the reality of the amount of external coaching/training/lessons. But wouldn't that wealth factor exist in BCC as well? It draws from one of the wealthiest areas in the country.
Every school has such a cohort. There isn't anything special about Whitman. Sure, it's a fine school but RMIB makes it look easy by comparison.
The IB Diploma Programme has exactly the same requirements at all of the schools that offer the IB Diploma Programme.
Actually the two schools are roughly on a par, and if you look at historical evidence of where the kids end up, Whitman usually beats RMIB just slightly. And I think that's because a lot more kids at RMIB want to get into UMD
Whitman isn't even in the same league as RM. Just look at the college outcomes listed by Bethesda Beat. It isn't even close.
Whitman is precisely what you'd expect for a school that is 95%+ white/Asian with almost 0% FARMS. It isn't anything special. It just has fewer students dragging down its test averages than other schools because of the boundary gerrymandering that allows this kind of segregation to continue.
You clearly have no idea what this word actually means. Segregation is illegal in the United States. Look it up, moron.