Anonymous wrote:You wont be alive when it’s full size so whats the problem.
Anonymous wrote:I'm clearly in the minority here - I was so sad when my neighbor cut down all of their trees to make room for more lawn! I love trees. We have a gigantic tulip poplar in our backyard - it's easily 60 years old, huge, outer edge is 5' from the property line (which has a fence, the poplar has never bothered the fence). Luckily the neighbor on that side has kept all his trees and loves them, it's the other side that removed trees. We live on 1/3 acre and have around 20 mature trees in our yard - the giant poplar, oak, hickory, maple, holly, dogwood, cherry.
We do have a tree guy come out every 2 years to remove dead branches from all of the trees in our yard. Every once in a while a small branch will fall, but no branches big enough to do any damage in the 15 years we've been here.
Walking into the backyard in the summer is heaven. It's easily 15 degrees cooler under the trees than out in the sun. I really don't get why anyone would want to reduce summer shade in this climate.
Anonymous wrote:Why do so many idiots think they're entitled to plant whatever they want right on the property lines? Huge trees on property lines can dmage fences, foundations, sewer lines, and add thousands of dollars in extra costs other neighbors since they'll have to get their gutters unclogged regularly a lot more. Not to mention all of the risks for debris that can fall and damage structures..
If you want a gigantic tree in your yard, that's fine. Put it well in your property and away from others' homes and the property lines. If you insist putting a tree in property lines, use root barriers like a responsible person or simply go with far smaller dwarf trees that pose much less risk for structural damage to peoples' homes.
So much entitlement people feel the have over other peoples' property. You going to pay $80k when my home's foundation needs to be fixed when your tree's roots cause dage or pay $50k when your stupid tree destroyed my sewer line and the whole thing needs to be dug up?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Some people really hate/fear trees” is one of the things I’ve learned from dcum.
It's classy to have big, well-maintained trees
It's low class not have trees, cut down healthy trees, or try to destroy your neighbors trees
+1 Vandalizing your neighbor's property is a low-SES thing. Something the Boeberts or the Palins would do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A cup of Clorox midnight every night will solve your problem.
I tried this on a cherry tree and It didnt work. Tried for 3 months
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“Some people really hate/fear trees” is one of the things I’ve learned from dcum.
It's classy to have big, well-maintained trees
It's low class not have trees, cut down healthy trees, or try to destroy your neighbors trees
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A cup of Clorox midnight every night will solve your problem.
I was going to suggest gasoline…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP did you take care of the problem?
OP here. No, I'm not going to kill their tree in the middle of the night as some suggested. Thinking about installing a root barrier, though.
Anonymous wrote:OP did you take care of the problem?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why do so many idiots think they're entitled to plant whatever they want right on the property lines? Huge trees on property lines can dmage fences, foundations, sewer lines, and add thousands of dollars in extra costs other neighbors since they'll have to get their gutters unclogged regularly a lot more. Not to mention all of the risks for debris that can fall and damage structures..
If you want a gigantic tree in your yard, that's fine. Put it well in your property and away from others' homes and the property lines. If you insist putting a tree in property lines, use root barriers like a responsible person or simply go with far smaller dwarf trees that pose much less risk for structural damage to peoples' homes.
So much entitlement people feel the have over other peoples' property. You going to pay $80k when my home's foundation needs to be fixed when your tree's roots cause dage or pay $50k when your stupid tree destroyed my sewer line and the whole thing needs to be dug up?
OP didn’t say the tree was planted on the property line. It’s possible the OP’s house was expanded and now too close to the border. Trees increase property value. OP should thank their neighbor.
Trees only create nuisance value when they are planted inappropriately. We had to pay $5k to remove a gigantic silver maple that some idiot had planted 10 ft from our front window.
Do you know for certain it was planted? Some silver maples are volunteers, and they grow quickly. You have to pay attention to your yard and immediately remove volunteers.
Anonymous wrote:I'm clearly in the minority here - I was so sad when my neighbor cut down all of their trees to make room for more lawn! I love trees. We have a gigantic tulip poplar in our backyard - it's easily 60 years old, huge, outer edge is 5' from the property line (which has a fence, the poplar has never bothered the fence). Luckily the neighbor on that side has kept all his trees and loves them, it's the other side that removed trees. We live on 1/3 acre and have around 20 mature trees in our yard - the giant poplar, oak, hickory, maple, holly, dogwood, cherry.
We do have a tree guy come out every 2 years to remove dead branches from all of the trees in our yard. Every once in a while a small branch will fall, but no branches big enough to do any damage in the 15 years we've been here.
Walking into the backyard in the summer is heaven. It's easily 15 degrees cooler under the trees than out in the sun. I really don't get why anyone would want to reduce summer shade in this climate.