Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what did you do differently?
My middle schooler's IQ was just tested, and came back on the border between these two categories, according to the Hoagie's website. Apparently his score puts him in the top 0.03%. I guess I'm trying to figure out if this is information I need to do something with, or if I can just take these results and stick them in a drawer somewhere.
I think the problem is that a kid with an IQ of about 150 to 165 will be an ordinary bright Top 30 university student, not all that amazingly bright by the standards of a selective university.
You have to figure out how to get your son into tough enough courses that, by the time he’s at college, he’ll know how to study and how to get help if he finds something confusing.
If he sails through K-12, that means he’ll end up in college with a weaker education than many other equally bright, better-educated students, and he may not have any idea of what to do in a class that’s hard.
This is an absurd statement. There are roughly 20 million people of college age in the U.S. 0.03 percent of that is 6000-- in the entire country, spread among all colleges. That would put an average of 200 kids of that intelligence at each of the top 30 colleges, or 50 per entering class. Hardly "ordinary"
Huh. Smart kids tend to congregate at smart schools. They are not evenly distributed.
Most kids at top ivies have IQs in the range that OP describes. Her son will almost certainly be average in college. If he’s lucky.
Anonymous wrote:I have a profoundly gifted 12 yr old, who also has extremely high social skills, and is well-liked by both peers and adults. He is very confident but also has a deep level of empathy. I once had a friend of a friend who is a gifted specialist tell me to put him in a sport or activity that is new to him/will be a challenge. Learning that you have to work hard to get better at some things is so important to learn young. We found that activity to be swimming. While he generally is above average as an athlete, he's not nearly as fast as his peers who have been swimming much longer. And we have neglected to give him lessons at a young age, so he's having to work harder to keep up. It has been a wake-up call for him to not be the best at something and not have something come so easily as all else usually does.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That level of gifted needs to not be attending regular school. Way too boring for him. Most privates would be inappropriate too.
OP here,
He's in private but not one of the top privates, or one that people talk about as being particularly good for gifted kids. He followed an older sibling, because two different drop offs and pick ups seemed like it would be a pain.
He likes school, and never says "I was bored" about school, but he comes home from school with lots of pictures he's drawn and no homework and tells me "Oh we had free time in X class if we finished our work, so I did my homework there".
OP if it does turn out that he has ADHD or Executive functioning issues,, looks into Commonwealth Academy.. It was life-changing for my gifted/ADHD kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is his IQ profile pretty evenly distributed, or is he significantly higher in one area? Is his achievement level consistent with the IQ level? Does he seem socially well adjusted?
If his profile is uneven, then the easiest thing would be to keep him in a regular school, but supplement in the area of strength.
If he has a more even profile, I'd try to figure out why he doesn't seem to think he's bored. Is he just a very easygoing kid? Is he bored, but doesn't realize that school could be much more engaging and much faster paced? Is he happy to finish his work quickly, and then pursue one of his own interests?
If his achievement level is at best that of a normal smart kid, I'd look into additional evaluations. Very high IQ can mask LDs.
If he's struggling socially, keeping him in a normal school among normal kids will not help. He'll continue to feel like he doesn't fit in.
If he's sailing through school with no effort, then you need to make sure he's developing study skills and resilience from some activity. Having no study skills and expecting everything to be easy will eventually catch up with him and cause problems.
He doesn't have a lot of unevenness. His math and spatial scores are higher than his language and literacy scores, but not to the point that it points to an LD, and it's a little bit of a chicken and an egg thing because he seeks out more math and spatial kinds of things, than he does language and literacy kinds of things, so it seems logical that those skills would be more developed.
I think he goes to school each day with plans for things to occupy himself with during downtime, so he not only doesn't mind when the work is easy, he's kind of excited because it means he can do his own thing. He is very bad at being still and not being busy, but he's very good at figuring out interesting things to keep himself busy, and working those things into his schedule.
Socially he seems fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what did you do differently?
My middle schooler's IQ was just tested, and came back on the border between these two categories, according to the Hoagie's website. Apparently his score puts him in the top 0.03%. I guess I'm trying to figure out if this is information I need to do something with, or if I can just take these results and stick them in a drawer somewhere.
My kid has incredibly high IQ and ADHD. The tester’s suggestion was to indulge his interests/passions but not really do much differently.
Why was your child tested? My two were tested because of learning disabilities.
I'm not sure if you're asking me (OP) or the PP. I have a friend who is a neuropsychologist and she was looking for someone for a new staff member to practice on. I had mentioned that I was curious about how he'd do so she offered. I didn't come in with concerns, and they didn't find anything problematic. Just lots of high scores.
I knew it would be higher than average going in. That's why I was curious. He's good at school. He's a very busy kid who is always doing something. But I had heard that profoundly gifted kids always struggle, and they need radically different things than their same age peers, and they are so much harder to parent than "typical" kids and since none of those things seem to apply to him, I sort of assumed he'd come in at the bottom of the gifted range.
But now, I'm worried that maybe he does need something different and I'm doing him a disservice?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is his IQ profile pretty evenly distributed, or is he significantly higher in one area? Is his achievement level consistent with the IQ level? Does he seem socially well adjusted?
If his profile is uneven, then the easiest thing would be to keep him in a regular school, but supplement in the area of strength.
If he has a more even profile, I'd try to figure out why he doesn't seem to think he's bored. Is he just a very easygoing kid? Is he bored, but doesn't realize that school could be much more engaging and much faster paced? Is he happy to finish his work quickly, and then pursue one of his own interests?
If his achievement level is at best that of a normal smart kid, I'd look into additional evaluations. Very high IQ can mask LDs.
If he's struggling socially, keeping him in a normal school among normal kids will not help. He'll continue to feel like he doesn't fit in.
If he's sailing through school with no effort, then you need to make sure he's developing study skills and resilience from some activity. Having no study skills and expecting everything to be easy will eventually catch up with him and cause problems.
He doesn't have a lot of unevenness. His math and spatial scores are higher than his language and literacy scores, but not to the point that it points to an LD, and it's a little bit of a chicken and an egg thing because he seeks out more math and spatial kinds of things, than he does language and literacy kinds of things, so it seems logical that those skills would be more developed.
I think he goes to school each day with plans for things to occupy himself with during downtime, so he not only doesn't mind when the work is easy, he's kind of excited because it means he can do his own thing. He is very bad at being still and not being busy, but he's very good at figuring out interesting things to keep himself busy, and working those things into his schedule.
Socially he seems fine.
One of my kids teachers told me that the brightest kids are never bored. They are able to come up with their own version of the day. My kid used to write up her own spelling words...just words she wanted to know how to spell. She would add details to word problems to make them harder. It actually became a whole class challenge to write their own word problems...which the teacher occaissionally used! Never tested my kid so I have no idea where she falls.
Nice idea, but this also sound like a teacher who was willing to allow flexibility in the classroom. In some more rigid settings, yes, the brightest kids might be bored.
Anonymous wrote:Sorry, I posted too quickly. If your child qualifies, this program is invaluable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what did you do differently?
My middle schooler's IQ was just tested, and came back on the border between these two categories, according to the Hoagie's website. Apparently his score puts him in the top 0.03%. I guess I'm trying to figure out if this is information I need to do something with, or if I can just take these results and stick them in a drawer somewhere.
My kid has incredibly high IQ and ADHD. The tester’s suggestion was to indulge his interests/passions but not really do much differently.
Why was your child tested? My two were tested because of learning disabilities.
I'm not sure if you're asking me (OP) or the PP. I have a friend who is a neuropsychologist and she was looking for someone for a new staff member to practice on. I had mentioned that I was curious about how he'd do so she offered. I didn't come in with concerns, and they didn't find anything problematic. Just lots of high scores.
I knew it would be higher than average going in. That's why I was curious. He's good at school. He's a very busy kid who is always doing something. But I had heard that profoundly gifted kids always struggle, and they need radically different things than their same age peers, and they are so much harder to parent than "typical" kids and since none of those things seem to apply to him, I sort of assumed he'd come in at the bottom of the gifted range.
But now, I'm worried that maybe he does need something different and I'm doing him a disservice?
You need to get an actual IQ test from a reliable experienced provider. This is too big a deal to be based on a practice exam by a new staffer. Then, if results track, reread this thread.
DP. Why is getting a more precise IQ number a big deal? Getting an IQ test done is only important if you need it to access gifted services or need it for a neuropsych exam for LDs. OP doesn't think her kid shows any signs of LDs or underachievement. The IQ result is mostly a wake up call to OP that her son might not be sufficiently challenged or might develop social issues from being different from peers. Now that OP is aware of these issues, there's nothing important to be learned from a "more accurate" IQ test. Kids do not need to be quantified in that way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is his IQ profile pretty evenly distributed, or is he significantly higher in one area? Is his achievement level consistent with the IQ level? Does he seem socially well adjusted?
If his profile is uneven, then the easiest thing would be to keep him in a regular school, but supplement in the area of strength.
If he has a more even profile, I'd try to figure out why he doesn't seem to think he's bored. Is he just a very easygoing kid? Is he bored, but doesn't realize that school could be much more engaging and much faster paced? Is he happy to finish his work quickly, and then pursue one of his own interests?
If his achievement level is at best that of a normal smart kid, I'd look into additional evaluations. Very high IQ can mask LDs.
If he's struggling socially, keeping him in a normal school among normal kids will not help. He'll continue to feel like he doesn't fit in.
If he's sailing through school with no effort, then you need to make sure he's developing study skills and resilience from some activity. Having no study skills and expecting everything to be easy will eventually catch up with him and cause problems.
He doesn't have a lot of unevenness. His math and spatial scores are higher than his language and literacy scores, but not to the point that it points to an LD, and it's a little bit of a chicken and an egg thing because he seeks out more math and spatial kinds of things, than he does language and literacy kinds of things, so it seems logical that those skills would be more developed.
I think he goes to school each day with plans for things to occupy himself with during downtime, so he not only doesn't mind when the work is easy, he's kind of excited because it means he can do his own thing. He is very bad at being still and not being busy, but he's very good at figuring out interesting things to keep himself busy, and working those things into his schedule.
Socially he seems fine.
One of my kids teachers told me that the brightest kids are never bored. They are able to come up with their own version of the day. My kid used to write up her own spelling words...just words she wanted to know how to spell. She would add details to word problems to make them harder. It actually became a whole class challenge to write their own word problems...which the teacher occaissionally used! Never tested my kid so I have no idea where she falls.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what did you do differently?
My middle schooler's IQ was just tested, and came back on the border between these two categories, according to the Hoagie's website. Apparently his score puts him in the top 0.03%. I guess I'm trying to figure out if this is information I need to do something with, or if I can just take these results and stick them in a drawer somewhere.
My kid has incredibly high IQ and ADHD. The tester’s suggestion was to indulge his interests/passions but not really do much differently.
Why was your child tested? My two were tested because of learning disabilities.
I'm not sure if you're asking me (OP) or the PP. I have a friend who is a neuropsychologist and she was looking for someone for a new staff member to practice on. I had mentioned that I was curious about how he'd do so she offered. I didn't come in with concerns, and they didn't find anything problematic. Just lots of high scores.
I knew it would be higher than average going in. That's why I was curious. He's good at school. He's a very busy kid who is always doing something. But I had heard that profoundly gifted kids always struggle, and they need radically different things than their same age peers, and they are so much harder to parent than "typical" kids and since none of those things seem to apply to him, I sort of assumed he'd come in at the bottom of the gifted range.
But now, I'm worried that maybe he does need something different and I'm doing him a disservice?
You need to get an actual IQ test from a reliable experienced provider. This is too big a deal to be based on a practice exam by a new staffer. Then, if results track, reread this thread.