Anonymous wrote:I know LTRs of course happen in college, but even the LTRs I knew about in college for the most part had some kind of expiration date or risk of one as people went their separate ways for jobs. Other than that, my experience dating from age 20-25 was that you just don't bring up the idea of being marriage-minded or commitment-minded, or else you come off as desperate. You were supposed to be "chill" with whatever happened and smile and hope for the best. This was my era, about 10 years ago.
If you married or found the partner you were to marry when you were in your early 20s, how did it go? What would be your advice to people who do want to settle down relatively early, but not scare men away by sounding too desperate for commitment? And how do you navigate the risks that come with transience of that stage of life? And let's say you're not religious and into meeting people at church socials and the like. Did you meet in college, at a job or internship? Did you stay close to where you grew up, or choose to stay in the city where you went to school? It seems like most people in their 20s aren't sure where they want to be within the next 5 years, let alone who they want to be with.
Anonymous wrote:I have a 39 yr old friend who is unmarried. He is charming, handsome, makes a lot of money, generous and a man who is family oriented. No red flags.
However, his optics are not that great. He lives in an expensive condo in downtown, drives a super expensive car, has a pitbull, has a social media page that is full of pics of his high end life (he expenses it) - travel in first class, eating in the finest restaurants, flying to another continent for sporting events, best booze, best resorts etc. I want to shake him and tell him to fix all of this. Buy a TH (if not SFH) in a good school district, get a golden retriever or a cat, get rid of the pitbull, take pictures with the kids of your married friends. But, he does not find anything wrong with what he is portraying. What he is attracting are the golddiggers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll answer this as a mom of a 24 y.o. man who is moving in with his girlfriend next month and basically views it as a trial run for marriage- you find a guy who is not afraid of commitment, who values marriage and who values you. You don’t get yourself into “situationships”, you let them know early on that you are dating to marry, and if you scare some off - excellent, these are the men you are trying to avoid anyway.
This is the opposite of commitment.
Why? He told me if things work out well, a proposal will be coming in a year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll answer this as a mom of a 24 y.o. man who is moving in with his girlfriend next month and basically views it as a trial run for marriage- you find a guy who is not afraid of commitment, who values marriage and who values you. You don’t get yourself into “situationships”, you let them know early on that you are dating to marry, and if you scare some off - excellent, these are the men you are trying to avoid anyway.
This is the opposite of commitment.
Yup. This is a FWB situation.
What??? No way. Moving in with your partner is not what friends with benefits do. FWB means you don’t identify as boyfriend/girlfriend and are free to date other people.
Getting free sex in your 20s benefits men more, not women. It is prime years for women to find a worthy spouse. She is wasting it by playing house with a man without the benefit of a ring. What trial run for marriage does this man need? He already knows her character and if there are dealbreakers like promiscuity or addiction. Which obviously there are not. What else does he need to know? Will he breakup with her if she is a lousy cook or a messy person or if she snores? SMH.
Good for the PP's son to arrange for a free hole for his pole, but, OMG, young women are sooooo fekking stupid!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll answer this as a mom of a 24 y.o. man who is moving in with his girlfriend next month and basically views it as a trial run for marriage- you find a guy who is not afraid of commitment, who values marriage and who values you. You don’t get yourself into “situationships”, you let them know early on that you are dating to marry, and if you scare some off - excellent, these are the men you are trying to avoid anyway.
This is the opposite of commitment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ll answer this as a mom of a 24 y.o. man who is moving in with his girlfriend next month and basically views it as a trial run for marriage- you find a guy who is not afraid of commitment, who values marriage and who values you. You don’t get yourself into “situationships”, you let them know early on that you are dating to marry, and if you scare some off - excellent, these are the men you are trying to avoid anyway.
This is the opposite of commitment.
Yup. This is a FWB situation.
What??? No way. Moving in with your partner is not what friends with benefits do. FWB means you don’t identify as boyfriend/girlfriend and are free to date other people.
24 y/o men don’t do trial runs for marriage. They found a girl to sleep and hangout with, agree to move in together, and then at some point a few years later she finally drags him over the finish line.
Yes, this is the opposite thing I wanted. I know some men just married however was around at the time they felt like they were ready to get married, and felt like they owed it to the woman who had been with them for many years. Sometimes it worked out but often they just didn't seem to like their wives that much. I never wanted to wonder if my husband really loved me deeply or if I just wore him down.
Don’t delude yourself. Either way it’s because you were in the right place at the right time.
You know what they say. Women want to get married when they meet the right guy. Men want to get married when it’s the right time.