Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think everyone is somewhat racist.
We had DEI training a few years ago and the (Black) leader said that everybody is racist, no matter your color. The issue is how you recognize it in yourself and mitigate it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP did you think your family is more racist than others because they are white? I'm sure your girlfriend's parents made similar comments about you, especially if you have an obviously WASP name.
Only whites can be racist.
By definition, BIPOC peoples are incapable of racism.
Who gets to make that definition?
those who are marginalized. This is absolutely correct. Only whites can be racist.
I am a liberal, but this is one of those areas, like gender, where the new lefty shibboleths are so ridiculous that they are literally unbelievable. It is self-evident that non-whites can be racist. The evidence is there for all to see. Stop this nonsense, you are embarrassing yourself.
+100. Right up there with LatinX, which a niche of academia is trying to foist on Latinos who don’t want it.
Another progressive
Sorry, not sorry. It is blatant transphobia to refuse to use the correct term, LatinX.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP did you think your family is more racist than others because they are white? I'm sure your girlfriend's parents made similar comments about you, especially if you have an obviously WASP name.
Only whites can be racist.
By definition, BIPOC peoples are incapable of racism.
Who gets to make that definition?
those who are marginalized. This is absolutely correct. Only whites can be racist.
I am a liberal, but this is one of those areas, like gender, where the new lefty shibboleths are so ridiculous that they are literally unbelievable. It is self-evident that non-whites can be racist. The evidence is there for all to see. Stop this nonsense, you are embarrassing yourself.
+100. Right up there with LatinX, which a niche of academia is trying to foist on Latinos who don’t want it.
Another progressive
The first/only person I heard explaining and advocating for the use of LatinX was a woman of Mexican descent. I agree it's a nonsolution, but there isn't a nonproblematic term for people from Mexico on south.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP did you think your family is more racist than others because they are white? I'm sure your girlfriend's parents made similar comments about you, especially if you have an obviously WASP name.
Only whites can be racist.
By definition, BIPOC peoples are incapable of racism.
Who gets to make that definition?
those who are marginalized. This is absolutely correct. Only whites can be racist.
I am a liberal, but this is one of those areas, like gender, where the new lefty shibboleths are so ridiculous that they are literally unbelievable. It is self-evident that non-whites can be racist. The evidence is there for all to see. Stop this nonsense, you are embarrassing yourself.
+100. Right up there with LatinX, which a niche of academia is trying to foist on Latinos who don’t want it.
Another progressive
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP did you think your family is more racist than others because they are white? I'm sure your girlfriend's parents made similar comments about you, especially if you have an obviously WASP name.
Only whites can be racist.
By definition, BIPOC peoples are incapable of racism.
Who gets to make that definition?
those who are marginalized. This is absolutely correct. Only whites can be racist.
I am a liberal, but this is one of those areas, like gender, where the new lefty shibboleths are so ridiculous that they are literally unbelievable. It is self-evident that non-whites can be racist. The evidence is there for all to see. Stop this nonsense, you are embarrassing yourself.
+100. Right up there with LatinX, which a niche of academia is trying to foist on Latinos who don’t want it.
Another progressive
Sorry, not sorry. It is blatant transphobia to refuse to use the correct term, LatinX.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP did you think your family is more racist than others because they are white? I'm sure your girlfriend's parents made similar comments about you, especially if you have an obviously WASP name.
Only whites can be racist.
By definition, BIPOC peoples are incapable of racism.
Who gets to make that definition?
those who are marginalized. This is absolutely correct. Only whites can be racist.
I am a liberal, but this is one of those areas, like gender, where the new lefty shibboleths are so ridiculous that they are literally unbelievable. It is self-evident that non-whites can be racist. The evidence is there for all to see. Stop this nonsense, you are embarrassing yourself.
+100. Right up there with LatinX, which a niche of academia is trying to foist on Latinos who don’t want it.
Another progressive
Sorry, not sorry. It is blatant transphobia to refuse to use the correct term, LatinX.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fwiw, many ethnicities are like that and it's fine when they do it. The only problem is when white people do it
My grandmother refused to attend a cousins wedding because we are all Jewish and our cousin was not marrying a Jew. It was awful as our grandmother did not quietly protest (as if she had anything to protest) but instead made her "horror" known ever since the couple became engaged. The groom is one of the kinder men in our extended family.
It happens in so many families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP did you think your family is more racist than others because they are white? I'm sure your girlfriend's parents made similar comments about you, especially if you have an obviously WASP name.
Only whites can be racist.
By definition, BIPOC peoples are incapable of racism.
Who gets to make that definition?
those who are marginalized. This is absolutely correct. Only whites can be racist.
I am a liberal, but this is one of those areas, like gender, where the new lefty shibboleths are so ridiculous that they are literally unbelievable. It is self-evident that non-whites can be racist. The evidence is there for all to see. Stop this nonsense, you are embarrassing yourself.
+100. Right up there with LatinX, which a niche of academia is trying to foist on Latinos who don’t want it.
Another progressive
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is nothing racist about white people commenting on the racist and problematic behavior of their own community. It’s being self-aware. If you have a problem with this, you should discover why. As for the other posts pointing out issues with other communities, start your own thread. This thread deals with WASPs.
For those who don’t think WASPs are racist, please explain to me why country clubs blocked memberships of minorities or different religions. Maybe the new breed of Episcopalians are more enlightened but the older generation were low key racists.
This point about older generations is largely correct. But not even universally. Our fancy local country club blocked Jews like our family doctor, so my parents joined the YMCA outdoor pool instead. They were Episcopalian, as were a number of the other Y members.
the price difference probably didn't hurt, either
Nope. Dad was a senior exec at a large national corporation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is nothing racist about white people commenting on the racist and problematic behavior of their own community. It’s being self-aware. If you have a problem with this, you should discover why. As for the other posts pointing out issues with other communities, start your own thread. This thread deals with WASPs.
For those who don’t think WASPs are racist, please explain to me why country clubs blocked memberships of minorities or different religions. Maybe the new breed of Episcopalians are more enlightened but the older generation were low key racists.
This point about older generations is largely correct. But not even universally. Our fancy local country club blocked Jews like our family doctor, so my parents joined the YMCA outdoor pool instead. They were Episcopalian, as were a number of the other Y members.
the price difference probably didn't hurt, either
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP did you think your family is more racist than others because they are white? I'm sure your girlfriend's parents made similar comments about you, especially if you have an obviously WASP name.
Only whites can be racist.
By definition, BIPOC peoples are incapable of racism.
Who gets to make that definition?
those who are marginalized. This is absolutely correct. Only whites can be racist.
I am a liberal, but this is one of those areas, like gender, where the new lefty shibboleths are so ridiculous that they are literally unbelievable. It is self-evident that non-whites can be racist. The evidence is there for all to see. Stop this nonsense, you are embarrassing yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[google]Anonymous wrote:True WASPs aren't racist.
Laughable! WASP culture is absolutely racist.
No. True WASP culture is the type of Episcopalianism where you are very worried about racism and social justice but have no minority friends. It's about being overly obsequious to your housekeeper because she's "like family". It's about believing you couldn't possibly be racist because racism is a character flaw and WASPs don't have character flaws, they are the moral paradigms that all other Americans should strive to be.
LOL, this describes many Episcopalians I know.
Oh boy is this spot on!
Christians in general are racists.
You've obviously never lived in Muslim countries or East Asia. Or even in various African countries where people strongly discriminate against tribal origins and faith.
This conversation is about America.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[google]Anonymous wrote:True WASPs aren't racist.
Laughable! WASP culture is absolutely racist.
No. True WASP culture is the type of Episcopalianism where you are very worried about racism and social justice but have no minority friends. It's about being overly obsequious to your housekeeper because she's "like family". It's about believing you couldn't possibly be racist because racism is a character flaw and WASPs don't have character flaws, they are the moral paradigms that all other Americans should strive to be.
LOL, this describes many Episcopalians I know.
Oh boy is this spot on!
Christians in general are racists.
You've obviously never lived in Muslim countries or East Asia. Or even in various African countries where people strongly discriminate against tribal origins and faith.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP did you think your family is more racist than others because they are white? I'm sure your girlfriend's parents made similar comments about you, especially if you have an obviously WASP name.
Only whites can be racist.
By definition, BIPOC peoples are incapable of racism.
Who gets to make that definition?
those who are marginalized. This is absolutely correct. Only whites can be racist.
I am a liberal, but this is one of those areas, like gender, where the new lefty shibboleths are so ridiculous that they are literally unbelievable. It is self-evident that non-whites can be racist. The evidence is there for all to see. Stop this nonsense, you are embarrassing yourself.
You need to report to the nearest reeducation center.