Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand not having confidence in the (Amidon) feeder. But there is right now another thread with enrollment data showing the 6th grade this year at Jefferson actually has 27 students from VN, 22 from Amidon, and 16 from Tyler.
VN, Amidon, and Tyler aren't traditionally considered "good" schools, just not bad, i.e., the kind of school where higher SES parents are comfortable sending their kids from PK3 through 1st or 2nd or so, and then peel off. The debate over Jefferson is usually over whether there is a critical mass of Brent kids willing to go there. That said, there are certainly worse options than Jefferson for middle school.
As a current VN parent (older child is now at Jefferson after going all the way through VN) I would disagree with you. Many of the friends my kid has made are from a variety of backgrounds (culturally, socio-economically, etc). VN and JA have very involved PTOs which create supportive school environments. Both my kids are happy, as are their friends. Both are doing academically advanced work in both of the schools. JA employs a full time 9th grade math teacher due to the number of advanced math students.
Thanks for sharing your experience! People here like to jump to generalized conclusions about what schools can/cannot offer, many of whom are basing it on test scores or second hand info without ever being enrolled in the school. I appreciate when parents at the schools share their lived experience. I have heard great things about Jefferson - and while we are IB for Eliot and will be sending our child there in the fall, if we were in bounds for Jefferson I would be sending my son there.
+1. I’d love to hear more about what kind of academically advanced work PPs kids are doing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand not having confidence in the (Amidon) feeder. But there is right now another thread with enrollment data showing the 6th grade this year at Jefferson actually has 27 students from VN, 22 from Amidon, and 16 from Tyler.
VN, Amidon, and Tyler aren't traditionally considered "good" schools, just not bad, i.e., the kind of school where higher SES parents are comfortable sending their kids from PK3 through 1st or 2nd or so, and then peel off. The debate over Jefferson is usually over whether there is a critical mass of Brent kids willing to go there. That said, there are certainly worse options than Jefferson for middle school.
As a current VN parent (older child is now at Jefferson after going all the way through VN) I would disagree with you. Many of the friends my kid has made are from a variety of backgrounds (culturally, socio-economically, etc). VN and JA have very involved PTOs which create supportive school environments. Both my kids are happy, as are their friends. Both are doing academically advanced work in both of the schools. JA employs a full time 9th grade math teacher due to the number of advanced math students.
Thanks for sharing your experience! People here like to jump to generalized conclusions about what schools can/cannot offer, many of whom are basing it on test scores or second hand info without ever being enrolled in the school. I appreciate when parents at the schools share their lived experience. I have heard great things about Jefferson - and while we are IB for Eliot and will be sending our child there in the fall, if we were in bounds for Jefferson I would be sending my son there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand not having confidence in the (Amidon) feeder. But there is right now another thread with enrollment data showing the 6th grade this year at Jefferson actually has 27 students from VN, 22 from Amidon, and 16 from Tyler.
VN, Amidon, and Tyler aren't traditionally considered "good" schools, just not bad, i.e., the kind of school where higher SES parents are comfortable sending their kids from PK3 through 1st or 2nd or so, and then peel off. The debate over Jefferson is usually over whether there is a critical mass of Brent kids willing to go there. That said, there are certainly worse options than Jefferson for middle school.
As a current VN parent (older child is now at Jefferson after going all the way through VN) I would disagree with you. Many of the friends my kid has made are from a variety of backgrounds (culturally, socio-economically, etc). VN and JA have very involved PTOs which create supportive school environments. Both my kids are happy, as are their friends. Both are doing academically advanced work in both of the schools. JA employs a full time 9th grade math teacher due to the number of advanced math students.
Anonymous wrote:Seaton folks - are your kids in older grades? Considering that area for a move.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand not having confidence in the (Amidon) feeder. But there is right now another thread with enrollment data showing the 6th grade this year at Jefferson actually has 27 students from VN, 22 from Amidon, and 16 from Tyler.
VN, Amidon, and Tyler aren't traditionally considered "good" schools, just not bad, i.e., the kind of school where higher SES parents are comfortable sending their kids from PK3 through 1st or 2nd or so, and then peel off. The debate over Jefferson is usually over whether there is a critical mass of Brent kids willing to go there. That said, there are certainly worse options than Jefferson for middle school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the record, the majority of kids who came to Jefferson from Brent last year are still there this year.
It’s also worth noting that USN&WR ranks Jefferson as the third-best DCPS standalone middle school (behind only Deal and Hardy).
https://www.usnews.com/education/k12/middle-schools/district-of-columbia
Anonymous wrote:In-depth overview of 5 charters:
https://www.the74million.org/article/langhorne-these-5-d-c-charter-schools-all-have-the-same-mission-but-couldnt-be-more-different/?utm_source=The%2074%20Million%20Newsletter&utm_campaign=bd59ab0161-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_05_13_08_52&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_077b986842-bd59ab0161-176305201&fbclid=IwAR322ihVIhQc9T6WS_veyEDAkhoQQFAdWVJSUVG41TQFK9DB3wdf6hJiBuQ
Anonymous wrote:VN, Amidon, and Tyler are all Title 1 but this is a thread about overlooked schools and I think it is inaccurate to say all of the UMC families who went their for PreK necessarily leave by 1st/2nd grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hyde Addison is decent. Actually, great for size and feeder. Garrison is under rated but believe most avoid because of their high Hispanic population.
This is sad re: Garrison. What's wrong with going to school with Hispanic children? Sheesh people. (I think it's obvious but just in case my sheesh is not directed at the poster quoted, or anyone who has else who has participated in this thread so far).
Nothing but people are weird in their thinking.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For the record, the majority of kids who came to Jefferson from Brent last year are still there this year.
All 5 of them?
Definitely more than that. And my point is that the majority of Brent families who gave Jefferson a try for 6th grade last year were happy enough to return for 7th this year.
Looking the bigger picture, the overall retention for Jefferson students from year to year is very good. And it’s clearly one of the more popular middle schools in DC, as demonstrated by the length of its waitlist.
I understand what you are trying to parse but...
The sample size is very, very small. This would be more meaningful with a larger sample size People who went to Jefferson are likely in one of two categories: true believers or people with no other viable options (read: bad lottery luck and no mobility. It stands to reason that those groups would remain. This is one time when relativity might be instructive. How does the YoY retention of Jefferson for that cohort differ from the SH and EH cohorts from other ES?