Anonymous wrote:Most pediatrician's offices will meet with a child separately once the child becomes a teenager. Do you think that is appropriate? Or will you try to sit in there as well?
Anonymous wrote:Most pediatrician's offices will meet with a child separately once the child becomes a teenager. Do you think that is appropriate? Or will you try to sit in there as well?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. I never intervene in the sessions. Ever.
But with how intense and competitive and results-oriented I've heard the DC area is, I'm surprised that parents don't sit in. I'd encourage you to do so.
So many parents seem to bemoan their children's lack of progress. This could be a reason why.
I have been an unapologetic advocate for my child and a savvy consumer.
It just seems *prudent* to sit in unless a child is uncomfortable with a parent in the room. My child is super comfortable with me and with my presence.
Thanks to all posters. It's been interesting.
Op you are a nut. I’m going to guess you, and your child’s diagnosis involves an anxiety component.
More importantly, when your child is an adult and needs intense therapy to unpack why they hate their mom, are you going to sit in on those sessions too?
Of course she is? She wants control, and worse, she doesn’t actually want her child to get better. She wants to play this important role for her entire life.
Can a therapist report a parent for inhibiting a child’s therapy?
Real question is if you don't want parents involved, what are YOU hiding?
Establishment of rapport is critical to making the child feel safe and comfortable working on a skill that is hard for them. Having you observe makes things awkward and your child doesn't do as well because the work feels like a performance for you. You are interfering with sessions by observing them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not weird, but I also don't mind parents sitting in at all.
However, many parents have no idea what an SLP is actually doing because they themselves are not SLPs. If your SLP is reading a book they are not "just reading a book". They could be working on grammar, story telling, articulation, fluency, answering questions, main idea, vocabulary, basic concepts etc.. some people are too quick to judge.
You sound very defensive. Actually, this is what SLP is supposed to communicate: assessment, goals, progress to goals. You should be safe to assume that parents of a 9 yo who needs ST already know something about ST. The reason she wants to sit in is to follow what they are doing and work on same concepts at home. How do you think people look for and evaluate providers? Walk around with a wad of cash waiting for whomever with an appointment available. It's a private service, people do research to understand what they are getting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. I never intervene in the sessions. Ever.
But with how intense and competitive and results-oriented I've heard the DC area is, I'm surprised that parents don't sit in. I'd encourage you to do so.
So many parents seem to bemoan their children's lack of progress. This could be a reason why.
I have been an unapologetic advocate for my child and a savvy consumer.
It just seems *prudent* to sit in unless a child is uncomfortable with a parent in the room. My child is super comfortable with me and with my presence.
Thanks to all posters. It's been interesting.
Op you are a nut. I’m going to guess you, and your child’s diagnosis involves an anxiety component.
More importantly, when your child is an adult and needs intense therapy to unpack why they hate their mom, are you going to sit in on those sessions too?
Of course she is? She wants control, and worse, she doesn’t actually want her child to get better. She wants to play this important role for her entire life.
Can a therapist report a parent for inhibiting a child’s therapy?
Real question is if you don't want parents involved, what are YOU hiding?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. I never intervene in the sessions. Ever.
But with how intense and competitive and results-oriented I've heard the DC area is, I'm surprised that parents don't sit in. I'd encourage you to do so.
So many parents seem to bemoan their children's lack of progress. This could be a reason why.
I have been an unapologetic advocate for my child and a savvy consumer.
It just seems *prudent* to sit in unless a child is uncomfortable with a parent in the room. My child is super comfortable with me and with my presence.
Thanks to all posters. It's been interesting.
Op you are a nut. I’m going to guess you, and your child’s diagnosis involves an anxiety component.
More importantly, when your child is an adult and needs intense therapy to unpack why they hate their mom, are you going to sit in on those sessions too?
Of course she is? She wants control, and worse, she doesn’t actually want her child to get better. She wants to play this important role for her entire life.
Can a therapist report a parent for inhibiting a child’s therapy?
Anonymous wrote:Not weird, but I also don't mind parents sitting in at all.
However, many parents have no idea what an SLP is actually doing because they themselves are not SLPs. If your SLP is reading a book they are not "just reading a book". They could be working on grammar, story telling, articulation, fluency, answering questions, main idea, vocabulary, basic concepts etc.. some people are too quick to judge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. I never intervene in the sessions. Ever.
But with how intense and competitive and results-oriented I've heard the DC area is, I'm surprised that parents don't sit in. I'd encourage you to do so.
So many parents seem to bemoan their children's lack of progress. This could be a reason why.
I have been an unapologetic advocate for my child and a savvy consumer.
It just seems *prudent* to sit in unless a child is uncomfortable with a parent in the room. My child is super comfortable with me and with my presence.
Thanks to all posters. It's been interesting.
Op you are a nut. I’m going to guess you, and your child’s diagnosis involves an anxiety component.
More importantly, when your child is an adult and needs intense therapy to unpack why they hate their mom, are you going to sit in on those sessions too?
Anonymous wrote:OP here. I never intervene in the sessions. Ever.
But with how intense and competitive and results-oriented I've heard the DC area is, I'm surprised that parents don't sit in. I'd encourage you to do so.
So many parents seem to bemoan their children's lack of progress. This could be a reason why.
I have been an unapologetic advocate for my child and a savvy consumer.
It just seems *prudent* to sit in unless a child is uncomfortable with a parent in the room. My child is super comfortable with me and with my presence.
Thanks to all posters. It's been interesting.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. I never intervene in the sessions. Ever.
But with how intense and competitive and results-oriented I've heard the DC area is, I'm surprised that parents don't sit in. I'd encourage you to do so.
So many parents seem to bemoan their children's lack of progress. This could be a reason why.
I have been an unapologetic advocate for my child and a savvy consumer.
It just seems *prudent* to sit in unless a child is uncomfortable with a parent in the room. My child is super comfortable with me and with my presence.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. I never intervene in the sessions. Ever.
But with how intense and competitive and results-oriented I've heard the DC area is, I'm surprised that parents don't sit in. I'd encourage you to do so.
So many parents seem to bemoan their children's lack of progress. This could be a reason why.
I have been an unapologetic advocate for my child and a savvy consumer.
It just seems *prudent* to sit in unless a child is uncomfortable with a parent in the room. My child is super comfortable with me and with my presence.
Thanks to all posters. It's been interesting.