Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it appropriate for an educator to tell an elementary school child to walk at the end of the line for the final quarter of school because they are sick of telling them to stop talking in line?
There's is nothing wrong with this per se. The only slight problem is that it is too absolute and allows no chance for redemption/improvement... they are just stuck at the end of the line for the rest of the year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like punishments like this, especially for younger elementary kids. It's meant to break them. I understand why a kid who always talks when they are told not to is a problem for a teacher, but in an ideal world, we wouldn't be looking for ways to silence exuberant and social children.
But then I hate traditional school models and I love talkative, silly kids.
Agree with the PP who said elementary school sucks. I had forgotten how much it sucks, until I had a kid in one. It's the pits! Wish I could afford to send my kid to a school where they had class outside all the time and running and talking were encouraged.
You’re ridiculous. There are 1000 things wrong with schooling in general, but learning that there is a time and place for volume is something that any child must (should) do. School is certainly the appropriate place to teach it, and you should be reinforcing that at home.
Do you think it’s okay to encourage running and screeching in hotel rooms? Do you like your children to use loud and exuberant voices in the hallway when their elderly grandparent is napping in an adjacent room? Do you smile indulgently while your child’s talking wakes a sleeping baby? Or when your child is being “exuberant” in the public library while people are trying to read? If so, YOU are the problem.
There is a time and place for everything. Kids can be louder in the cafeteria and at recess and in PE and even in the classroom. But teachers are trying to teach and kids are trying to learn. There is no talking in the hallways. This was the rule at the dawn of time when I was in elementary school, too. Be a damn grown up and raise your kid to have some consideration for others.
At my kid's school they aren't allowed to talk in the cafeteria at lunchtime and they can't talk to each other during PE or very much in the classroom unless it's to discuss a designated assignment. The only time kids are allowed to talk freely to each other is during recess. So it doesn't surprise me that kids are constantly trying to chat in the hallways or during class -- they get very little time to socialize.
Sometimes the problem is the kid won't follow the rules. Sometimes the problem is the rules.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it appropriate for an educator to tell an elementary school child to walk at the end of the line for the final quarter of school because they are sick of telling them to stop talking in line?
How do you respond when your child ignores your requests?
Haha most of these “constant irritation” behaviors that exist are also seen at home with the kids also disrespecting their parents.
Sometimes I think people here have completely forgotten what school is like. They actually think it’s OK for their kid to be constantly disobeying.
I'm a parent of a talker and I don't accept my kid constantly disobeying, but I do recognize that she often isn't "disobeying" so much as she's struggling with a rule. I could absolutely see this happening to her. Personally, I would try to reframe it as "the teacher is trying to help you remember not to talk in the hallways because sometimes it's hard to remember -- if you are behind everyone, it will be easier to remember because there will be fewer kids around you to talk to." So not even as a punishment, but as a way to facilitate her following the rule.
I think if the teacher framed it as a punishment, leading the kid to feel shamed by it, that was a mistake on the teacher's part. Kids are super sensitive to shame and punishment and it often distracts from the lesson you want to teach. It really works best if you can find a way to be on the same side as the kid ("how do we solve this problem together") and then invite them to join you in the solution, instead of administering a punishment. It empowers kids to *choose* to behave, and to see you as an ally in that happening.
Parenting/teaching is much easier if you don't view yourself as in opposition to the child all the time. I get annoyed with teachers who still haven't figured this out. Sure, it takes more work up front to take the approach I just outlined, but you get better results in the long run. Your kids need to see you as an ally and resource, not a dictator due for an uprising.
Anonymous wrote:I don't like punishments like this, especially for younger elementary kids. It's meant to break them. I understand why a kid who always talks when they are told not to is a problem for a teacher, but in an ideal world, we wouldn't be looking for ways to silence exuberant and social children.
But then I hate traditional school models and I love talkative, silly kids.
Agree with the PP who said elementary school sucks. I had forgotten how much it sucks, until I had a kid in one. It's the pits! Wish I could afford to send my kid to a school where they had class outside all the time and running and talking were encouraged.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it appropriate for an educator to tell an elementary school child to walk at the end of the line for the final quarter of school because they are sick of telling them to stop talking in line?
There's is nothing wrong with this per se. The only slight problem is that it is too absolute and allows no chance for redemption/improvement... they are just stuck at the end of the line for the rest of the year.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Had taken that approach, but it seems like a rather severe immutable punishment for...talking in the hallways. If a child punches someone, which most would agree is a far more serious behavioral matter, are they given 3 months of daily punishment?
DD says they feel some kids are now treating them differently due to this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like punishments like this, especially for younger elementary kids. It's meant to break them. I understand why a kid who always talks when they are told not to is a problem for a teacher, but in an ideal world, we wouldn't be looking for ways to silence exuberant and social children.
But then I hate traditional school models and I love talkative, silly kids.
Agree with the PP who said elementary school sucks. I had forgotten how much it sucks, until I had a kid in one. It's the pits! Wish I could afford to send my kid to a school where they had class outside all the time and running and talking were encouraged.
You’re ridiculous. There are 1000 things wrong with schooling in general, but learning that there is a time and place for volume is something that any child must (should) do. School is certainly the appropriate place to teach it, and you should be reinforcing that at home.
Do you think it’s okay to encourage running and screeching in hotel rooms? Do you like your children to use loud and exuberant voices in the hallway when their elderly grandparent is napping in an adjacent room? Do you smile indulgently while your child’s talking wakes a sleeping baby? Or when your child is being “exuberant” in the public library while people are trying to read? If so, YOU are the problem.
There is a time and place for everything. Kids can be louder in the cafeteria and at recess and in PE and even in the classroom. But teachers are trying to teach and kids are trying to learn. There is no talking in the hallways. This was the rule at the dawn of time when I was in elementary school, too. Be a damn grown up and raise your kid to have some consideration for others.
Anonymous wrote:I don't like punishments like this, especially for younger elementary kids. It's meant to break them. I understand why a kid who always talks when they are told not to is a problem for a teacher, but in an ideal world, we wouldn't be looking for ways to silence exuberant and social children.
But then I hate traditional school models and I love talkative, silly kids.
Agree with the PP who said elementary school sucks. I had forgotten how much it sucks, until I had a kid in one. It's the pits! Wish I could afford to send my kid to a school where they had class outside all the time and running and talking were encouraged.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it appropriate for an educator to tell an elementary school child to walk at the end of the line for the final quarter of school because they are sick of telling them to stop talking in line?
Theirs is nothing wrong with this per se. The only slight problem is that it is too absolute and allows no chance for redemption/improvement... they are just stuck at the end of the line for the rest of the year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is it appropriate for an educator to tell an elementary school child to walk at the end of the line for the final quarter of school because they are sick of telling them to stop talking in line?
I do not like that the teacher went out of her way to embarrass a child with a punishment that she deemed humiliating
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't like punishments like this, especially for younger elementary kids. It's meant to break them. I understand why a kid who always talks when they are told not to is a problem for a teacher, but in an ideal world, we wouldn't be looking for ways to silence exuberant and social children.
But then I hate traditional school models and I love talkative, silly kids.
Agree with the PP who said elementary school sucks. I had forgotten how much it sucks, until I had a kid in one. It's the pits! Wish I could afford to send my kid to a school where they had class outside all the time and running and talking were encouraged.
There is no school like that. Just homeschool