Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Dan Levy-he was EVERYWHERE
He was promoting "Schitt's Creek" so yeah, he was everywhere, but he hasn't vanished since it ended in 2020. He was already a writer/producer/presenter before he ever made "Schitts's Creek." He has three new shows he is executive producing right now. And he's not the kind of producer who's an actor getting a producer credit for vanity and extra money; he actually...produces.
Some folks on this thread seem to think that someone is on the rocks if they aren't constantly in front of the camera acting. And a lot of PPs here are tossing out names without even thinking to spend a nanosecond looking these people up. It's why the good Lord gave us the gift that is IMDB.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Richard Armitage after North and South. He seems to just make bad Netflix films occasionally.
Great actor. He was in the hobbit, but agree that he’s had terrible roles.
He's definitely the leading man type, but there's some evidence he's gay and he won't cop to it or not, so possibly movies don't know what to do with him.
He's just come out but it was a not-at-all-well-hidden-secret for a long time. However, if Tom Cruise can play straight characters, so can he.
Damn right!
Armitage, and I'm sure other actors around his age and even a bit younger, were likely well aware that being openly gay (apparently he uses queer, I have to note that) would damage your career until quite recently. The big example was Rupert Everett, who absolutely was Next Big Thing-bound but also came out as gay very early--1989--and has said since that it definitely hurt his acting prospects: "In 2009, Everett told British newspaper The Observer that he wished he had never revealed his sexuality, as he feels that it hurt his career and advised younger actors against such candour." I've read other interviews where he said much the same. He worked, for sure, but has said more than once that roles were severely limited and he knew it was due to his being openly gay. It's been over 30 years since he came out but I'd wager that other actors working in the 90s-2000s-2010s, like Armitage, looked at his example and kept private as much as they dared. Especially ones like Armitage who played a lot of straight leading-man types.
I thought that the entertainment industry of all places would be more accepting of gay people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Richard Armitage after North and South. He seems to just make bad Netflix films occasionally.
Great actor. He was in the hobbit, but agree that he’s had terrible roles.
He's definitely the leading man type, but there's some evidence he's gay and he won't cop to it or not, so possibly movies don't know what to do with him.
He's just come out but it was a not-at-all-well-hidden-secret for a long time. However, if Tom Cruise can play straight characters, so can he.
Damn right!
Armitage, and I'm sure other actors around his age and even a bit younger, were likely well aware that being openly gay (apparently he uses queer, I have to note that) would damage your career until quite recently. The big example was Rupert Everett, who absolutely was Next Big Thing-bound but also came out as gay very early--1989--and has said since that it definitely hurt his acting prospects: "In 2009, Everett told British newspaper The Observer that he wished he had never revealed his sexuality, as he feels that it hurt his career and advised younger actors against such candour." I've read other interviews where he said much the same. He worked, for sure, but has said more than once that roles were severely limited and he knew it was due to his being openly gay. It's been over 30 years since he came out but I'd wager that other actors working in the 90s-2000s-2010s, like Armitage, looked at his example and kept private as much as they dared. Especially ones like Armitage who played a lot of straight leading-man types.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Richard Armitage after North and South. He seems to just make bad Netflix films occasionally.
Great actor. He was in the hobbit, but agree that he’s had terrible roles.
He's definitely the leading man type, but there's some evidence he's gay and he won't cop to it or not, so possibly movies don't know what to do with him.
He's just come out but it was a not-at-all-well-hidden-secret for a long time. However, if Tom Cruise can play straight characters, so can he.
Anonymous wrote:Dan Levy-he was EVERYWHERE
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one mentioned Jennifer Grey?
Why would they?
Anonymous wrote:No one mentioned Jennifer Grey?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Mini Driver She is still out there working. But I thought she would have had a bigger career.
She's a character actor who never fit the pretty ingenue mold. She's done pretty well actually, has worked steadily just not in big flashy roles. Not sure she even was after those though.
+1, I found it odd that someone named Minnie Driver. Like you say, I don't think she was ever tapped by Hollywood publicity as a next big thing/Hollywood movie leading actress. She's always been more of a character actor despite appearing in the usual rom-coms earlier in her career. She's in a lot of UK and other international productions and has worked very steadily, has several movies and series about to be released. Yeah, I looked her up on IMDB because of this thread. Funny how the yardstick is "next big thing"...what, in romcoms and Hollywood movies? Who cares? Just working steadily is "making it" for most actors.
Anonymous wrote:Edward Furlong