Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a moderate Republican, I agree with you OP.
How do you define being a 'moderate republican"?
Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.
Anonymous wrote:As a moderate Republican, I agree with you OP.
Anonymous wrote:Joe Biden pretty much fits your description OP. It's one reason he won.
Anonymous wrote:What does socially conservative mean if not anti-abortion?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.
Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.
Yes, I have no issue with that. I stand by it-- Bill Clinton is ideal.
Whatever you want to label yourself is fine. You vote for a democrat on election day so good. Call yourself a republican or whatever you want as long as you vote pro choice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are you against immigration? This country was founded on immigration. This country thrives on immigration. Immigrants not only get the job done, they revitalize the economy. That is a fact.
This country was not "founded" on immigration. Where do you get that from?
Where do you think the Founders came from, exactly?
Nearly all of them were born in America. So?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.
Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.
Yes, I have no issue with that. I stand by it-- Bill Clinton is ideal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are you against immigration? This country was founded on immigration. This country thrives on immigration. Immigrants not only get the job done, they revitalize the economy. That is a fact.
Nope. This country was founded on invasion and occupation.
The current politics is to invade other countries, then let their residents in as refugees who harbor an animus towards this country.
Really? State the policy name and where we can go read it. Thanks. Also which country is sending us refugees who harbor animus toward us? If you're talking about Iraq and Afghanistan, then all I can say is you don't know many Iraqis and Afghans.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.
Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nope.
Your options are pro-life/Christian Nationalism, or else democrats.
Nope. The options are fascist, speech-policing imbeciles, or else Republicans.
DP
So no choice at all, is what you are saying.
Democrats certainly don't offer a "choice" when it comes to speaking and opinions. There is only your way, or the highway. I'll take the highway, thanks.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.
Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.
DP. That's why I would consider Bill Clinton an ideal candidate. I'm also a Republican and I'm pro-choice, as well as all the other things PP listed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.
Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are you against immigration? This country was founded on immigration. This country thrives on immigration. Immigrants not only get the job done, they revitalize the economy. That is a fact.
Show me a thriving, healthy, ethnically diverse community.