Anonymous wrote:Just another way that people will be vulnerable to manipulation once no one can read historic documents…
This is a really, really stupid take. You know that, right? Just how many significant historical documents do you think there are that: a) are significant bulwarks against manipulation; b) have not been converted to type; and c) are in a form of English that is comprehensible to an American that can't or won't learn cursive?
So, what is your motive in making such an assertion? You have an emotional attachment to cursive that can't be driven by your purported "vulnerable to manipulation" concern but you advanced that concern-trolling "vulnerable to manipulation" nonsense for ... what reason?