Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is what I heard so far:
8 Harvard
6 Yale
9 Princeton
11 MIT
5 Stanford
8 Columbia
10 Upenn
18 Michigan
16 CMU
14 Chicago
15 Cornell
This if correct is similar to last year…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm a parent of TJ senior and here is number I get so far:
3 Harvard
1 or 2 Yale
2 Princeton
4 or 5 MIT (all from REA)
1 S (maybe)
1 Columbia
2 Upenn
The real number maybe higher than this but definitely not much. Worst year in decade.
Yikes! That’s a lot of less acceptances compared to last year. I know of a couple kids, once maybe middle of the pack at TJ but the other I would put in the top 10-15% who got less than desirable results.
Anonymous wrote:
This is what I heard so far:
8 Harvard
6 Yale
9 Princeton
11 MIT
5 Stanford
8 Columbia
10 Upenn
18 Michigan
16 CMU
14 Chicago
15 Cornell
Anonymous wrote:I'm a parent of TJ senior and here is number I get so far:
3 Harvard
1 or 2 Yale
2 Princeton
4 or 5 MIT (all from REA)
1 S (maybe)
1 Columbia
2 Upenn
The real number maybe higher than this but definitely not much. Worst year in decade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do top colleges know that it is harder to get As at TJ vs base high school? Or do they view a 4.6 at TJ the same as a 4.6 at Oakton, Chantilly, Madison etc
Any AO worth their salt at an elite school is familiar with TJ. It is after all the #1 HS in the US and with its commitment to diversity and equity is also aligned with the priorities of top universities.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a parent of TJ senior and here is number I get so far:
3 Harvard
1 or 2 Yale
2 Princeton
4 or 5 MIT (all from REA)
1 S (maybe)
1 Columbia
2 Upenn
The real number maybe higher than this but definitely not much. Worst year in decade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i read this on another forum.
I know things are crazy this admissions season, country-wide.
How are things at TJ?
It's really gone downhill, but hopefully the changes to admission will help address these failings in years to come.
You must be crying because of all the envy and disdain. Stop crying and whining and try to do better.
Not sure what you're going on about but I couldn't be happier with TJ's new direction. Things should start looking up once the kids who got in because of test buying graduate.
No, things will get better due to the evisceration of affirmative action coming to the top colleges/universities near you in Summer blockbuster hit.
Yup, ending the Asian discrimination in college admissions will definitely increase the top 20 acceptances from about 80 to 160.
Hate to break it to you, but colleges are going to admit who they want to admit and they'll come up with a different way to do it. Especially private universities. And FCPS is going to find a way to do the same thing with TJ. The courts won't save you - you need to actually have positions that are popular enough to win elections.
The bottom line is that colleges and universities are businesses, and it's not good business for them in today's environment to have a predominance of any race, ethnicity, or other demographic in their student body.
Other forward-thinking businesses have recognized that there are multiple ways to achieve and demonstrate merit - should it come as a surprise that elite universities have followed in their footsteps?
We shall overcome this despicable racial discrimination against Asians someday.
People like you won’t be happy until TJ and all of the Ivies and MIT and Caltech are 100% Asian.
Despite their Asian segregation fantasies, it will never happen. The UC system has been race-blind for decades and provides a realistic glimpse of what we can expect.
But keep in mind California has a much higher percentage of Asians than most of the remainder of the US.
The UC system is not race-blind.
The UC system is required by law (namely Prop 209) to engage in race-blind hiring and admissions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do top colleges know that it is harder to get As at TJ vs base high school? Or do they view a 4.6 at TJ the same as a 4.6 at Oakton, Chantilly, Madison etc
AOs typically compare kids to other kids in the same school first. So a 4.6 GPA kid from TJ would be weighed against a 4.4 kid from TJ, and GPA would be one metric of comparison, along with other activities and "institutional priorities". Along with GPA they would look at class rank, or if the school doesn't rank, use bands - top 1%, top 5%, top 10% of class
“Institutional priorities” of colleges. Do you think an URM at TJ who is in top 10% at TJ would fare better in elite college admissions than a top 10% URM at base high school? I’m guessing that with IP being more focused on URM/1st gen/Low-income lately, an URM at TJ who does well (around 4.4 gpa or maybe even lower?) may have a higher chance at being admitted over a non URM with a 4.6 GPA and more rigorous coursework? Has this been the situation at TJ (and other schools) lately?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do top colleges know that it is harder to get As at TJ vs base high school? Or do they view a 4.6 at TJ the same as a 4.6 at Oakton, Chantilly, Madison etc
AOs typically compare kids to other kids in the same school first. So a 4.6 GPA kid from TJ would be weighed against a 4.4 kid from TJ, and GPA would be one metric of comparison, along with other activities and "institutional priorities". Along with GPA they would look at class rank, or if the school doesn't rank, use bands - top 1%, top 5%, top 10% of class
Anonymous wrote:Do top colleges know that it is harder to get As at TJ vs base high school? Or do they view a 4.6 at TJ the same as a 4.6 at Oakton, Chantilly, Madison etc
Anonymous wrote:Do top colleges know that it is harder to get As at TJ vs base high school? Or do they view a 4.6 at TJ the same as a 4.6 at Oakton, Chantilly, Madison etc
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i read this on another forum.
I know things are crazy this admissions season, country-wide.
How are things at TJ?
It's really gone downhill, but hopefully the changes to admission will help address these failings in years to come.
You must be crying because of all the envy and disdain. Stop crying and whining and try to do better.
Not sure what you're going on about but I couldn't be happier with TJ's new direction. Things should start looking up once the kids who got in because of test buying graduate.
No, things will get better due to the evisceration of affirmative action coming to the top colleges/universities near you in Summer blockbuster hit.
Yup, ending the Asian discrimination in college admissions will definitely increase the top 20 acceptances from about 80 to 160.
Hate to break it to you, but colleges are going to admit who they want to admit and they'll come up with a different way to do it. Especially private universities. And FCPS is going to find a way to do the same thing with TJ. The courts won't save you - you need to actually have positions that are popular enough to win elections.
The bottom line is that colleges and universities are businesses, and it's not good business for them in today's environment to have a predominance of any race, ethnicity, or other demographic in their student body.
Other forward-thinking businesses have recognized that there are multiple ways to achieve and demonstrate merit - should it come as a surprise that elite universities have followed in their footsteps?
We shall overcome this despicable racial discrimination against Asians someday.
People like you won’t be happy until TJ and all of the Ivies and MIT and Caltech are 100% Asian.
Despite their Asian segregation fantasies, it will never happen. The UC system has been race-blind for decades and provides a realistic glimpse of what we can expect.
But keep in mind California has a much higher percentage of Asians than most of the remainder of the US.
The UC system is not race-blind.