Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You are wealthy, not middle class.
They may or may not be middle class, but one thing is for sure that makes it harder to suss out—they’re old. DW is 62–this is a far older couple than are typically reporting net worth on DCUM. They may have been earning under $125k combined and have this level of savings at this age if they were aggressive savers throughout. On the other hand, they may have a $500k HHI and have been frittering it away. I would call that more stupid than wealthy but the point is—it would have been a very different path to this result than an aggressive saver’s lifestyle.
Yes, we are very aggressive savers. We have a HHI of $200k (which in our VHCOL area is very middle class) and max out our 401k/SEP/Roth, etc. Not having kids helps in the savings department, but we have supported our parents and siblings extensively over the years. We are NOT counting on them for our retirement, so that lit a fire for us to make sure we have the money for any care we might need.
You are NOT middle class let alone very middle class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You are wealthy, not middle class.
They may or may not be middle class, but one thing is for sure that makes it harder to suss out—they’re old. DW is 62–this is a far older couple than are typically reporting net worth on DCUM. They may have been earning under $125k combined and have this level of savings at this age if they were aggressive savers throughout. On the other hand, they may have a $500k HHI and have been frittering it away. I would call that more stupid than wealthy but the point is—it would have been a very different path to this result than an aggressive saver’s lifestyle.
Yes, we are very aggressive savers. We have a HHI of $200k (which in our VHCOL area is very middle class) and max out our 401k/SEP/Roth, etc. Not having kids helps in the savings department, but we have supported our parents and siblings extensively over the years. We are NOT counting on them for our retirement, so that lit a fire for us to make sure we have the money for any care we might need.
Anonymous wrote:For those trying to save as much as possible, do you forgo vacations? What is your budget for family vacations?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t want to be critical to the future retirees at 70 poster, but I remember clearly during my Lamaze/childbirth classes, the psychologist advised us future parents to avoid living in very close proximity with our in-laws. He said, “live at least over an hour away.”
Hard disagree. Just posted that my parents live 15 minutes away and it is perfect. For example, today (Saturday) we plan to drop them off after afternoon activities for a sleepover, have the evening to ourselves, and pick them up tomorrow morning for a lunchtime birthday party. We couldn’t do that if they lived an hour away.
Also I thought the comment about retiring at 70 due to cerebral jobs was interesting. Looking around my own cerebral workplace the number of people experiencing health problems in theirs 50s angv6ps necessitating retirement is depressing.
Anonymous wrote:For those trying to save as much as possible, do you forgo vacations? What is your budget for family vacations?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are going to retire at 70 - DH and I both have cerebral jobs. We are going to sell our house and move in with our son - he and his wife have an inlaw apartment that is a perfect size for what DH and I want in an older stage of life. Their house is in a great area with tons to do, good hospitals and we are active people who hopefully won't have mobility issues. Our two DD's live ten minutes and a half hour from DS so we'll be pretty close to all the kids.
You. Are. Nightmare. Parents.
I mean I don’t plan on doing with but this is such an Americanized view of family. You know that in many parts of the world multigenerational living is the norm? And that as the middle class gets squeezed out, it might become the norm in the US as well?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are going to retire at 70 - DH and I both have cerebral jobs. We are going to sell our house and move in with our son - he and his wife have an inlaw apartment that is a perfect size for what DH and I want in an older stage of life. Their house is in a great area with tons to do, good hospitals and we are active people who hopefully won't have mobility issues. Our two DD's live ten minutes and a half hour from DS so we'll be pretty close to all the kids.
You. Are. Nightmare. Parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You are wealthy, not middle class.
They may or may not be middle class, but one thing is for sure that makes it harder to suss out—they’re old. DW is 62–this is a far older couple than are typically reporting net worth on DCUM. They may have been earning under $125k combined and have this level of savings at this age if they were aggressive savers throughout. On the other hand, they may have a $500k HHI and have been frittering it away. I would call that more stupid than wealthy but the point is—it would have been a very different path to this result than an aggressive saver’s lifestyle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I would have LOVED if my parents had moved in with us. We have a huge house for just DW & I and parents who lived thousands of miles away in Florida. When they got older and developed health problems, we had to keep flying down to help take care of them, which was really hard. We begged them to move in with us and would have loved for them to have spent their last years in our home.
Anonymous wrote:
What are your normal person retirement plans? What are the best choices you feel you've made in this respect? Any regrets? What worries you most? Are you moving to a lower COL area or hoping to retire in your home once it's paid off? Does social security factor into your plans? How do you plan for end-of-life care? Will you have enough to do some of your bucket list retirement goals, like travel or being able to help pay for grandkids to go to college?
We are about 8 years away from retirement in a HCOL area with very high property taxes. We have saved about 1.5mil and are aiming for 2.3mil. No pensions. I think it'll be plenty for our bucket list of travel, but my DW fears we'll need more for end-of-life care, since we don't have kids. We both are also OK going to somewhere that will help us shuffle off this mortal coil if we have a diagnosis that seems bleak.
My spouse plans to work until 70 and do p-t work until she doesn't want to anymore. I plan to retire when she hits 70 (I'm 6 years younger) or taper to part time work sooner if possible. My FT job pays for our health insurance, so I'm trying to keep working as long as possible to hold on to that or at least until my spouse hits 65.
We have a mortgage now and will downsize to a smaller home without a mortgage with slightly lower taxes when we retire. We love our area and would rather be in a smaller house here than a bigger house in a LCOL or MCOL area. Our friends are here, the culture and food we love is here, the access to great airports is here, and -- most importantly -- the access to world-class medical care and top specialists.
You are wealthy, not middle class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are going to retire at 70 - DH and I both have cerebral jobs. We are going to sell our house and move in with our son - he and his wife have an inlaw apartment that is a perfect size for what DH and I want in an older stage of life. Their house is in a great area with tons to do, good hospitals and we are active people who hopefully won't have mobility issues. Our two DD's live ten minutes and a half hour from DS so we'll be pretty close to all the kids.
You. Are. Nightmare. Parents.
Anonymous wrote:No one has really answered your question, OP, which leads me to believe that no one wants to admit what their plans are or no one wants to admit that they don't have a plan.