Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think she just has a big personality and not much of a filter, but is basically a nice person.
I assume it’s this.
Yeah that’s not the definition of nepotism.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is aging beautifullly and has an enviable career as a 60+ yo in Hollywood. She did many of her own stunts in Halloween, which is laudable …but she is and always will be a Nepo baby who probably didn’t deserve that Oscar. I don’t blame her however.
lots of nep kids of Ivy leagues also don't deserve what they have, but such is life.
Anonymous wrote:She is aging beautifullly and has an enviable career as a 60+ yo in Hollywood. She did many of her own stunts in Halloween, which is laudable …but she is and always will be a Nepo baby who probably didn’t deserve that Oscar. I don’t blame her however.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love that movie and watch it every Christmas.Anonymous wrote:If you like Jamie Lee Curtis, I recommend *not* watching “Christmas with the Kranks”. It’s excruciatingly bad and you will lose a lot of respect for her.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion of course, but seriously check out the reviews:
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/christmas_with_the_kranks/reviews?intcmp=rt-what-to-know_read-critics-reviews
Anonymous wrote:I love that movie and watch it every Christmas.Anonymous wrote:If you like Jamie Lee Curtis, I recommend *not* watching “Christmas with the Kranks”. It’s excruciatingly bad and you will lose a lot of respect for her.
I love that movie and watch it every Christmas.Anonymous wrote:If you like Jamie Lee Curtis, I recommend *not* watching “Christmas with the Kranks”. It’s excruciatingly bad and you will lose a lot of respect for her.
Anonymous wrote:I thought I once read that she had both a male and female chromosome?
Anonymous wrote:I like her b/c she is Christopher Guest adjacent.
Once you realize that actors are by definition batsh!t crazy - and comedians even more so - and stop projecting your sense of /your expectations of normalcy on them, it becomes much easier to understand.
I mean, who could be crazier than Tom Cruise! and he's among the most successful!
It's their jobs to try to appear "normal" so they can appeal to a larger fan base. But remember people, it's all an ACT.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, I find her very annoying.
I don't think she's a great actress and I found her performance in EEAAO pretty hammy, though I think that suited the style of storytelling and the filmmakers were smart to cast her because it was mildly gimmicky (as much of their casting was) in a way that works within the context of the story.
Her whole things seems to me that she is likable and "down to earth" because she sees herself as downtrodden somehow. But this is based on being: an older woman in Hollywood, a not-stick-thin woman in Hollywood, a relatively normal-looking woman in Hollywood. But, uh, that's not relatable to me at all, nor does that qualify you as somehow beleaguered. She's Tony Curtis's daughter! She had the ultimate in for the industry and used it to get big roles in big movies early in her career. The fact that since then she has chosen to allow herself to age normally is laudable, but it doesn't somehow make her downtrodden.
I mean, most of us are also "aging naturally" and experience way less discrimination for it in our jobs, but that's because our jobs are not "Hollywood actress" and never could be because we were not born into that industry.
It's just silly. She's a wealthy, privileged woman who's never really had to work in any normal, recognizable capacity the way most people do. She's incredibly privileged and no amount of middle-aged weight gain or jowls is going to change that. I've got middle aged weight gain and jowls to, Jaime Lee. I'm not downtrodden -- I'm an UMC white lade with a college degree, I've been pretty lucky in life.