Anonymous wrote:The short answer is because of lack of density. In a SFH environment, only a few houses can be close enough to what you want to walk to it.
I live in Pimmit Hills in 22043, which is walkable by the suburban definition of the word. Kids walk and bike to their ES, we walk to metro, library, parks and CAN walk to several grocery stores but we obviously don't walk to stores because I don't want to carry my shopping on foot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because schools are big. ES have 500+ kids instead of small ones. And it only gets bigger from there.
+1
Everything is on a massive scale.
Yes. And even if you do find something walkable it's very rare to be walkable to ES and MS and HS.
My kids had a bus to ES but are walkable to MS and HS and I really appreciate that. ES kids still need parents to take them to/from school so the walkability is of limited value IMO. But the independence for teens in getting to/from school has been great.
??? My children walked/biked/scooted/took the bus to their ES school starting in 1st grade. Can't imagine taking them to school through ES if it was walkable...
This is such BS. I walked 2 miles RT from my parents’ home to ES K-6. My sister did the same. We only started taking the school bus when my parents moved to a rural area. Before that we were living in a typical 1960s-70s suburb. I feel sorry for today’s over-supervised and scheduled children. When will they grow up and gain their independence?
Anonymous wrote:We live in Alexandria (Eastern Fairfax County part) and are walkable to elementary and middle, about a 1 mile to High School and 1/4 mile to grocery store. People will dump all over our high schools here, but honestly they are fine and if your kid is engaged and has parents at home they can thrive. FWIW - We have loved walking to schools AND being 2 miles from the beltway.
Anonymous wrote: We have made this country so damn ugly in the name of car worship.
Anonymous wrote:Much of the area zoned to Murch is walkable to stores and all three schools! But agree this is super hard to find.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The short answer to your question is 50+ years of poor urban planning and car-centric design. In most cases, the decision to make things unwalkable was very much on purpose. We've (mostly) realized the error of that approach by now, but walkable spaces are now pretty scarce outside of pre-WWII neighborhoods, and they're enough in demand that they go for a large price premium even though walkability doesn't really cost more to build.
We're starting to retrofit walkable infrastructure into suburban neighborhoods, but it'll take decades, and we're limited with what can be done within the constraints of many of the choices that are already baked in.
Ding ding ding. Basically op, it’s literally illegal to build walkable neighborhoods in most of America. That’s the reason AU Park is so absurdly expensive
And AU Park sucks. Who wants to walk to what they can walk to besides Wagshals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because schools are big. ES have 500+ kids instead of small ones. And it only gets bigger from there.
+1
Everything is on a massive scale.
Yes. And even if you do find something walkable it's very rare to be walkable to ES and MS and HS.
My kids had a bus to ES but are walkable to MS and HS and I really appreciate that. ES kids still need parents to take them to/from school so the walkability is of limited value IMO. But the independence for teens in getting to/from school has been great.
??? My children walked/biked/scooted/took the bus to their ES school starting in 1st grade. Can't imagine taking them to school through ES if it was walkable...
Anonymous wrote:Because families want to live in single family homes, not high-rise condos. Single family homes need large lots. Large lots with low density = lower walkability.
As someone currently raising kids in a triplex in a highly walkable urban neighborhood, I now totally get why someone would choose a SFH in a low-density neighborhood even though it means life in a car.
Anonymous wrote:I hate to be an Arlington band wagon person but if I wanted that urban balance not in DC (let’s face it, DC is not getting a safer anytime soon so I would not realistically consider it) I would choose that orange line corridor.
Not the very north/McLean wannabe part of Arlington but the actual urban part of it.
Otherwise you may as well live in Vienna or n Bethesda or an exurb for something further out that does not cost 2.5m for a decent house.
Anonymous wrote:We live in Arlington- near ballston and have to drive to hs.
Everything else is walkable- but really if I am doing a real shopping trip I am not walking back from Harris teeter or target with 5 bags.
I guess the nice thing about living here is that if I do drive anywhere in the county or dc max is 20 minutes, normally under 10.