Anonymous wrote:If their phone does not have a case, they are rich.
Disagree. I would argue that, if your phone needs a case, you made a bad choice in phones. If a device is too flimsy to survive ordinary use, then the appropriate response should be to buy a more durable device, not to put some rubberized appendage on it in order to make up for the device's poor design.
Anonymous wrote:If their phone does not have a case, they are rich.
Disagree. I would argue that, if your phone needs a case, you made a bad choice in phones. If a device is too flimsy to survive ordinary use, then the appropriate response should be to buy a more durable device, not to put some rubberized appendage on it in order to make up for the device's poor design.
Anonymous wrote:Luxury cars like Mercedes.
If their phone does not have a case, they are rich.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Number of piercings (fewer is better)
Number of tattoos (same criteria as above)
No smoking
How thin the person is
Where they went to school in k-12
+1
Tattoos & piercings are very low class. Don't care how much money they have, i do not want them as my neighbors.
Ha! Becoming old is going to be very rough for you. These days young people of any class background get tattoos and you can’t do anything about them moving next to you. They still comin’.
Yes, we can spot trashy new money from a mile away.
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wearing brands such as, and pretty much exclusively:
Ralph Lauren
Brooks Brothers
LL Bean
Oxford shoes
I automatically assume someone is broke AF when I see them with:
Long fake nails
Michael Kors, Coach, Louis Vuitton branded anything
Fake hair
Pump heels
Showing their belly button in public
That’s because of the cultural bubble you grew up in. Many of these things are typical of wealthy people just not in your WASP culture.
Yes, and we’ll always think they look broke as sh*t. Devoid of class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Indian Americans.
They live below their means but most are rich. Even the poors have enough to pay for kids college, big fat 100K weddings, retirement, paid off home, kid's first car etc.
How do they do it?
B/c they have no retirement and expect their kids to pay for their life past 60. They aren't rich.
This is not true at all. Indian-Americans are the wealthiest ethnic group in US.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_the_United_States_by_household_income
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Indian Americans.
They live below their means but most are rich. Even the poors have enough to pay for kids college, big fat 100K weddings, retirement, paid off home, kid's first car etc.
How do they do it?
B/c they have no retirement and expect their kids to pay for their life past 60. They aren't rich.
This is not true at all. Indian-Americans are the wealthiest ethnic group in US.
Anonymous wrote:Your bracelet stack says everything.