Anonymous wrote: the loser Republicans on this thread are so predictable in their misogyny and simultaneous fear of the fact that she was a reliable witness.

And she’s not even the point of Brett Kavanaugh. The point is that he is unfit for the bench in temperament and in his total and complete lack of honor. The other point is that the GOP is corrupt and corrupts everything they touch. They are unfit.

Ahem I'm reading much from loser Dems on this thread.

We have a great SCOTUS in place.

Irrespective of what you Kavanaugh tree huggers think, this documentary is making headlines and, maybe, this time there will be an impartial investigation. He won't be impeached with McCarthy's GOP House but there will be a Dem controlled house and it's a Sword of Damacles for Kavanaugh.

https://www.indiewire.com/2023/01/justice-review-brett-kavanaugh-documentary-1234802266/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe that someone could watch both testimonies and walk away from that thinking that Kavanaugh was fit to be on the Supreme Court. All he needed to do was the calmly say something like how he didn’t believe that he was possible of doing that, that he did have a drinking problem when he was a teenager and that he’s spent the rest of his life trying to be a supporter of women by hiring a greater percentage of female clerks than the vast majority of judges. People who would be willing to say that people can change from their 18-year old selves. Instead he lied about his drinking, he lied about his behaviors in high school and college and he went completely unhinged about the Clintons and how he hates all Democrats. Frankly we should only have justices who can rise above partisanship- instead was have an immoral, unhinged, extreme partisan on the court. Just what we need.

NOT ONE THING KAVANAUGH SAID or "should have said" would have satisfied any of you rabid liberals.
Try being falsely accused of gang rape - very publicly - and then calmly respond to ridiculous questions.
And, he lied about NOTHING.

You folks need to just get over your Kavanaugh fetish and resign yourselves to the fact that he is on the Supreme Court and will remain there for a very long time.
Even though there are some among your ranks that have considered assassinating him.

He lied about nothing? Didn't he deny all the escapades of Bart O Kavanaugh that were documented in his buddy's book?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Calling CBF a"hot mess," that you can tell that she is lying just by looking at her, she doesn't remember dates, times, people after decades are victim blaming. People like you are the reason rape victims do not want to testify and rapists go free.

Shame on all of you

Yet people saying they can tell Kavanaugh is lying just by looking at him are reasonable right?

The screeching, nastiness, combativeness... totally unhinged. Do you remember his exchange with Amy Klobuchar?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/

And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.

Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.

I hope you never serve in a jury.

Guilt or innocence should be established on facts, not feelings.

True.
And, Ford came with no facts whatsoever. Even the people she claimed to have been present (including her best friend) could not confirm her story.
She had no dates, places, or anything close to facts.

She was lucky not to be prosecuted for perjury.

Oh SHE is lucky not to be prosecuted for perjury???? How about "Roe is settled law"????

Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe that someone could watch both testimonies and walk away from that thinking that Kavanaugh was fit to be on the Supreme Court. All he needed to do was the calmly say something like how he didn’t believe that he was possible of doing that, that he did have a drinking problem when he was a teenager and that he’s spent the rest of his life trying to be a supporter of women by hiring a greater percentage of female clerks than the vast majority of judges. People who would be willing to say that people can change from their 18-year old selves. Instead he lied about his drinking, he lied about his behaviors in high school and college and he went completely unhinged about the Clintons and how he hates all Democrats. Frankly we should only have justices who can rise above partisanship- instead was have an immoral, unhinged, extreme partisan on the court. Just what we need.

+1 The people who support Bretty after that mess are blinded by partisanship. They’re the same people who pretend not to see the political violence their party has caused, who look away from the open fraud and corruption in their party and who will support corruption and judicial activism from the bench. They’re a lost cause.

But for the sane people who don’t know what to think, go back and rewatch both testimonies. Sit with the fact that Kennedy had already hired his clerks before suddenly retiring, and that his son worked at Deutschebank where Donald owed millions. That Kavanaugh owed huge sums that were mysteriously paid off. Think about how, in normal non-corrupt judgeships, even the appearance of possible impropriety isn’t done. That the FBI did not investigate a single tip received about Kavanaugh, that no investigation was done at all, that all tips were funneled to… the White House.

Literally nothing about Kavanaugh bespeaks for the bench, especially not his partisan targeting of the Clintons’ private lives and then his moaning about people looking into his.

Anonymous wrote:Calling CBF a"hot mess," that you can tell that she is lying just by looking at her, she doesn't remember dates, times, people after decades are victim blaming. People like you are the reason rape victims do not want to testify and rapists go free.

Shame on all of you

Yet people saying they can tell Kavanaugh is lying just by looking at him are reasonable right?

Anonymous wrote:I cannot believe that someone could watch both testimonies and walk away from that thinking that Kavanaugh was fit to be on the Supreme Court. All he needed to do was the calmly say something like how he didn’t believe that he was possible of doing that, that he did have a drinking problem when he was a teenager and that he’s spent the rest of his life trying to be a supporter of women by hiring a greater percentage of female clerks than the vast majority of judges. People who would be willing to say that people can change from their 18-year old selves. Instead he lied about his drinking, he lied about his behaviors in high school and college and he went completely unhinged about the Clintons and how he hates all Democrats. Frankly we should only have justices who can rise above partisanship- instead was have an immoral, unhinged, extreme partisan on the court. Just what we need.

NOT ONE THING KAVANAUGH SAID or "should have said" would have satisfied any of you rabid liberals.
Try being falsely accused of gang rape - very publicly - and then calmly respond to ridiculous questions.
And, he lied about NOTHING.

You folks need to just get over your Kavanaugh fetish and resign yourselves to the fact that he is on the Supreme Court and will remain there for a very long time.
Even though there are some among your ranks that have considered assassinating him.

I cannot believe that someone could watch both testimonies and walk away from that thinking that Kavanaugh was fit to be on the Supreme Court. All he needed to do was the calmly say something like how he didn’t believe that he was possible of doing that, that he did have a drinking problem when he was a teenager and that he’s spent the rest of his life trying to be a supporter of women by hiring a greater percentage of female clerks than the vast majority of judges. People who would be willing to say that people can change from their 18-year old selves. Instead he lied about his drinking, he lied about his behaviors in high school and college and he went completely unhinged about the Clintons and how he hates all Democrats. Frankly we should only have justices who can rise above partisanship- instead was have an immoral, unhinged, extreme partisan on the court. Just what we need.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/

And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.

Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.

I hope you never serve in a jury.

Guilt or innocence should be established on facts, not feelings.

True.
And, Ford came with no facts whatsoever. Even the people she claimed to have been present (including her best friend) could not confirm her story.
She had no dates, places, or anything close to facts.

So why did the Judiciary Committee Republicans pull the prosecutor they hired while she was questioning her?

So why are you making stuff up? If you had read the prosecutor's memo after the questioning you'd know why she thought Ford's testimony was not credible

So why did they pull her off the job in the middle of the hearing right when she was zeroing in on a date in the calendar when the assault could have occurred?

Calling CBF a"hot mess," that you can tell that she is lying just by looking at her, she doesn't remember dates, times, people after decades are victim blaming. People like you are the reason rape victims do not want to testify and rapists go free.

Shame on all of you

the loser Republicans on this thread are so predictable in their misogyny and simultaneous fear of the fact that she was a reliable witness.

And she’s not even the point of Brett Kavanaugh. The point is that he is unfit for the bench in temperament and in his total and complete lack of honor. The other point is that the GOP is corrupt and corrupts everything they touch. They are unfit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/

And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.

Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.

I hope you never serve in a jury.

Guilt or innocence should be established on facts, not feelings.

True.
And, Ford came with no facts whatsoever. Even the people she claimed to have been present (including her best friend) could not confirm her story.
She had no dates, places, or anything close to facts.

So why did the Judiciary Committee Republicans pull the prosecutor they hired while she was questioning her?

So why are you making stuff up? If you had read the prosecutor's memo after the questioning you'd know why she thought Ford's testimony was not credible

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/

And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.

Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.

I hope you never serve in a jury.

Guilt or innocence should be established on facts, not feelings.

True.
And, Ford came with no facts whatsoever. Even the people she claimed to have been present (including her best friend) could not confirm her story.
She had no dates, places, or anything close to facts.

So why did the Judiciary Committee Republicans pull the prosecutor they hired while she was questioning her?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirmation hearings. If proved that he lied during these hearings, then he can be impeached. Fat chance, I know but it will be a lot more than a ripple.

https://variety.com/2023/film/news/brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-documentary-sundance-1235495305/amp/

And, if Ford lied can she be prosecuted? Because I believe that is much more likely.

Ford clearly lied. I watched her testimony and she showed all signs of lying.

I hope you never serve in a jury.

Guilt or innocence should be established on facts, not feelings.

True.
And, Ford came with no facts whatsoever. Even the people she claimed to have been present (including her best friend) could not confirm her story.
She had no dates, places, or anything close to facts.

She was lucky not to be prosecuted for perjury.