Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“The widening deficit, which was $587 billion in 2016, is due in part to increased government spending and the $1.5 trillion tax cut package signed by Mr. Trump in 2017.”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/whats-in-the-budget-deal-negotiated-by-congress-and-the-white-house/
Funny to read that quote now. Trump's tax reform proved to improve the economy in 2018 and 2019 in ways that were both predictable and apparently mysterious to CBS "journalists"
Trump’s tax cuts had no net positive effect on economic growth. What minimal benefits they might have added were offset by the money taken from the economy to service the increased debt.
Not only were his tax cuts of absolutely no benefit to the economy, but his attacks on the IRS meant that we lost more money.
You folks are truly crazy. The Trump tax reform, controversial as it was, proved to be a massive success in the economic data of 2018, 2019 and 2020 up to Covid. Look it up,
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“The widening deficit, which was $587 billion in 2016, is due in part to increased government spending and the $1.5 trillion tax cut package signed by Mr. Trump in 2017.”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/whats-in-the-budget-deal-negotiated-by-congress-and-the-white-house/
Funny to read that quote now. Trump's tax reform proved to improve the economy in 2018 and 2019 in ways that were both predictable and apparently mysterious to CBS "journalists"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“The widening deficit, which was $587 billion in 2016, is due in part to increased government spending and the $1.5 trillion tax cut package signed by Mr. Trump in 2017.”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/whats-in-the-budget-deal-negotiated-by-congress-and-the-white-house/
Funny to read that quote now. Trump's tax reform proved to improve the economy in 2018 and 2019 in ways that were both predictable and apparently mysterious to CBS "journalists"
Trump’s tax cuts had no net positive effect on economic growth. What minimal benefits they might have added were offset by the money taken from the economy to service the increased debt.
Not only were his tax cuts of absolutely no benefit to the economy, but his attacks on the IRS meant that we lost more money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“The widening deficit, which was $587 billion in 2016, is due in part to increased government spending and the $1.5 trillion tax cut package signed by Mr. Trump in 2017.”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/whats-in-the-budget-deal-negotiated-by-congress-and-the-white-house/
Funny to read that quote now. Trump's tax reform proved to improve the economy in 2018 and 2019 in ways that were both predictable and apparently mysterious to CBS "journalists"
Trump’s tax cuts had no net positive effect on economic growth. What minimal benefits they might have added were offset by the money taken from the economy to service the increased debt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:“The widening deficit, which was $587 billion in 2016, is due in part to increased government spending and the $1.5 trillion tax cut package signed by Mr. Trump in 2017.”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/whats-in-the-budget-deal-negotiated-by-congress-and-the-white-house/
Funny to read that quote now. Trump's tax reform proved to improve the economy in 2018 and 2019 in ways that were both predictable and apparently mysterious to CBS "journalists"
Anonymous wrote:“The widening deficit, which was $587 billion in 2016, is due in part to increased government spending and the $1.5 trillion tax cut package signed by Mr. Trump in 2017.”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/whats-in-the-budget-deal-negotiated-by-congress-and-the-white-house/
Anonymous wrote:Oh yay. Another government shutdown coming down the pike.
Haven't Republicans yet learned that those have never worked in their favor? I guess they really want to throw their 2024 chances away.
Anonymous wrote:
They are delusional. It doesn’t work like that. The debt ceiling is about redeeming Treasury securities. That’s it. Treasury securities don’t authorize or obligate where the money goes. That is already provided for in law and appropriations. It took them 15 tries to elect their leader as Speaker. They probably won’t even be able to pass their dumb shit in the House, much less hold the line against the Senate and President.
Anonymous wrote:The 2011 debt ceiling crisis was the low-water mark of Obama’s presidency:
Politically, the crisis caused support for the Republican Party to drop, whose support for the debt-ceiling deal was needed as it controlled the House. The party saw its approval ratings drop from 41 percent in July to 33 percent in August.[128] Nevertheless, President Obama saw his approval ratings drop to a record low of 40 percent in regards to his handling of the crisis.[129]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_United_States_debt-ceiling_crisis
Obama negotiated in 2011 and as a result Republicans are back for more hostage-taking and will have *massive* demands. As I noted in another thread, Biden’s best strategy, which hopefully he learned at Obama’s side in 2011, is to ask for a clean debt limit increase over and over again, then when the pressure and heat become absolutely unbearable Ned Beatty will have a private meeting with Kevin McCarthy: