Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You have a husband problem. Helping with dishes and stripping the bed aren't big asks. Your problem is that your spouse is fine letting you do all kid wrangling.
This is your issue. Ask DH to strip the beds and help with dishes when the kids go to bed. You have added 5 people's worth of dishes and cups to your ILs sink for every single meal. Of course you and DH should help out.
These are your kids. While it would be nice if the grandparents read to and played with the kids, some just are not into that for more than an hour here or there. They miss THIER SON and want to catch up and spend time with him. They are not your sitters (and they likely do not need you to entertain them, again they miss him).
He can visit them solo. Have you suggested this? I visit my parents twice a year without my DH and kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting how you perceive to be taking care of your kids as being treated like a nanny.
Ha! Exactly!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here.
This actually isn’t as strictly gendered as some suggest, and FYI my MIL is super successful in her field and made about ten times more money than FIL, who did most of the childcare when DH was a kid and continues to be the main person who grocery shops and cleans.
But I think EVERYONE should contribute and be helpful. I’m the same way when we have guests with kids, and honestly it’s fun to occupy kids you don’t see often. But if they don’t want to interact much with our kids, at least they could do other host things to help us out.
I will NEVER be like them when my kids are grown and come visit. It’s no wonder we don’t visit ILs very often.
The fact that you think it’s fun to occupy kids you don’t see that often is where the disconnect is. I love my kids but I can fully acknowledge that when they were under 5 entertaining them for more than about 20 minutes was not that fun for other people, and was no one’s responsibility but mine and DHs. And I only had 2 of them not 3. It’s not reasonable to expect other people to entertain your 3 very young children for long stretches.
If my parents or inlaws had this attitude about their grandchildren, we would have seen them a whole lot less.
What in the world? They are your kids, you decided to have them, ultimate responsibility lies with you. Why did you have kids? Were they to be a git to your parents and in-laws?
Did you read the post I am responding to? Did you see how many times she talks about "fun?" Do you want to be an engaged grandparent to the age your grandkids actually are? Or are you just looking for fun? Because schlepping little kids to their grandparents' house is not fun for the adult children.
Again, thank goodness my parents and in-laws were a great help with kids that age.
The PP is acknowledging it's not fun to be around little kids all day or expect others to entertain them. Are you the one responding that you wouldn't visit people who think that little kids are sometimes a drag? Because if you are I think that's ridiculous. They are your kids and your job no matter whose house you're in. You don't get to put your feet up and relax and foist toddlers on grandparents all who may not be up to the job. My kids aren't that old, I have 3 of them, the youngest is 7. I know exactly what all this is like. But at the end of the day, my kids, my problem.
No, I wouldn't visit people with my children who thought my children are a drag.
You think your kids are a drag which is why you're trying to pawn them off on someone else.
You truly sound like a miserable person. Is it because no one has ever helped you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You have a husband problem. Helping with dishes and stripping the bed aren't big asks. Your problem is that your spouse is fine letting you do all kid wrangling.
This is your issue. Ask DH to strip the beds and help with dishes when the kids go to bed. You have added 5 people's worth of dishes and cups to your ILs sink for every single meal. Of course you and DH should help out.
These are your kids. While it would be nice if the grandparents read to and played with the kids, some just are not into that for more than an hour here or there. They miss THIER SON and want to catch up and spend time with him. They are not your sitters (and they likely do not need you to entertain them, again they miss him).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You have a husband problem. Helping with dishes and stripping the bed aren't big asks. Your problem is that your spouse is fine letting you do all kid wrangling.
This is your issue. Ask DH to strip the beds and help with dishes when the kids go to bed. You have added 5 people's worth of dishes and cups to your ILs sink for every single meal. Of course you and DH should help out.
These are your kids. While it would be nice if the grandparents read to and played with the kids, some just are not into that for more than an hour here or there. They miss THIER SON and want to catch up and spend time with him. They are not your sitters (and they likely do not need you to entertain them, again they miss him).
Anonymous wrote:Interesting how you perceive to be taking care of your kids as being treated like a nanny.
Anonymous wrote:You have a husband problem. Helping with dishes and stripping the bed aren't big asks. Your problem is that your spouse is fine letting you do all kid wrangling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here.
This actually isn’t as strictly gendered as some suggest, and FYI my MIL is super successful in her field and made about ten times more money than FIL, who did most of the childcare when DH was a kid and continues to be the main person who grocery shops and cleans.
But I think EVERYONE should contribute and be helpful. I’m the same way when we have guests with kids, and honestly it’s fun to occupy kids you don’t see often. But if they don’t want to interact much with our kids, at least they could do other host things to help us out.
I will NEVER be like them when my kids are grown and come visit. It’s no wonder we don’t visit ILs very often.
The fact that you think it’s fun to occupy kids you don’t see that often is where the disconnect is. I love my kids but I can fully acknowledge that when they were under 5 entertaining them for more than about 20 minutes was not that fun for other people, and was no one’s responsibility but mine and DHs. And I only had 2 of them not 3. It’s not reasonable to expect other people to entertain your 3 very young children for long stretches.
If my parents or inlaws had this attitude about their grandchildren, we would have seen them a whole lot less.
What in the world? They are your kids, you decided to have them, ultimate responsibility lies with you. Why did you have kids? Were they to be a git to your parents and in-laws?
Did you read the post I am responding to? Did you see how many times she talks about "fun?" Do you want to be an engaged grandparent to the age your grandkids actually are? Or are you just looking for fun? Because schlepping little kids to their grandparents' house is not fun for the adult children.
Again, thank goodness my parents and in-laws were a great help with kids that age.
The PP is acknowledging it's not fun to be around little kids all day or expect others to entertain them. Are you the one responding that you wouldn't visit people who think that little kids are sometimes a drag? Because if you are I think that's ridiculous. They are your kids and your job no matter whose house you're in. You don't get to put your feet up and relax and foist toddlers on grandparents all who may not be up to the job. My kids aren't that old, I have 3 of them, the youngest is 7. I know exactly what all this is like. But at the end of the day, my kids, my problem.
No, I wouldn't visit people with my children who thought my children are a drag.
You think your kids are a drag which is why you're trying to pawn them off on someone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here.
This actually isn’t as strictly gendered as some suggest, and FYI my MIL is super successful in her field and made about ten times more money than FIL, who did most of the childcare when DH was a kid and continues to be the main person who grocery shops and cleans.
But I think EVERYONE should contribute and be helpful. I’m the same way when we have guests with kids, and honestly it’s fun to occupy kids you don’t see often. But if they don’t want to interact much with our kids, at least they could do other host things to help us out.
I will NEVER be like them when my kids are grown and come visit. It’s no wonder we don’t visit ILs very often.
The fact that you think it’s fun to occupy kids you don’t see that often is where the disconnect is. I love my kids but I can fully acknowledge that when they were under 5 entertaining them for more than about 20 minutes was not that fun for other people, and was no one’s responsibility but mine and DHs. And I only had 2 of them not 3. It’s not reasonable to expect other people to entertain your 3 very young children for long stretches.
If my parents or inlaws had this attitude about their grandchildren, we would have seen them a whole lot less.
What in the world? They are your kids, you decided to have them, ultimate responsibility lies with you. Why did you have kids? Were they to be a git to your parents and in-laws?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here.
This actually isn’t as strictly gendered as some suggest, and FYI my MIL is super successful in her field and made about ten times more money than FIL, who did most of the childcare when DH was a kid and continues to be the main person who grocery shops and cleans.
But I think EVERYONE should contribute and be helpful. I’m the same way when we have guests with kids, and honestly it’s fun to occupy kids you don’t see often. But if they don’t want to interact much with our kids, at least they could do other host things to help us out.
I will NEVER be like them when my kids are grown and come visit. It’s no wonder we don’t visit ILs very often.
The fact that you think it’s fun to occupy kids you don’t see that often is where the disconnect is. I love my kids but I can fully acknowledge that when they were under 5 entertaining them for more than about 20 minutes was not that fun for other people, and was no one’s responsibility but mine and DHs. And I only had 2 of them not 3. It’s not reasonable to expect other people to entertain your 3 very young children for long stretches.
If my parents or inlaws had this attitude about their grandchildren, we would have seen them a whole lot less.
What in the world? They are your kids, you decided to have them, ultimate responsibility lies with you. Why did you have kids? Were they to be a git to your parents and in-laws?
Did you read the post I am responding to? Did you see how many times she talks about "fun?" Do you want to be an engaged grandparent to the age your grandkids actually are? Or are you just looking for fun? Because schlepping little kids to their grandparents' house is not fun for the adult children.
Again, thank goodness my parents and in-laws were a great help with kids that age.
The PP is acknowledging it's not fun to be around little kids all day or expect others to entertain them. Are you the one responding that you wouldn't visit people who think that little kids are sometimes a drag? Because if you are I think that's ridiculous. They are your kids and your job no matter whose house you're in. You don't get to put your feet up and relax and foist toddlers on grandparents all who may not be up to the job. My kids aren't that old, I have 3 of them, the youngest is 7. I know exactly what all this is like. But at the end of the day, my kids, my problem.
No, I wouldn't visit people with my children who thought my children are a drag.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here.
This actually isn’t as strictly gendered as some suggest, and FYI my MIL is super successful in her field and made about ten times more money than FIL, who did most of the childcare when DH was a kid and continues to be the main person who grocery shops and cleans.
But I think EVERYONE should contribute and be helpful. I’m the same way when we have guests with kids, and honestly it’s fun to occupy kids you don’t see often. But if they don’t want to interact much with our kids, at least they could do other host things to help us out.
I will NEVER be like them when my kids are grown and come visit. It’s no wonder we don’t visit ILs very often.
The fact that you think it’s fun to occupy kids you don’t see that often is where the disconnect is. I love my kids but I can fully acknowledge that when they were under 5 entertaining them for more than about 20 minutes was not that fun for other people, and was no one’s responsibility but mine and DHs. And I only had 2 of them not 3. It’s not reasonable to expect other people to entertain your 3 very young children for long stretches.
If my parents or inlaws had this attitude about their grandchildren, we would have seen them a whole lot less.
What in the world? They are your kids, you decided to have them, ultimate responsibility lies with you. Why did you have kids? Were they to be a git to your parents and in-laws?
Did you read the post I am responding to? Did you see how many times she talks about "fun?" Do you want to be an engaged grandparent to the age your grandkids actually are? Or are you just looking for fun? Because schlepping little kids to their grandparents' house is not fun for the adult children.
Again, thank goodness my parents and in-laws were a great help with kids that age.
The PP is acknowledging it's not fun to be around little kids all day or expect others to entertain them. Are you the one responding that you wouldn't visit people who think that little kids are sometimes a drag? Because if you are I think that's ridiculous. They are your kids and your job no matter whose house you're in. You don't get to put your feet up and relax and foist toddlers on grandparents all who may not be up to the job. My kids aren't that old, I have 3 of them, the youngest is 7. I know exactly what all this is like. But at the end of the day, my kids, my problem.
No, I wouldn't visit people with my children who thought my children are a drag.
Also the "putting your feet" "reading novels" and whatever else has been thrown around seems to be red herring because OP has said no one has assisted with the kids and the kids are supposed to play alone in another room. So, no, I would not visit someone like that when I had small kids.
So you’ll let your unrealistic expectations ruin your relationships with your parents or ILs. Got it.
(And for the record, why would op want free babysitting if not to put her feet up? You make no sense.)