Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe having to excel in two spheres (work and home) is easier for women, on avg, and harder for men, on avg. Combine that with the fact that women, on average, don't withhold sex until marriage, you're going to see an increasing number of males not striving to be the best version of themselves.
If the past 50 years can be considered a success for women, someone else is going to be less successful. Social and political revolutions always have knock on effects.
Financial independence is nothing to sneer at, but there are always going to be trade offs and making men less essential could very well mean that their incentives to fulfill our ideals as husband's as father's have been cratered.
Agree, there isn't much incentive today for males to strive to be the best version of themselves.
But if women's standards are higher, in theory, wouldn't that be incentive enough?
Duh, if they are getting free sex via grinder, find no pushback companionship from a dog and daily life is satisfying at this level, what incentive is there?
So you are saying men are becoming gay video gamers with dogs? What is the incentive for women then? Why are women finding incentive and not men?
Hey, I didn't say women had incentives. There are just as many women who find companionship from canines and get sexual satisfaction via quickie hookup apps too.
However, there might be an incentive from knowing that the biological clock has a limit. Men assume they have no biological clock (it's kind of contested by research though).
Anonymous wrote:It's funny that most of the loser soy-boys women here are complaining about were themselves raised by single moms. Sad to see a million years of evolution flushed down the toilet by a couple of generations of poor parenting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Matchmakers (women) are quitting because single women have become completely unreasonable with their wish lists and high standards. The men are dating younger or are dating foreign women.
So, yes.
+1
American women have a captive audience. The vast majority of men never seek out women from other countries and it's 100% their fault. The difference in quality is night and day. I've yet to find an American male expat who prefers American women.
What with the superior qualities known to be hoarded by men who are ex-pats, you'd think this would bother American women, but no.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Matchmakers (women) are quitting because single women have become completely unreasonable with their wish lists and high standards. The men are dating younger or are dating foreign women.
So, yes.
+1
American women have a captive audience. The vast majority of men never seek out women from other countries and it's 100% their fault. The difference in quality is night and day. I've yet to find an American male expat who prefers American women.
When I lived in Europe and met a newly arrived, single American woman out like at a networking event, all us jaded expats would start taking bets on how long she'd last. Few made it to the 6 month mark. They were so used to getting attention in the US, but the expat and local men preferred the local women for various reasons.
It’s the “various reasons” bits that are fascinating…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Matchmakers (women) are quitting because single women have become completely unreasonable with their wish lists and high standards. The men are dating younger or are dating foreign women.
So, yes.
+1
American women have a captive audience. The vast majority of men never seek out women from other countries and it's 100% their fault. The difference in quality is night and day. I've yet to find an American male expat who prefers American women.
Anonymous wrote:Matchmakers (women) are quitting because single women have become completely unreasonable with their wish lists and high standards. The men are dating younger or are dating foreign women.
So, yes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Matchmakers (women) are quitting because single women have become completely unreasonable with their wish lists and high standards. The men are dating younger or are dating foreign women.
So, yes.
+1
American women have a captive audience. The vast majority of men never seek out women from other countries and it's 100% their fault. The difference in quality is night and day. I've yet to find an American male expat who prefers American women.
When I lived in Europe and met a newly arrived, single American woman out like at a networking event, all us jaded expats would start taking bets on how long she'd last. Few made it to the 6 month mark. They were so used to getting attention in the US, but the expat and local men preferred the local women for various reasons.
Yeah. Europe started world war I and II. I'm not sure what type of people they are meeting but in no way are those counties more civilized.
It’s the “various reasons” bits that are fascinating…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Matchmakers (women) are quitting because single women have become completely unreasonable with their wish lists and high standards. The men are dating younger or are dating foreign women.
So, yes.
+1
American women have a captive audience. The vast majority of men never seek out women from other countries and it's 100% their fault. The difference in quality is night and day. I've yet to find an American male expat who prefers American women.
When I lived in Europe and met a newly arrived, single American woman out like at a networking event, all us jaded expats would start taking bets on how long she'd last. Few made it to the 6 month mark. They were so used to getting attention in the US, but the expat and local men preferred the local women for various reasons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe having to excel in two spheres (work and home) is easier for women, on avg, and harder for men, on avg. Combine that with the fact that women, on average, don't withhold sex until marriage, you're going to see an increasing number of males not striving to be the best version of themselves.
If the past 50 years can be considered a success for women, someone else is going to be less successful. Social and political revolutions always have knock on effects.
Financial independence is nothing to sneer at, but there are always going to be trade offs and making men less essential could very well mean that their incentives to fulfill our ideals as husband's as father's have been cratered.
Hold on. So women, who only recently got the right to work and to exist independently outside of a man, picked up the skill of multi-tasking through osmosis while men's ability to cope and do the same fell in the gutter? And their increased ability to function took away mens' ability to function due to a limited supply? Sure Jan.
I think this is pretty insulting to every woman who lived before 1960. What do you think the avg woman's life was like before reliable birth control and a washing machine. Yes, I think women, on average, have always been better at multitasking then men, on avg.
There’s “multitasking” and then there is literally fighting their way into careers that were closed to women as recently as mothers and grandmothers day, and somehow that is the less challenging task than learning to fold laundry? I think you’re doing a disservice to every woman who became a pilot, a diplomat, a judge, a surgeon in the last 40 years…
The average woman today will never become a pilot, a diplomat, a judge or a surgeon. But now it's also a hell of a lot harder for her to become a mother and wife.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe having to excel in two spheres (work and home) is easier for women, on avg, and harder for men, on avg. Combine that with the fact that women, on average, don't withhold sex until marriage, you're going to see an increasing number of males not striving to be the best version of themselves.
If the past 50 years can be considered a success for women, someone else is going to be less successful. Social and political revolutions always have knock on effects.
Financial independence is nothing to sneer at, but there are always going to be trade offs and making men less essential could very well mean that their incentives to fulfill our ideals as husband's as father's have been cratered.
Agree, there isn't much incentive today for males to strive to be the best version of themselves.
And what is the best version of manhood? As far as I can tell from this thread it's to be a good feminist. Do we raise our daughters with that sort of reverence and respect for the capabilities of men? My 8 year old son sees all of the girl power stuff my daughter has. There are no 'boy power' t-shirts and stickers.
Yeah it’s so sad that there are so few examples of men in power for them to aspire to…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe having to excel in two spheres (work and home) is easier for women, on avg, and harder for men, on avg. Combine that with the fact that women, on average, don't withhold sex until marriage, you're going to see an increasing number of males not striving to be the best version of themselves.
If the past 50 years can be considered a success for women, someone else is going to be less successful. Social and political revolutions always have knock on effects.
Financial independence is nothing to sneer at, but there are always going to be trade offs and making men less essential could very well mean that their incentives to fulfill our ideals as husband's as father's have been cratered.
Agree, there isn't much incentive today for males to strive to be the best version of themselves.
But if women's standards are higher, in theory, wouldn't that be incentive enough?
Duh, if they are getting free sex via grinder, find no pushback companionship from a dog and daily life is satisfying at this level, what incentive is there?
So you are saying men are becoming gay video gamers with dogs? What is the incentive for women then? Why are women finding incentive and not men?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Matchmakers (women) are quitting because single women have become completely unreasonable with their wish lists and high standards. The men are dating younger or are dating foreign women.
So, yes.
+1
American women have a captive audience. The vast majority of men never seek out women from other countries and it's 100% their fault. The difference in quality is night and day. I've yet to find an American male expat who prefers American women.