Anonymous
11/19/2022 07:54
Subject: Re:Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:the FBI announced to the public that the documents they seized from Pres. Trump at Mar-a-Lago were mementos of his time at the White House.
Link?
WaPo and other papers.
Anonymous
11/19/2022 07:46
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Trump announced running for President, which made it a potential conflict.
There was always a political conflict! You know who kept telling us that? MERRICK GARLAND!
The special counsel should’ve been appointed 2 years ago. Garland is a spineless POS. He’s just kicking the can down the road.
That's what I don't understand - why wasn't the SC appointed two years ago? Is there an answer to that question?
Anonymous
11/19/2022 07:35
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Because now Republicans are taking over, and they need an excuse to not have things revealed to the public about January 6th.
So far they showed edited videos, and not the whole truth. They don't want people knowing about FBI agents among the Trump supporters, egging them on.
All of this can now be claimed as the property of the special prosecutor.
You're claiming entrapment now? For the insurrection?
Oh.
Anonymous
11/19/2022 07:00
Subject: Re:Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
the FBI announced to the public that the documents they seized from Pres. Trump at Mar-a-Lago were mementos of his time at the White House.
Link?
Anonymous
11/19/2022 06:45
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Because now Republicans are taking over, and they need an excuse to not have things revealed to the public about January 6th.
So far they showed edited videos, and not the whole truth. They don't want people knowing about FBI agents among the Trump supporters, egging them on.
All of this can now be claimed as the property of the special prosecutor.
100% correct. When it became evident the Rs had the house, Guiliani’s case was dropped and the FBI announced to the public that the documents they seized from Pres. Trump at Mar-a-Lago were mementos of his time at the White House.
Anonymous
11/19/2022 01:49
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Because now Republicans are taking over, and they need an excuse to not have things revealed to the public about January 6th.
So far they showed edited videos, and not the whole truth. They don't want people knowing about FBI agents among the Trump supporters, egging them on.
All of this can now be claimed as the property of the special prosecutor.
You should post it on Truth Social (which neither propagates the truth nor is social).
Anonymous
11/19/2022 01:12
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Because now Republicans are taking over, and they need an excuse to not have things revealed to the public about January 6th.
So far they showed edited videos, and not the whole truth. They don't want people knowing about FBI agents among the Trump supporters, egging them on.
All of this can now be claimed as the property of the special prosecutor.
Anonymous
11/19/2022 00:26
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Trump announced running for President, which made it a potential conflict.
There was always a political conflict! You know who kept telling us that? MERRICK GARLAND!
The special counsel should’ve been appointed 2 years ago. Garland is a spineless POS. He’s just kicking the can down the road.
So Trump should’ve appointed one to investigate himself? Because that’s who was President two years ago.
I’m embarrassed for you that you think being obtuse is a good look.
I’m embarrassed for anyone who thinks Garland who wasn’t even confirmed until a year and a half ago was in a position two years ago to appoint a special counsel to look into crimes that weren’t evident until a year ago.
Garland took the oath in March 2021, which is a year and 9 months ago. That’s almost 2 years ago.
Trump has been committing crimes for decades. Fine, though… the Mueller report was completed in March 2019, which is almost 4 years ago.
My apologies for thinking you were being obtuse. It seems you’re just not very bright.
Anonymous
11/19/2022 00:17
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Trump announced running for President, which made it a potential conflict.
There was always a political conflict! You know who kept telling us that? MERRICK GARLAND!
The special counsel should’ve been appointed 2 years ago. Garland is a spineless POS. He’s just kicking the can down the road.
So Trump should’ve appointed one to investigate himself? Because that’s who was President two years ago.
I’m embarrassed for you that you think being obtuse is a good look.
I’m embarrassed for anyone who thinks Garland who wasn’t even confirmed until a year and a half ago was in a position two years ago to appoint a special counsel to look into crimes that weren’t evident until a year ago.
Anonymous
11/18/2022 23:35
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Trump announced running for President, which made it a potential conflict.
There was always a political conflict! You know who kept telling us that? MERRICK GARLAND!
The special counsel should’ve been appointed 2 years ago. Garland is a spineless POS. He’s just kicking the can down the road.
So Trump should’ve appointed one to investigate himself? Because that’s who was President two years ago.
I’m embarrassed for you that you think being obtuse is a good look.
Anonymous
11/18/2022 23:10
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Yes. Trump should be in jail. After the insurrection we had National Guard troops sleeping in the Capitol. Walking into the Capitol the morning of the inauguration and seeing the troops and boarded up windows was heartbreaking. Trump is the biggest PoS ever.
Anonymous
Anonymous
11/18/2022 22:25
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Trump announced running for President, which made it a potential conflict.
There was always a political conflict! You know who kept telling us that? MERRICK GARLAND!
The special counsel should’ve been appointed 2 years ago. Garland is a spineless POS. He’s just kicking the can down the road.
So Trump should’ve appointed one to investigate himself? Because that’s who was President two years ago.
Anonymous
11/18/2022 22:09
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is Garland appointing a special prosecutor now? Why not before?
Trump announced running for President, which made it a potential conflict.
There was always a political conflict! You know who kept telling us that? MERRICK GARLAND!
The special counsel should’ve been appointed 2 years ago. Garland is a spineless POS. He’s just kicking the can down the road.
Anonymous
11/18/2022 22:00
Subject: Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ so... better for the Democrats, then?
Obviously the GOPs continued self destruction and decent into madness is good for the democrats. Not great for the country or democracy though.
If it would mean that the GOP would finally fully self destruct, it would be great. They don’t though, they just get worse and worse.