Anonymous wrote:They are the Thomas Kinkade of jewelry.

This sums it up best. This and the Alhambra bracelet are the Coach purse for the middle class.

Op as others have said if you want to spend this amount on a bracelet, you can find much better workmanship and quality.

Also jewelry, like cars, are not investments. The people at the jewelry counter who tell you that are lying to you. Diamonds do not appreciate. Jewelry does not appreciate.

Anonymous wrote:You’re asking if a $7,000 bangle is a necessity?

😭😭

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, get what you like and ignore the haters. I have two diamond ones and love them. My husband purchased them for me for significant events in my life. If you don’t want to wear a bracelet that you can’t take off, I’d try the Juste en Clou.

OP here thank you. I didn’t expect so many people to be so frustrated with my Q.

Nobody is frustrated with your Q, we're just confused about why you would buy yourself something that is meant to be a gift just because all your friends have one. It's kind of sad.

You’re sounding quite condescending 👆. I’m sure it’s unintentional. Just thought you should know.

OP, Buy the bracelet if you like it and can afford it. If somebody asks you can buy it for you just say it yourself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I suppose it’s more attractive than a David Yurman silver twist.

I actually prefer the David Yurman. So out it's in!

I do not believe that you genuinely prefer David Yurman to Cartier.

Anonymous wrote:Twenty five years ago I thought these were unique and distinctive.

There are now a lot of counterfeits on the market just like Rolex watches.

Oh I could not wear a count of it. I will not want to support the counterfeit market.

Anonymous wrote:I would buy myself one. If I wanted to spend that much. Which I don't.

But would you be embarrassed? What if people asked you who bought it for you?

Anonymous wrote:Definitely a necessity.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. I love them. I don’t have one, nor could I justify the expense but I think if you love something and can afford it, go for it.

How many people can actually afford this though?

Cartier is staying in business somehow, right?

Anonymous wrote:NP. I love them. I don’t have one, nor could I justify the expense but I think if you love something and can afford it, go for it.

How many people can actually afford this though?

Twenty five years ago I thought these were unique and distinctive.

There are now a lot of counterfeits on the market just like Rolex watches.

🤣🤣🤣 at the stupid Juste Un Clou bracelet, it means it’s just a nail. Exactly, it’s just s f&&@ng nail that people pay thousands for. Not even cute design. Money doesn’t equal good taste.

And since we’re at it, does anyone care about the weight of the jewelry bc that’s important too.

Anonymous wrote:I suppose it’s more attractive than a David Yurman silver twist.

I actually prefer the David Yurman. So out it's in!

I suppose it’s more attractive than a David Yurman silver twist.

Anonymous wrote:They are the Thomas Kinkade of jewelry.

Gucci double G belt buckle : belts :: LV Neverfull:purses :: Cartier Love:bracelets

Definitely a necessity.