Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Anyone who cares needs to review all the video footage in the hallway. There actually are uniformed cops trying to get into that room, but there’s a tall white man in a black polo shirt at the classroom door, facing the cops with both arms raised high, preventing anyone from breaking in to that classroom. Apparently he had some clout, otherwise the cops would have knocked him out of their way.

Then he needs to spend some time in jail.

So odd how most people are blaming the cops, when there clearly was on video an outsider preventing the cops from accessing the classroom door. Why is no media demanding his name, and which government agency he came from?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Anyone who cares needs to review all the video footage in the hallway. There actually are uniformed cops trying to get into that room, but there’s a tall white man in a black polo shirt at the classroom door, facing the cops with both arms raised high, preventing anyone from breaking in to that classroom. Apparently he had some clout, otherwise the cops would have knocked him out of their way.

Then he needs to spend some time in jail.

Anonymous wrote:
Anyone who cares needs to review all the video footage in the hallway. There actually are uniformed cops trying to get into that room, but there’s a tall white man in a black polo shirt at the classroom door, facing the cops with both arms raised high, preventing anyone from breaking in to that classroom. Apparently he had some clout, otherwise the cops would have knocked him out of their way.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I would have more respect for police if they didn't support an increase in the number of armed citizens and if they didn't support AR-15s in the hands of civilians. You would think that the opposite would be true--that cops would want fewer guns on the street so that they wouldn't have to fear for their lives every time they go out on a shift. But, no, they want MORE guns under the theory that a "good guy" with a gun can help prevent mass shootings. Even though that rarely happens IRL...

Basically we're in a domestic arms race where "bad guys" and cops are equipped with more and more weapons and fear and paranoia increase.

The "good guy with a gun" who killed two terrorists in the recent Jerusalem bus station attack five days ago was shot and killed by Israeli soldiers while he was kneeling on the ground with his hands up in the air. Netanyahu coldly responded to reporters about the tragic killing of the hero - "That's life."
https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/04/middleeast/castleman-israel-jerusalem-hamas-shot-backlash-intl/index.html
https://www.timesofisrael.com/family-says-yuval-castleman-killed-after-taking-out-terrorists-was-executed/

Cops killed the "good guy with a gun" in the Arvada, CO mass shooting:
https://www.cpr.org/2022/06/22/olde-town-arvada-shooting-johnny-hurley/

What do soldiers in Israel have to do with mass shootings in U.S. schools? Did you have trouble staying on topic in school? Your comment will get lost when you could have posted it in an appropriate thread. You are just rage farming. There is no multinational police plot to kill citizens. Just a bunch of localized, incompetent cowards.

On the contrary, I find PP’s examples of the “good guy with a gun” being killed by other good guys with guns to be enlightening about the fallacy of “more weapons means more safety” argument.