Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

You are an awful person.

I wish I knew her husband so I could call him and let him know his wife is a whore screwing other men behind his back.

Why the misogyny? Can’t you come up with a non-gendered word for two spouses engaged in the same behavior?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

You are an awful person.

I wish I knew her husband so I could call him and let him know his wife is a whore screwing other men behind his back.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t blame the other woman. She is irrelevant. Men or spouses aren’t property. They have a brain and their own free will. It is up to them alone (and with their spouse) to keep their marriage intact

You sound dumb. It's takes two to have a relationship so how is she irrelevant when she's the other party in the relationship w/a married man? Does she become relevant if she gives the husband an STD? Is she relevant is she gets pregnant and suddenly your children have a new sibling? Or when he decides he wants to leave his wife and then your children are spending half their time at this woman's place with their dad? Clearly the husband is at fault, clearly he made the commitment, but too many women are willing to entangle themselves and ultimately have a hand in wrecking lives.

I can tell you this, the betrayed wife will never forget the OW. She has created mental trauma in another woman—and often her kids. You think it doesn’t matter. Sure- it wasn’t a big deal. The wife will remember everything about the OW and her image will be seared on her brain, not in a good way. The rest of the OW’s life she has invited all kinds of negative energy her way. It is so crazy to have the mindset that contributing to an innocent person’s anguish and trauma is not partly on you. Mental gymnastics are big on the cheating game for both parties.

I do believe if you keep putting bad out in the universe and knowingly harming other people, being dishonest, lacking integrity, it eventually catches up with you. Not necessarily karma per se, but going through life participating in things you know will cause great anguish in someone else will eventually bite you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t blame the other woman. She is irrelevant. Men or spouses aren’t property. They have a brain and their own free will. It is up to them alone (and with their spouse) to keep their marriage intact

You sound dumb. It's takes two to have a relationship so how is she irrelevant when she's the other party in the relationship w/a married man? Does she become relevant if she gives the husband an STD? Is she relevant is she gets pregnant and suddenly your children have a new sibling? Or when he decides he wants to leave his wife and then your children are spending half their time at this woman's place with their dad? Clearly the husband is at fault, clearly he made the commitment, but too many women are willing to entangle themselves and ultimately have a hand in wrecking lives.

I can tell you this, the betrayed wife will never forget the OW. She has created mental trauma in another woman—and often her kids. You think it doesn’t matter. Sure- it wasn’t a big deal. The wife will remember everything about the OW and her image will be seared on her brain, not in a good way. The rest of the OW’s life she has invited all kinds of negative energy her way. It is so crazy to have the mindset that contributing to an innocent person’s anguish and trauma is not partly on you. Mental gymnastics are big on the cheating game for both parties.

Anonymous wrote:Thoughts: poor character, dishonest, untrustworthy, zero empathy, classless, selfish, low self-esteem and can’t find a single man. Trash person that deserves all harm she invites in her life by doing this to another woman.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

I’ve seen that before. Then the woman starts putting the pressure on and changing the circumstances and wanting more. Such a load of crap.

Anonymous wrote:I don’t blame the other woman. She is irrelevant. Men or spouses aren’t property. They have a brain and their own free will. It is up to them alone (and with their spouse) to keep their marriage intact

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I noticed with the Adam Levine controversy that the super feminist take among younger millennials and Gen Z is to victimize the “other woman” and make the husband the sole perpetrator, including situations where the husband is famous and known to be married with kids. The husband IS most responsible for cheating on his wife, I agree with that. He’s the one who made promises he broke. But do women really not owe anything to other women anymore? It’s totally fine to be a side chick now , even when it’s publicly known that the wife has little kids at home?

I feel like I’m taking crazy pills watching all these young women fall all over themselves to defend that TikToker who had the affair with Adam Levine. I don’t care what lies he fed her, she knew he was married and she was an adult when their affair started. It’s interesting to me that it’s considered “unfeminist” to call her out for being a homewrecker or to tell her t9 shut her legs to married men. Why can’t two things be true at once? Adam Levine is a trash husband and I hope his wife leaves with half his fortune. But knowingly sleeping with married men is trash behavior too.

So is your thesis “we are not being adequately cruel as a society to a woman who exposed a man for cheating on his wife”? Are you afraid that the scarlet letter she embroidered for herself was too beautiful?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t blame the other woman. She is irrelevant. Men or spouses aren’t property. They have a brain and their own free will. It is up to them alone (and with their spouse) to keep their marriage intact

You sound dumb. It's takes two to have a relationship so how is she irrelevant when she's the other party in the relationship w/a married man? Does she become relevant if she gives the husband an STD? Is she relevant is she gets pregnant and suddenly your children have a new sibling? Or when he decides he wants to leave his wife and then your children are spending half their time at this woman's place with their dad? Clearly the husband is at fault, clearly he made the commitment, but too many women are willing to entangle themselves and ultimately have a hand in wrecking lives.

Anonymous wrote:I don’t blame the other woman. She is irrelevant. Men or spouses aren’t property. They have a brain and their own free will. It is up to them alone (and with their spouse) to keep their marriage intact

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

You are an awful person.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was OW, I didn't feel like I was harming the DW because I had no intention of breaking up her family. And when you think about it, I gotta give Sumner credit -- she could've dimed him out ages ago, but she didn't. She kept her mouth shut, she was discreet, no harm came to Behati. It wasn't until Sumner's friend tried to sell the story that Sumner herself came forward.

But honestly though, if Behati had an expectation of monogamy, she's a fool.

Yeah right. He never would have married you. It wasn’t even a consideration for him. Lol

Nor for me. We were both clear upfront that we weren't leaving our marriages.