Anonymous wrote:Lawyer here.
You are pulling all these "facts" from the lawsuit itself, filed by the plaintiff, which never went to court. Assault charges were filed but then dropped so any allegations of assault are unsubstantiated. He was convicted of hazing meaning he participated in in hazing, which sucks. But the whole point of fraternity hazing (which is awful) is that it is institutionalized abuse. You take insecure college kids who are looking for somewhere to belong, you abuse them, and then you tell them they now get to abuse other people who want admission to their club. Hazing is terrible but it is on the organization.
Keep in mind if Hamm joined that fraternity, he must have gone through the same hazing rituals. Meaning the stuff he participated in with the plaintiff in that suit likely happened to him, too. And then recall this was a guy who'd lost both his parents, had been neglected growing up... it's not an excuse for committing acts of violence against something but basically he joined a cult and bad things were done to him and he did bad things to others. And after that happened there's not a single report of Hamm being violent or hurtful. He spend nearly 20 years in a relationship with a woman who still speaks of him affectionately. He is well liked by friends and castmates, including the children he worked with on Mad Men.
There's nothing to indicate that he for sure did the things he is accused of having done, only in participating in hazing rituals in this messed up fraternity he joined. It's really good the hazing came to light and the fraternity was shut down. I feel awful for what happened to the plaintiff in that case. But you and I don't actually know exactly what transpired or what Hamm's role was, and all indications are that he never did anything even resembling those allegations ever again. Also, he was held accountable for the hazing! And he didn't fight the assault charges, they were dropped.
I am really big on accountability but to me it sounds like Hamm was accountable for his actions, and that the real culprit there was the fraternity that was rightfully closed. It's weird to keep holding this against Hamm simply because he's the one person involved in that incident who you know later became rich and famous.
Anonymous wrote:Lawyer here.
You are pulling all these "facts" from the lawsuit itself, filed by the plaintiff, which never went to court. Assault charges were filed but then dropped so any allegations of assault are unsubstantiated. He was convicted of hazing meaning he participated in in hazing, which sucks. But the whole point of fraternity hazing (which is awful) is that it is institutionalized abuse. You take insecure college kids who are looking for somewhere to belong, you abuse them, and then you tell them they now get to abuse other people who want admission to their club. Hazing is terrible but it is on the organization.
Keep in mind if Hamm joined that fraternity, he must have gone through the same hazing rituals. Meaning the stuff he participated in with the plaintiff in that suit likely happened to him, too. And then recall this was a guy who'd lost both his parents, had been neglected growing up... it's not an excuse for committing acts of violence against something but basically he joined a cult and bad things were done to him and he did bad things to others. And after that happened there's not a single report of Hamm being violent or hurtful. He spend nearly 20 years in a relationship with a woman who still speaks of him affectionately. He is well liked by friends and castmates, including the children he worked with on Mad Men.
There's nothing to indicate that he for sure did the things he is accused of having done, only in participating in hazing rituals in this messed up fraternity he joined. It's really good the hazing came to light and the fraternity was shut down. I feel awful for what happened to the plaintiff in that case. But you and I don't actually know exactly what transpired or what Hamm's role was, and all indications are that he never did anything even resembling those allegations ever again. Also, he was held accountable for the hazing! And he didn't fight the assault charges, they were dropped.
I am really big on accountability but to me it sounds like Hamm was accountable for his actions, and that the real culprit there was the fraternity that was rightfully closed. It's weird to keep holding this against Hamm simply because he's the one person involved in that incident who you know later became rich and famous.
So, did he and Flo break up?Anonymous wrote:with his 34 year old gf
https://pagesix.com/2022/09/20/jon-hamm-says-he-may-marry-girlfriend-anna-osceola/
What about his long suffering long term ex gf who really wanted children?
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s weird to call it an “incident”. It was a vicious, life ruining, unprovoked sex crime. To me, personally, it’s impossible for a decent person to have done that. DUI, theft.. I can forgive. If he did what they say, he is a sadist, plain and simple.
The details aren’t stomach turning to you? You think he should be a parent? Now I have to go look up what Mitt Romney apparently did…sheesh
You sound completely hysterical. It was part of a fraternity hazing where are participants were assuredly drinking heavily, and where the pledge could have left. He was punished, the fraternity was shut down.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Guess he's finally grown up.
Here's the scariest twist in this saga - he left UT to become a daycare worker in St. Louis. Yikes!!!
University records show that he left school in the same semester that the alleged hazing occurred, the AP reported. He returned to St. Louis, where he became a daycare teacher at the University of Missouri.
Anonymous wrote:Guess he's finally grown up.
Anonymous wrote:It’s weird to call it an “incident”. It was a vicious, life ruining, unprovoked sex crime. To me, personally, it’s impossible for a decent person to have done that. DUI, theft.. I can forgive. If he did what they say, he is a sadist, plain and simple.
The details aren’t stomach turning to you? You think he should be a parent? Now I have to go look up what Mitt Romney apparently did…sheesh
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How can PP’s still say things like “I hope he’s happy” after reading about the hazing? Are you parents? Imagine his victim were your son. Or you believe it’s not true…or that time heals all wounds? Please explain it to me because I genuinely don’t get it. I can’t see a photo of him without feeling revulsion
Because I'm 50 years old and I'm not going to allow a fraternity hazing incident from over 30 years ago, one for which he was prosecuted, punished, and then received received probation for influence my perception of him for all time.