Anonymous wrote:Wow. With everything said above, what exactly is the point of private school? Seems like it’s worse than a good public school.
Anonymous wrote:Warped perspective on the world wrt socioeconomic situations
Anonymous wrote:Teachers go out of the way to make learning fun.
Anonymous wrote:
This. I'm not saying the way they teach is bad- but there's little pressure to keep up with the pedagogy and best practices. I like DD's teachers, but I haven't yet seen the kind of creative, innovative ideas that we saw and see in public. All these kids will be fine and they will go on to good high schools and colleges, so there just isn't the pressure to do better.
Anonymous wrote:I was a MoCo public school kid many years ago and my mom taught at top MoCo public school (now retired). My husband and his family are die hard for private schools, even though we live in MoCo with great public schools. We are lucky to have family help pay for a top private school. I figured it would be hard to look that gift horse in the mouth, but the cons have been surprising to me:
-no real diversity. Plenty of wokeness - which is generally good, but it feels more like they're conditioning kids to see lower middle and poor as "others" to be pitied and donated to, NOT actually developing any true understanding or empathy which is a HUGE con. It is important to develop social responsibility and a "give back" ethic, it should be with empathy and understanding. Maybe in the upper grades that comes in?
- keeping my kids (one in particular) from becoming a spoiled brat is now 1000000 times harder.
- smaller classes does not mean effective teaching. We are spending additional thousands on a tutor (who finds teaching our kid easy, so not really sure what happened in classes). Obv this is one that's highly depending on the student.
- It feels like people are there more for the reputation and networking, not actually the "values" the school is known for.
- Feeling like it's SOOO not worth the $ since we live in MoCo - is worth the $ if you'd be at most DC public schools. I should mention that I really don't like "brands" where people flock without regard to the quality or function, so it is reasonable to say that I don't think the school is really all that fabulous (not bad, but does live up to my expectations). I'm also not so rich that I don't have to work and/or have no sense of $. Again, this one is probably VERY student specific
-Later on it'll be harder to get into college from this school vs a public school (unless they're really top of the class and even if I assume kids are capable, they are not looking like they're quite that motivated and I am not going to be crazy pushy)
Anonymous wrote:Kids of major donors get a pass when they kick your kid in the shins….
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Conspicuous consumption competition. The other kids have designer this and limited edition that and all the latest tech. It’s impossible to keep up. We preach non-materialism at home and our kids are mostly believers, but having constant conversations about reigning in jealousy and us always having to say no really drains me. And it drains the kids.
I could have written this exact statement. I have noticed this too at our child's private middle school. It pains me bc I grew up in a family that struggled to make ends meet, and I worked very hard to get to where we are today. Our child thinks we are poor, whereas we have no trouble paying for food, shelter, and discretionary expenses within reason. Our teaching of non-materialism isn't sticking the way we had hoped, though maybe this is just a phase.
Also, the kids live throughout the DC area so it's really hard to get together outside school.
We might switch back to public - each has its pros and cons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wish I had dug a little deeper and realized how little they push the kids in math.
I stupidly went into this thinking that smaller class size means my kid gets a lot more attention than in public. Actually my kid is getting a little bit more attention, because all of the families are expecting their kid (and themselves as parents/consumers) to get a lot more attention than in public. I also stupidly thought that all the kids at our not-that-competitive private would be bright and have no major issues, when in fact many of them are at this school precisely *because* they need extra help and were falling behind.
This was the big surprise for me. I pulled my public school kid thinking they would be more challenged and surrounded by better behaved kids and it was exactly the opposite. Be very careful where you go. We had lots of behavioral problems - including one girl who basically should be institutionalized yet was allowed to remain in the class terrorizing all of the boys and girls and barely passing - mostly Ds and Cs. But she would not have survived public school - she would have drowned - so we were "graced" with her presence.
Yes! And the parent denial of special needs. Oh, she just needs a smaller class size. Oh, he's an active boy. No problems here. In the public system, disruptive kids are often identified as ADHD or ASD and sometimes the parents try private school to avoid a diagnosis. So the kid struggles. It's hard to watch.