Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had my third at 42, and had also just felt like we were missing someone. I got lucky and had an easy pregnancy and healthy, easygoing baby. I will say that now, in early 50s, I’m much less energetic than I imagined I would be but it’s manageable and I can’t imagine our family without him.
You did not always feel like you were missing someone. That’s absurd and made up.
I don’t know, I have three and after each pregnancy except for my last I was already sure that I wanted another. After my third pregnancy I no longer had that feeling and felt my family was complete. I’m sure I would have gotten over it with time but if I had only had two kids I would’ve definitely felt like I was missing something.
Sorry your first two kids didn’t fulfill you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had my third at 42, and had also just felt like we were missing someone. I got lucky and had an easy pregnancy and healthy, easygoing baby. I will say that now, in early 50s, I’m much less energetic than I imagined I would be but it’s manageable and I can’t imagine our family without him.
You did not always feel like you were missing someone. That’s absurd and made up.
I don’t know, I have three and after each pregnancy except for my last I was already sure that I wanted another. After my third pregnancy I no longer had that feeling and felt my family was complete. I’m sure I would have gotten over it with time but if I had only had two kids I would’ve definitely felt like I was missing something.
Sorry your first two kids didn’t fulfill you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had my third at 42, and had also just felt like we were missing someone. I got lucky and had an easy pregnancy and healthy, easygoing baby. I will say that now, in early 50s, I’m much less energetic than I imagined I would be but it’s manageable and I can’t imagine our family without him.
You did not always feel like you were missing someone. That’s absurd and made up.
I don’t know, I have three and after each pregnancy except for my last I was already sure that I wanted another. After my third pregnancy I no longer had that feeling and felt my family was complete. I’m sure I would have gotten over it with time but if I had only had two kids I would’ve definitely felt like I was missing something.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I had my third at 42, and had also just felt like we were missing someone. I got lucky and had an easy pregnancy and healthy, easygoing baby. I will say that now, in early 50s, I’m much less energetic than I imagined I would be but it’s manageable and I can’t imagine our family without him.
You did not always feel like you were missing someone. That’s absurd and made up.
Anonymous wrote:I had my third at 42, and had also just felt like we were missing someone. I got lucky and had an easy pregnancy and healthy, easygoing baby. I will say that now, in early 50s, I’m much less energetic than I imagined I would be but it’s manageable and I can’t imagine our family without him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My neighbor had a child at 46 - her first. So, she's 54 with a 2nd grader and will be 64 when that child is a senior in high school. While they are happy, those numbers would make me think hard about the long-term implications of your deicsion to have a baby at 43.
I never get the people who do the math like this. What does it mean to you to be 54 with a 2nd grader? Or 64 with a child who is a senior? Is that any more shocking than being, say, 50 with a second grader? Or being 60 when your child is a senior in high school? 54 and 60 both feel eons away to me. I’m 44, so they aren’t! My daughter is in kindergarten. I think I’m supposed to be so shocked at those ages that I would never consider having a baby at an advanced age, but that math never works on me. Had my one and only child at 39. I’m not having more because I feel old enough NOW, thank you, but not because 60 sounds too old to have a high school kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:now that I'm 50+ I'm SO THANKFUL that i don't have a young child.
I felt like I was 20 years old until I was about 47. Then age really caught up with me. Many of my friends feel the same way--late 40s is hard on women. Aging accelerates.
This - I’m 45 and am really starting to feel my age. I’m so glad to no longer be parenting little kids because I couldn’t do it at this age. I’m sure everyone is different but I’m shocked how exhausted I am.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^ I hope you’re the same person who keeps posting this theme over and over. As a 42-year old, I just don’t want it to be true!
I have never posted this but I can tell you at 47, my current age, I feel (and look) worlds different than 42. I have aged so much. I feel like I am falling apart. Sadly. I could not handle a 4 year-old right now.
Anonymous wrote:I find the sibling bond is stronger with just two than with three, especially if the three are spaced far apart. How it will affect the family dynamic depends on the ages of the other two.
Anonymous wrote:It's incredibly selfish to have a child that old. My mother had me when she was 40 and she died when I was four. Maybe you won't be diagnosed with breast cancer when this child is two but maybe you will and leave a four year old motherless. Get a puppy.
Anonymous wrote:^ I hope you’re the same person who keeps posting this theme over and over. As a 42-year old, I just don’t want it to be true!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just can't help but look around the dinner table thinking ... we're not all here yet.
If that makes ANY sense at all.
That's beautiful.
Anonymous wrote:I’m 44 and would love another. I feel I’m too old. My eggs are too old. I’m afraid of genetic defects.
If I was childless, I would absolutely go for it but not if I had 2-3 kids already. Not sure how I would feel if I only had one kid.