Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has a guardian who supports the abortion. Why is the guardian’s permission not enough?

Read the article, stupid. It clearly says she wanted the baby at one point and is grieving the death of a friend. Judge wants her to pause to make sure of decision before moving forward.
God, you’re dumb.

Actually, if you read, it does NOT say she wanted the baby, but that she was open to it, which is not nearly as definitive.

You just proved my point.

Not in the slightest. Words have meaning, and yours were inaccurate.

Richt, words have meaning which is exactly how you proved my point.

DP. The PP who said she “wanted” the baby is wrong. At most, she was “open” which is not the same thing at all.

“ the minor, at least at one point, says she was open to having a child, but later changed her view after considering her inability to care for a child in her current station in life.””

She’s more mature than many adults. The judge is a POS.

+1. The lower court basically acknowledged she was mature enough to make the decision and had reasonable grounds for doing so, but then used the death of the friend as a hook to block her from getting the abortion anyway.

Anonymous wrote:Women and girls should not have to ask for permission to control whether or not they have a child. Period.

Exactly.

This shouldn’t even be up for discussion.