Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:David Thorstad, a prominent atheist, founded the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) to advocate for pedophilia and pererasty.
Yeah we hate that guy too. Howzabout you disown your monsters and conspirators? We’re waiting…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?
Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.
How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?
No. Most words have about 10 different legitimate interpretations. Something like the way people interpret the constitution
Can you post what your version is and what it says in the place of those verses please? That certainly would be evidence against the OPS point
op’s linked website states God is a fictional character and the Bible is man-made, and non/believers should avoid taking any moral lessons from the Bible.
Why should anyone try to “prove” anything? Nobody cares! op and company already have their minds made up…and that’s fine. Anyone debating them is wasting time and mental space.
You’ve worked very hard to avoid answering the question. The reason is because your bible says exactly what this web site illustrates, and you are trying to distract from that fact.
That’s pretty obvious.
DP. See the post right above yours, which isn’t mine btw.
Anonymous wrote:David Thorstad, a prominent atheist, founded the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) to advocate for pedophilia and pererasty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?
Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.
How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?
No. Most words have about 10 different legitimate interpretations. Something like the way people interpret the constitution
Can you post what your version is and what it says in the place of those verses please? That certainly would be evidence against the OPS point
op’s linked website states God is a fictional character and the Bible is man-made, and non/believers should avoid taking any moral lessons from the Bible.
Why should anyone try to “prove” anything? Nobody cares! op and company already have their minds made up…and that’s fine. Anyone debating them is wasting time and mental space.
You’ve worked very hard to avoid answering the question. The reason is because your bible says exactly what this web site illustrates, and you are trying to distract from that fact.
That’s pretty obvious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?
Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.
How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?
No. Most words have about 10 different legitimate interpretations. Something like the way people interpret the constitution
Can you post what your version is and what it says in the place of those verses please? That certainly would be evidence against the OPS point
op’s linked website states God is a fictional character and the Bible is man-made, and non/believers should avoid taking any moral lessons from the Bible.
Why should anyone try to “prove” anything? Nobody cares! op and company already have their minds made up…and that’s fine. Anyone debating them is wasting time and mental space.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:God was loving to Adam and Eve. They disobeyed Him. He didn’t kill them.
But he petulantly turned away from them and cast humans from the "garden of eden" to suffer and die without experiencing his presence. Some might say it was an overreaction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?
Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.
How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?
No. Most words have about 10 different legitimate interpretations. Something like the way people interpret the constitution
Can you post what your version is and what it says in the place of those verses please? That certainly would be evidence against the OPS point
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?
Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.
How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?
No. Most words have about 10 different legitimate interpretations. Something like the way people interpret the constitution
Can you post what your version is and what it says in the place of those verses please? That certainly would be evidence against the OPS point
pp here. what verses?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?
Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.
How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?
No. Most words have about 10 different legitimate interpretations. Something like the way people interpret the constitution
Can you post what your version is and what it says in the place of those verses please? That certainly would be evidence against the OPS point
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?
Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.
How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?
No. Most words have about 10 different legitimate interpretations. Something like the way people interpret the constitution
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?
Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.
How about the version you follow? Does it say those things?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?
Depends how it's been translated. If you can't read it in the original, that means that you are reading at translation of a translation of a translation.
Anonymous wrote:Does the Bible say the things that are linked or not?