Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here. Honestly if they want to change it then it needs to be birth year like soccer. That way there isn’t any switching of age groups in the middle of a 5 week season. As another poster said that messes up practice times too.
soccer is only like this for travel- if you play rec soccer you play with your grade level.
In terms of practice times- that is up to your team- the team can choose to have kids practice whenever they want and with whatever age group they want.
I swam for the NVSL when you aged up mid season. My kids swim now with the June 1st rule. We don't benefit from it (winter birthdays) but it is what it is. I see both sides, and basically think they just need a clear rule. The June 1st rule works. They could age mid season. They could set the age as of Aug 1st. (e.g. USA triathalon goes by birth year, so if you have a December birthday and will turn 11, but run a triathalon in the summer when you are 10, you will run as an '11 year old.') No matter when the cutoff is some kids will be advantaged and some kids will be disadvantaged.
I think the 19 year olds swimming is a red herring- very very few kids come back to swim for the NVSL after their freshman year of college.
It makes more of a difference for 8 and under's, less every year after that.
My kids are in rec soccer, and it’s by year, not grade.
Anonymous wrote:You swim mommies are annoying AF. Such whiners. It is a sport where they swim the length of a pool and back. Who gives a crap about the birthdays. Can you not make anything fun? Is everything a competition in your poor kids life? Swim team is supposed to be enjoyable. Parents ruin everything
Anonymous wrote:Thanks for the interesting age cutoff history. I enjoy parent rep drama as a parent rep myself!
Our club has a lot of really successful summer birthday swimmers. It definitely helps to turning 9 and competing against a group with a lot of 6-7 year olds, or turning 13 and competing against just-turned 11 year olds. Those are some big jumps physically and developmentally. I have a spring birthday kid so she is young for most activities that she does and the youngest in her grade because of pandemic redshirting. It is what it is so all you can do is observe it and shrug it off. When it gets my kid down, I gently remind her that she is being compared to kids who were in preschool when she was born. That helps give her some perspective.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP here. Honestly if they want to change it then it needs to be birth year like soccer. That way there isn’t any switching of age groups in the middle of a 5 week season. As another poster said that messes up practice times too.
soccer is only like this for travel- if you play rec soccer you play with your grade level.
In terms of practice times- that is up to your team- the team can choose to have kids practice whenever they want and with whatever age group they want.
I swam for the NVSL when you aged up mid season. My kids swim now with the June 1st rule. We don't benefit from it (winter birthdays) but it is what it is. I see both sides, and basically think they just need a clear rule. The June 1st rule works. They could age mid season. They could set the age as of Aug 1st. (e.g. USA triathalon goes by birth year, so if you have a December birthday and will turn 11, but run a triathalon in the summer when you are 10, you will run as an '11 year old.') No matter when the cutoff is some kids will be advantaged and some kids will be disadvantaged.
I think the 19 year olds swimming is a red herring- very very few kids come back to swim for the NVSL after their freshman year of college.
It makes more of a difference for 8 and under's, less every year after that.
Anonymous wrote:You swim mommies are annoying AF. Such whiners. It is a sport where they swim the length of a pool and back. Who gives a crap about the birthdays. Can you not make anything fun? Is everything a competition in your poor kids life? Swim team is supposed to be enjoyable. Parents ruin everything
Anonymous wrote:You swim mommies are annoying AF. Such whiners. It is a sport where they swim the length of a pool and back. Who gives a crap about the birthdays. Can you not make anything fun? Is everything a competition in your poor kids life? Swim team is supposed to be enjoyable. Parents ruin everything
Anonymous wrote:And yet it happens all the time in winter swim. Ask those of us with kids with March birthdays and how difficult it is to make JOs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NVSL voted this rule after major lobbying fromTeam Reps who had children w/ summer birthdays. That is the truth of it. There was some discussion of at least choosing a summer swim meet date (usually 3rd Sat in June) but two parent reps w/ kids’ birthdays on or about June 1 and June 15 claimed it would be administratively easier to just arbitrarily (and conveniently) choose June 1 as the date. Coincidentally team rep’s child broke the pool record by lowering the 11-12 year old record as a biologically aged 13 year old. Over the years, most of our pool records have been broken by the age advantage. 9 year olds beat the records of 8 and understand… 19 year old division 1 swimmers who turn 19 at the begin I g of June can now compete as 18 year olds. I was resentful but accept it is what it is. They just need to change the record titles for accuracy or add an asterisk to the records.
I agree the biggest disadvantage to regular swimmers are kids that turn 9 in June that compete as 8 & under and kids that turn 19 and are division 1 college swimmers. It is an advantage in other cases, but most obvious in those two.
Anonymous wrote:I get the frustration. I have a swimmer whose ability to make A meets is definitely impacted by the two kids in the AG who are 18mos older, and it's hard. But that's life in almost everything. As pointed out there are cutoffs for school and other sports, so no matter what date you choose you're going to have kids potentially 2 or more years apart.
I'll also say now that we have middle schoolers it's hard emotionally on those summer birthday kids too as their friends move up an age group and they are stuck with the younger group. My child has a friend who was a rising 8th grader this summer and was clearly unhappy to be in the age group with rising 6th graders while classmates moved into the teen ranks. It didn't matter as much to them when they were all elementary schoolers but socially it was an impact. No, it shouldn't be, but middle schoolers are irrational.
TLDL, changing the process might benefit my child so selfishly yes I'd say change it. Reality is the cut-off is somewhere so I don't really stress about it. It isn't worth a floating date for a 6wk season.
Anonymous wrote:It's not the "wrong" age group. Put away the sour grapes.