Anonymous wrote:I am curious about the part where you are a millennial and know that you are in your "forever" home. I am nearly 50 (not that much older) and the house I owned at 32 (not sure how old you are as millennial seems to be a huge span) was much smaller than where we live now. Maybe it is a frame of mind. Who knows what house you will be in forever and you build a lot of equity fast in DC. Just take it one year at a time and if you want more space or something nicer you can always move.
Anonymous wrote:How do they compare? I am struggling coming to terms with the fact that our likely forever home is older, smaller by 1k sq ft (more for DH), and in a less desirable neighborhood than the home I grew up in. We make way more than either set of parents ever did and they were in this area as well, but of course housing prices have rapidly outpaced income so comparable homes to those we grew up in are hundreds of thousands out of reach for us. What about you?
Anonymous wrote:My house is probably the same square footage but it’s a tall skinny townhouse with no yard versus a single story house on a quarter acre. It’s impossible to compare but I think we did ok. Eventually I would love a yard but I'm happy with this is my 30s.
Anonymous wrote:I think some of the Millennial posters here are confused. Especially since so many of you didn't grow up in the DMV. It makes a lot of sense that the homes you lived in from other locales would be more spacious than the homes you're living in here in the DMV.
The close-in housing in Arlington, Alexandria, Bethesda and Chevy Chase that is so highly valued now was actually looked down on in the 70s and 80s. If you want to know why, look at it. The homes that are left from that time period were clearly very small tract houses built in the 20s, 30s and 40s to house war time workers. The rich people lived further out, in much nicer houses and they certainly didn't muck about in yucky Lyons Village or Old Town or places like that. People who lived there were the worker bees, the poor people, not anyone who had any money.
The close-in homes only began to appreciate as a result of the gas and energy crisis. People working in government jobs began to want to live closer to the city to cut their costs. And as women began to enter the workplace as part of dual-income families, it made sense to live closer to their jobs so that their latch-key children weren't alone so long after school.
Which leads us to what we have now. A bunch of Millennials living in the small houses, or buying new properties built in the stead of teardowns. And you're all surprised that the little house isn't as spacious as the home you grew up in at some other city with a completely different real estate market.
Anyway, if you're going to make compare, then at least ensure that you're comparing apples to apples, and not apples to Zebras.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Millennials have never grown up.
Yeah, it is becoming more and more apparent. Unfortunately now they're raising kids. Yikes. This is an accident that's happening before our very eyes.
They have kids, daycare workers, teachers and grandparents are raising them
Ah, yes, because Boomers and Gen X never had teachers or grandparents help them raise their kids... (please note the dripping sarcasm).
Anonymous wrote:I am curious about the part where you are a millennial and know that you are in your "forever" home. I am nearly 50 (not that much older) and the house I owned at 32 (not sure how old you are as millennial seems to be a huge span) was much smaller than where we live now. Maybe it is a frame of mind. Who knows what house you will be in forever and you build a lot of equity fast in DC. Just take it one year at a time and if you want more space or something nicer you can always move.