Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It can't be done. Proven time and time again. We should just give up on this idea and go to another plan.
When have we offered universal pre- k to all? Class sizes in public school as small as private school ( max 15). Universal Year round schooling and late opening hours to mitigate extra tutoring and enrichment by the middle class/rich?
The answer is never so we have never done what would work to actually level the playing field. What happens outside the classroom is at least equally if not more important. Kids need supervision to get homework done, intervention if behind, the ability to move at their own pace.
Universal pre-K does help poor so you could try it more. Year round schools and late opening seems to me to be smart for some percentage of the population.
Anonymous wrote:How about we start the school day for most kids at 9. Have the sports teams practice period be a flexi one and those kids can come in 7/8 to cover that class that the rest do 3/4.
If kids don’t have to wake up at the crack of dawn they won’t be tired.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It can't be done. Proven time and time again. We should just give up on this idea and go to another plan.
When have we offered universal pre- k to all? Class sizes in public school as small as private school ( max 15). Universal Year round schooling and late opening hours to mitigate extra tutoring and enrichment by the middle class/rich?
The answer is never so we have never done what would work to actually level the playing field. What happens outside the classroom is at least equally if not more important. Kids need supervision to get homework done, intervention if behind, the ability to move at their own pace.
This. And also outlaw private schools except ones that only do religious education.
What schools only do religious education?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It can't be done. Proven time and time again. We should just give up on this idea and go to another plan.
When have we offered universal pre- k to all? Class sizes in public school as small as private school ( max 15). Universal Year round schooling and late opening hours to mitigate extra tutoring and enrichment by the middle class/rich?
The answer is never so we have never done what would work to actually level the playing field. What happens outside the classroom is at least equally if not more important. Kids need supervision to get homework done, intervention if behind, the ability to move at their own pace.
This. And also outlaw private schools except ones that only do religious education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It can't be done. Proven time and time again. We should just give up on this idea and go to another plan.
When have we offered universal pre- k to all? Class sizes in public school as small as private school ( max 15). Universal Year round schooling and late opening hours to mitigate extra tutoring and enrichment by the middle class/rich?
The answer is never so we have never done what would work to actually level the playing field. What happens outside the classroom is at least equally if not more important. Kids need supervision to get homework done, intervention if behind, the ability to move at their own pace.
This. And also outlaw private schools except ones that only do religious education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It can't be done. Proven time and time again. We should just give up on this idea and go to another plan.
Honestly, this. Set a reasonably high floor for public education and make sure that the education offered at every school is sufficient for a student to become literate, numerate, and employable. Offer a track at every school that can lead to college and robust vocational training opportunities for kids not interested in college.
Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t see what’s really wrong with closing the achievement gap from the top down.
Virtually all the people at the top benefited from unearned privilege.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It can't be done. Proven time and time again. We should just give up on this idea and go to another plan.
When have we offered universal pre- k to all? Class sizes in public school as small as private school ( max 15). Universal Year round schooling and late opening hours to mitigate extra tutoring and enrichment by the middle class/rich?
The answer is never so we have never done what would work to actually level the playing field. What happens outside the classroom is at least equally if not more important. Kids need supervision to get homework done, intervention if behind, the ability to move at their own pace.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Title 1 schools in FCPS offer free meals and they have smaller class sizes and there are more reading and math specialists on hand to help students and they send home free books. I am not sure what else these schools can do but there is still a gap and that gap is growing.
Smaller class sizes than where? Are you claiming that UMC white kids are in larger classes than poor brown ones if so then an Oprah special should be dedicated to that title 1 school and those schools with classes of 40 POC kids need to be told how to achieve that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It can't be done. Proven time and time again. We should just give up on this idea and go to another plan.
When have we offered universal pre- k to all? Class sizes in public school as small as private school ( max 15). Universal Year round schooling and late opening hours to mitigate extra tutoring and enrichment by the middle class/rich?
The answer is never so we have never done what would work to actually level the playing field. What happens outside the classroom is at least equally if not more important. Kids need supervision to get homework done, intervention if behind, the ability to move at their own pace.
Title 1 schools in FCPS have pre-K for the kids who are from impoverished families and small classroom sizes. The gap persists. Part of the problem is that ESOL are placed in a regular classroom in ES. In MS, the ESOL kids have their own classes and you start to see gains when that happens. I have no clue why the ESOL classes are not separated out in ES so that younger kids have a better chance of staying on grade level while learning English. It would decrease the need for ESOL class in MS because the kids were more likely to learn English in ES. The ESOL program would still be needed for kids who are arriving at later ages but hopefully the ES kids would be able to move out of it at an earlier age.
And nothing that is done in the schools will work if the kids do not make it to school. There is a higher level of absenteeism associated with lower incomes. If the kids are not at school, there is no chance to help them learn.
Title 1 schools offer summer school to FARMs families and parents choose not to participate.
There is a large societal issue at play here, we are not going to fix it by slowing down things for the MC and UMC kids.
I disagree about putting all ESOL students in ES in totally separate classes. First of all, it's not legal. Secondly, students learn a lot from their peers. If you separate all of the Spanish speaking students, they won't have any English speaking role models. I'm an ESOL teacher and my kindergarteners almost always make grade level benchmarks by the end of the year unless they have attendance issues or cognitive ones. It takes a lot of work but it can be done.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It can't be done. Proven time and time again. We should just give up on this idea and go to another plan.
When have we offered universal pre- k to all? Class sizes in public school as small as private school ( max 15). Universal Year round schooling and late opening hours to mitigate extra tutoring and enrichment by the middle class/rich?
The answer is never so we have never done what would work to actually level the playing field. What happens outside the classroom is at least equally if not more important. Kids need supervision to get homework done, intervention if behind, the ability to move at their own pace.
Title 1 schools in FCPS have pre-K for the kids who are from impoverished families and small classroom sizes. The gap persists. Part of the problem is that ESOL are placed in a regular classroom in ES. In MS, the ESOL kids have their own classes and you start to see gains when that happens. I have no clue why the ESOL classes are not separated out in ES so that younger kids have a better chance of staying on grade level while learning English. It would decrease the need for ESOL class in MS because the kids were more likely to learn English in ES. The ESOL program would still be needed for kids who are arriving at later ages but hopefully the ES kids would be able to move out of it at an earlier age.
And nothing that is done in the schools will work if the kids do not make it to school. There is a higher level of absenteeism associated with lower incomes. If the kids are not at school, there is no chance to help them learn.
Title 1 schools offer summer school to FARMs families and parents choose not to participate.
There is a large societal issue at play here, we are not going to fix it by slowing down things for the MC and UMC kids.
Anonymous wrote:
So what is the high achieving immigrants from poverty stricken countries who are staffing our hospitals and tech firms do right then to do as well as they did?. That future doctor in rural India had far fewer resources available to them than any American kid today.