Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Home many in DMV actually have a 30 year mortgage?!? DH and I have a 15 year at 2.25%. Of course, we could have gone with a 30 year and invested the savings in the stock market, but how many people actually do this? Most of my friends have homes worth twice ours, but they have an HHI that is maybe 1/2. Most of our neighbors with similar home values are sporting used Toyotas, unkempt yards, IKEA furniture, and vacations to Rehoboth. Meanwhile, we have BMWs, several millions in savings, well manicured gardens and maintained home, heirloom Stickley furniture, and multiple int'l vacations per year in first class. One of our neighbor's trees fell down 2 years ago near the edge of our property line and they still haven't removed it. They want to split the $800 cost for removal. For real?!? Are we way off base, here?
You sound like a complete and total jerk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is dumb to tie yourself to a 15-year mortgage. Get a 30-year mortgage and make double payments. This gives you flexibility if, for example, one or both of you lose your jobs and you have cash flow problems for a month or two. Apparently your idiotic plan worked out for you and your husband, OP, but it isn't the best choice.
OP, here. Why would either of us lose our jobs? We're both highly sought after and star workers? Besides, we have a 12-month+ safety net in liquid savings outside retirement. Just feels like people in DMV are way too invested in their homes, many house poor, and not diversified enough across a balance of assets, amenities, and experiences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is dumb to tie yourself to a 15-year mortgage. Get a 30-year mortgage and make double payments. This gives you flexibility if, for example, one or both of you lose your jobs and you have cash flow problems for a month or two. Apparently your idiotic plan worked out for you and your husband, OP, but it isn't the best choice.
OP, here. Why would either of us lose our jobs? We're both highly sought after and star workers? Besides, we have a 12-month+ safety net in liquid savings outside retirement. Just feels like people in DMV are way too invested in their homes, many house poor, and not diversified enough across a balance of assets, amenities, and experiences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is dumb to tie yourself to a 15-year mortgage. Get a 30-year mortgage and make double payments. This gives you flexibility if, for example, one or both of you lose your jobs and you have cash flow problems for a month or two. Apparently your idiotic plan worked out for you and your husband, OP, but it isn't the best choice.
OP, here. Why would either of us lose our jobs? We're both highly sought after and star workers? Besides, we have a 12-month+ safety net in liquid savings outside retirement. Just feels like people in DMV are way too invested in their homes, many house poor, and not diversified enough across a balance of assets, amenities, and experiences.
Anonymous wrote:So, yeah, in this example a 30 year monthly payment is $1,975 while a 15 year monthly payment is $3,333. The owner with the 15 year is piling the extra $1,358 (and then some, since % of P+I on I is lower) into building greater home equity via illiquid savings. The owner with the 30 year? Hats off if their $1,358 per month is being invested another way with a greater return. In the majority of cases, it’s actually used to cover things like taxes, insurance, car payments, and groceries. We at least know for a fact that any owner with a 15 year mortgage is committed to savings.
Anonymous wrote:
You are not a mechanical engineer, and have no such specialization. Your terminology is glaringly lacking from an engineering perspective. The Germans lost engineering preeminence after WW2. As it relates to BMW, case in point: VANOS. Where the conceptual could never square with the real world.
-a German engineer
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m laughing about the BMW. Do you think that’s a quality car?
NP. I think BMWs are very high quality cars. I am a mechanical engineer with a specialization in automotive engineering and am amazed at the attention to detail that is placed into most of their models. Any car brand can cherry pick one or two features upon which to optimize (e.g., quietness, acceleration, state-of-the-art tech, cost, etc…), but building a vehicle that has been optimized and harmoniously balanced across a multitude of characteristics is impressive. This is why a BMW is the Ultimate Driving Machine.
Anonymous wrote:
People are smarter than you. They spend beyond their means on housing. That’s very smart. Homes are assets that appreciate in value. They spend the minimum on goods and services because they are depreciating assets.
You do the opposite. You spend little on your house and overspend on depreciating cars, furniture and dinner plates. Not smart.
Anonymous wrote:A $500K 30 year mortgage at 2.5% generates $213,323 in interest payments over 30 years. A $500K 15 year mortgage at the same rate generates $100,146 in interest. This is a $111,177 savings over 30 years. Furthermore, most 30 year mortgages carry higher APRs, thereby increasing the value of a 15 year even more.
If the plan is to just pay extra principal...why not get the 15 year to begin with?!? Answer: the obsession with living beyond ones means. Proof: the fact that so many other expenses incurred are for substantially lower quality goods and services. Look at me ma! I live in a 5000 sqft plastic palace. Oh, BTW, we're eating Kraft mac and cheese for dinner on cheap plates from walmart. And don't mind the air matress on the floor in the guest bedroom....
Anonymous wrote:Let’s make this nice and simple. Assume we buy a new home that costs $Y with a down payment of 20%. At the 2.5% APR that everyone on DCUM seems to have, this means a mortgage of $0.8*Y over either 15 or 30 years. At 30 years, the fixed monthly principal + interest payment is $0.003160*Y. At 15 years, the fixed monthly principal + interest payment is $0.005334*Y. Monthly property taxes might be around $0.0009*Y. Monthly homeowners insurance might be around $0.0001*Y.
PITI for a 30 year mortgage ends up at $(0.003160 + 0.0009 + 0.0001)*Y = $0.004160*Y
PITI for a 15 year mortgage ends up at $(0.005334 + 0.0009 + 0.0001)*Y = $0.006334*Y
The rule of 28% tells us that PITI should be no more than 28% of gross monthly HHI (MHHI).
Now, let’s solve for Y as a function of monthly gross HHI (MHHI) and annual HHI (12*MHHI):
30 year mortgage: $0.004160*Y < 0.28*HHI: Y < 67.31*MHHI: Y < 5.61*HHI
15 year mortgage: $0.006334*Y < 0.28*HHI: Y < 44.21*MHHI: Y < 3.69*HHI
Multiple your HHI by 3.69. If your house cost more than this when you bought it, and you’re dependent on a mortgage for financing, you’re living beyond your means. These people can’t get approved for 15 year mortgages, so they regress to buying a home with a 30 year one. Now, according to the bank, you can afford a home that is 5.61X your HHI. Buy, of course! Awesome way to impress your friends and family until you realize you didn’t budget for a 1.5X increase in maintenance costs and now can’t afford to spend a few hundred dollars to even remove a fallen tree.
Anonymous wrote:Home many in DMV actually have a 30 year mortgage?!? DH and I have a 15 year at 2.25%. Of course, we could have gone with a 30 year and invested the savings in the stock market, but how many people actually do this? Most of my friends have homes worth twice ours, but they have an HHI that is maybe 1/2. Most of our neighbors with similar home values are sporting used Toyotas, unkempt yards, IKEA furniture, and vacations to Rehoboth. Meanwhile, we have BMWs, several millions in savings, well manicured gardens and maintained home, heirloom Stickley furniture, and multiple int'l vacations per year in first class. One of our neighbor's trees fell down 2 years ago near the edge of our property line and they still haven't removed it. They want to split the $800 cost for removal. For real?!? Are we way off base, here?