Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is about free speech and free exercise of religion.
No student is forced to participate in a post game prayer. This decision affirms the right for a coach to pray publicly following a game (or before a game).
This does not violate the separation of church and state.
Did you ever play HS sports? When the coach asks the team to participate in a public team prayer, there is a lot of pressure for everyone to participate. The ones who don’t want to do it bow their heads and are silent or mumble. If you are going to object to the prayer you may as well quit the team because you will be treated as a problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes it is. Read the case.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MMoH started us on this path towards intolerance towards religious expression in the 60’s. I am thankful God is taking back the places people were restricted from their free exercise of religion. In the oral argument, the lawyer for the district said coercion of students had nothing to do with this case. Many chose to join his sessions.
It speaks wonders to know so many from the stands rushed the field to join the coach in prayer.
This was such the right decision.
Many felt like they had to join his sessions because then they wouldn’t get playing time over those who did if they didn’t.
That is just not true at all.
Read the case and the oral arguments and statements from the school and the parents. There was zero coercion.
If you think that persons in positions of authority over children - like coaches and teachers - can ask children to join in prayer to Jesus Christ without having Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, atheist, or agnostic children feeling coerced then you clearly have no understanding of children and the power of teachers and coaches over them. Would you ever say that a student could avoid sexual advances by a coach because there was no "coercion"? Simply being in a position of authority over children implies a level of coercive power.
You didn’t read the case or the news. When he started doi the prayers privately, SOME students ASKED to join him. There was zero coercion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Am I reading this wrong that the guy prayed on his own time and didn't lead anything?
I am a committed atheist but I don't see anything wrong with a private prayer.
He violated the rights of others by praying in the public sphere. Do whatever you want in your own home or in a building specifically designated for religion but do not bring religion into the public sphere.
So I am not allowed to pray anywhere in the "public sphere"??? Not allowed to thank God for the food in front of me at a restaurant? Not allowed to stand in the middle of Yosemite and thank God for its beauty? Not allowed to pray for someone's recovery if I am walking down the street and see a car accident?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Am I reading this wrong that the guy prayed on his own time and didn't lead anything?
I am a committed atheist but I don't see anything wrong with a private prayer.
He violated the rights of others by praying in the public sphere. Do whatever you want in your own home or in a building specifically designated for religion but do not bring religion into the public sphere.
So I am not allowed to pray anywhere in the "public sphere"??? Not allowed to thank God for the food in front of me at a restaurant? Not allowed to stand in the middle of Yosemite and thank God for its beauty? Not allowed to pray for someone's recovery if I am walking down the street and see a car accident?
Anonymous wrote:How many Muslim clerics are football coaches? My gosh you people always go to the extreme!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perfect. Lets start leading some Muslim prayers in school.
This. We have some extended family in the Midwest that see nothing wrong with this because they are very religious (Christians obviously) and are surrounded by similar people so for them this so normal, having prayer at board school meetings, political meetings, school, sports events and so on. Because they think the US is a Christian country where other faiths exist and are tolerated as long as they do their things in their homes/place of faith. They don’t conceive that if taxpayer money goes to Christian schools then their packager money can support a Muslim school or a Indù school. Let’s have a Muslim cleric pray on the 50 line at their HS Friday night game and you will see WW3
Anonymous wrote:This is about free speech and free exercise of religion.
No student is forced to participate in a post game prayer. This decision affirms the right for a coach to pray publicly following a game (or before a game).
This does not violate the separation of church and state.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Am I reading this wrong that the guy prayed on his own time and didn't lead anything?
I am a committed atheist but I don't see anything wrong with a private prayer.
He violated the rights of others by praying in the public sphere. Do whatever you want in your own home or in a building specifically designated for religion but do not bring religion into the public sphere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes it is. Read the case.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MMoH started us on this path towards intolerance towards religious expression in the 60’s. I am thankful God is taking back the places people were restricted from their free exercise of religion. In the oral argument, the lawyer for the district said coercion of students had nothing to do with this case. Many chose to join his sessions.
It speaks wonders to know so many from the stands rushed the field to join the coach in prayer.
This was such the right decision.
Many felt like they had to join his sessions because then they wouldn’t get playing time over those who did if they didn’t.
That is just not true at all.
Read the case and the oral arguments and statements from the school and the parents. There was zero coercion.
If you think that persons in positions of authority over children - like coaches and teachers - can ask children to join in prayer to Jesus Christ without having Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu, atheist, or agnostic children feeling coerced then you clearly have no understanding of children and the power of teachers and coaches over them. Would you ever say that a student could avoid sexual advances by a coach because there was no "coercion"? Simply being in a position of authority over children implies a level of coercive power.
Anonymous wrote:Perfect. Lets start leading some Muslim prayers in school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MMoH started us on this path towards intolerance towards religious expression in the 60’s. I am thankful God is taking back the places people were restricted from their free exercise of religion. In the oral argument, the lawyer for the district said coercion of students had nothing to do with this case. Many chose to join his sessions.
It speaks wonders to know so many from the stands rushed the field to join the coach in prayer.
This was such the right decision.
I do not believe in God, I do not want my children being led in prayer in their public school and I consider this ruling a violation of my and my children's religious freedom. I might be more appalled by this than the abortion ruling for which I disagreed, but could follow the constitutional logic. This literally is pushing me to vote democratic when I've been frustrated with Biden and the far left.
No child was forced to join in prayer. The coach had the right to exercise his religion freely.
Do you truly not understand human social power dynamics or are you just arguing? Being a leader comes with responsibility. Using your power to manipulate minors or subordinates is not moral.
And just what do parents do every day? Thank you for making your ridiculous point for everyone to see!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For Catholics, they have short historical memories. This is part of the problem with having little geographical diversity on the Court (heavy on mid-Atlantic Catholics). I grew up in the South and West, where there are a lot of Christians (including Evangelicals and Mormons) who think that Catholics are Papist idolators going straight to hell, and they were praying for our conversion. Catholics were some of the early proponents of separation of church and state in the U.S., because they were a minority and disfavored religion for so long.
Justice Brennan, a devout Catholic, realized that separate of church and state is necessary for people to be able to practice freely. Combining church and state is good for neither the church nor the state. (As the Inquisition and the Renaissance teach us - again, short historical memories.)
I feel bad for the Jewish and Muslim kids in place like the South and Midwest, who are going to have to hold hands and mouth the Our Father if they want any playing time.
Also, funny how when it comes to my womb, it's all about local governmental control, but when it comes to asking a football coach not to organize a prayer circle with his teenage players, suddenly the local authorities don't know what they are doing.
And Hindu kids, and Sikh kids, and Jain kids, and aethist kids...