Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think climate change will most definitely come into play. I can see northern schools away from the coasts (UChicago, Northwestern, Cornell, Dartmouth) being particularly resilient.

Climate Change will take decades of not more. What's more impactful is competition for resources and jobs are what people focus on the most.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bullish on Cornell (I know, get your jokes in)

Bearish on vandy, rice, Emory
Duke will fall but stay in t20

Cornell, jhu will rise

Bullish on Cornell

Cornell's ranking has been falling for years.

Cornell will be desired more as climate change keeps happening and fake t20 schools outside the northeast lose competitiveness

Cornell's barely an ivy. I was reading an abc news article about ivy endowments and they left Cornell completely out. The article said that there was only 7 ivys... How embarrassing. The fact that the southern elite and WashU can match the so called Ivy says all that needs to be said.

Lmao. WashU boosters and being desperate. Name a more iconic duo.

Not a WashU booster, I named it because it's not in the south. But WashU, Emory, Rice, Vandy will all pass Cornell eventually. They have so much more going for them. Vandy already passed them tbh.

Anonymous wrote:I think climate change will most definitely come into play. I can see northern schools away from the coasts (UChicago, Northwestern, Cornell, Dartmouth) being particularly resilient.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bullish on Cornell (I know, get your jokes in)

Bearish on vandy, rice, Emory
Duke will fall but stay in t20

Cornell, jhu will rise

Bullish on Cornell

Cornell's ranking has been falling for years.

Cornell will be desired more as climate change keeps happening and fake t20 schools outside the northeast lose competitiveness

Cornell's barely an ivy. I was reading an abc news article about ivy endowments and they left Cornell completely out. The article said that there was only 7 ivys... How embarrassing. The fact that the southern elite and WashU can match the so called Ivy says all that needs to be said.

Lmao. WashU boosters and being desperate. Name a more iconic duo.

Anonymous wrote:I don't give a hoot about any of the rankings, but it will be interesting to see how the reversal of Roe v. Wade affects the ability of colleges in red states to attract strong students, especially women. Rice, Wash U, Tulane and Vanderbilt could be in trouble.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bullish on Cornell (I know, get your jokes in)

Bearish on vandy, rice, Emory
Duke will fall but stay in t20

Cornell, jhu will rise

Bullish on Cornell

Cornell's ranking has been falling for years.

Cornell will be desired more as climate change keeps happening and fake t20 schools outside the northeast lose competitiveness

Cornell's barely an ivy. I was reading an abc news article about ivy endowments and they left Cornell completely out. The article said that there was only 7 ivys... How embarrassing. The fact that the southern elite and WashU can match the so called Ivy says all that needs to be said.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bullish on Cornell (I know, get your jokes in)

Bearish on vandy, rice, Emory
Duke will fall but stay in t20

Cornell, jhu will rise

Bullish on Cornell

Cornell's ranking has been falling for years.

Cornell will be desired more as climate change keeps happening and fake t20 schools outside the northeast lose competitiveness

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Based on earlier comments, it sounds like people want to base academic rankings on job placement and salary statistics. Those two don’t necessarily correlate. If you’re comparing an Ivy classics major to a State U CS major, the comparison makes no sense from an academic perspective, but the CS major will have a higher salary. What’s the point of the ROI focus? To make the arts look bad? Don’t people already know which majors pay? ROI is a dumb way to rate academic excellence.

College degree is useless waste of money if you serve at a restaurant or make coffee at Starbucks afterwards.
It's not everything but most important factor

It works the other way too. Anyone who pays too dollar for a degree in a field which pays high salaries regardless of where your degree is from is throwing away their money. When you can do just as well in engineering or CS with a degree from Stat U, why pay 2-3 times as much as much?

That is like saying why go to a Michelin star restaurant when you can go to McDonald's and get a meal at lower price.

Getting a CS degree from GMU is not same as a CS degree from CMU.

True. But getting a CS degree from Georgia Tech ($50K OOS) is comparable to a CS degree from CMU ($80K OOS).

If you need aid, CMU will award it. Not going to get anything from a highly-ranked public as an OOS.

What is considered highly ranked is Georgia Tech highly ranked?

Georgia Tech is ranked #5 in Computer Science. Is being #5 highly ranked in your dictionary?

Yes, but that’s one program. How is it’s classics program? That’s why it’s not a highly ranked overall.

Anonymous wrote:Rice or Vanderbilt will probably drop out of the top 20

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Based on earlier comments, it sounds like people want to base academic rankings on job placement and salary statistics. Those two don’t necessarily correlate. If you’re comparing an Ivy classics major to a State U CS major, the comparison makes no sense from an academic perspective, but the CS major will have a higher salary. What’s the point of the ROI focus? To make the arts look bad? Don’t people already know which majors pay? ROI is a dumb way to rate academic excellence.

College degree is useless waste of money if you serve at a restaurant or make coffee at Starbucks afterwards.
It's not everything but most important factor

It works the other way too. Anyone who pays too dollar for a degree in a field which pays high salaries regardless of where your degree is from is throwing away their money. When you can do just as well in engineering or CS with a degree from Stat U, why pay 2-3 times as much as much?

That is like saying why go to a Michelin star restaurant when you can go to McDonald's and get a meal at lower price.

Getting a CS degree from GMU is not same as a CS degree from CMU.

True. But getting a CS degree from Georgia Tech ($50K OOS) is comparable to a CS degree from CMU ($80K OOS).

If you need aid, CMU will award it. Not going to get anything from a highly-ranked public as an OOS.

What is considered highly ranked is Georgia Tech highly ranked?

Georgia Tech is ranked #5 in Computer Science. Is being #5 highly ranked in your dictionary?

Yes, but that’s one program. How is it’s classics program? That’s why it’s not a highly ranked overall.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Bullish on Cornell (I know, get your jokes in)

Bearish on vandy, rice, Emory
Duke will fall but stay in t20

Cornell, jhu will rise

Bullish on Cornell

Cornell's ranking has been falling for years.